Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Pennsylvania opinions name it 1 courts 2010–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Lordred2 sentences2023See Commonwealth v. Lord, 553 Pa. 415 , 719 A.2d 306 (Pa. 1998); Castillo, supra. This waiver rule applies to family law cases. 2016See Frazier v. City of Philadelphia, 735 A.2d 113, 115 (Pa.1999) (holding that “an order is not appealable until it is entered on the docket with the required notation that appropriate notice has been given”). -3- J-S66035-16 court order to file Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) statement of matters complained of on appeal); see also J.P. v. S.P., 991 A.2d 904, 908 (Pa.Super.2010) (citing Commonwealth v. Lord, 719 A.2d 306 (Pa.1998)) (“an appellant’s failure to comply with an order to file a Rule 1925(b) statement in a timely manner constitutes waiver of all objections to the order, ruling, or other matter co | 6 | 6 |
Jp v. Spgreen2 sentences2017See J.P. v. S.P., 991 A.2d 904, 908 (Pa. Super. 2010) (noting that “an appellant’s failure to comply with an order to file a Rule 1925(b) statement in a timely manner constitutes waiver of all objections to the order, ruling, or other matter complained of on appeal.”). 2016Ordinarily, “an appellant’s failure to comply with an order to file a Rule 1925(b) statement in a timely manner constitutes waiver of all objections to the order, ruling, or other matter complained of on appeal.” J.P. v. S.P., 991 A.2d 904, 908 (Pa.Super.2010). | 3 | 3 |
Frazier v. City of Philadelphiagreen1 sentence2016See Frazier v. City of Philadelphia, 735 A.2d 113, 115 (Pa.1999) (holding that “an order is not appealable until it is entered on the docket with the required notation that appropriate notice has been given”). -3- J-S66035-16 court order to file Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) statement of matters complained of on appeal); see also J.P. v. S.P., 991 A.2d 904, 908 (Pa.Super.2010) (citing Commonwealth v. Lord, 719 A.2d 306 (Pa.1998)) (“an appellant’s failure to comply with an order to file a Rule 1925(b) statement in a timely manner constitutes waiver of all objections to the order, ruling, or other matter co | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Castillo
green
1 sentence2015See Commonwealth v. Lord, 553 Pa. 415 , 719 A.2d 306 (1998); [Commonwealth v. Castillo, 888 A.2d 775 (Pa. 2005)]. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.