Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rodriguez v. Stategreen2 sentences2011See id. at 63–64. 2011See id. at 63-64 . | 3 | 3 |
Pettus v. Pettusgreen2 sentences2010See Pettus v. Pettus , 237 S.W.3d 405 , 417 n.8 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007, pet. denied) (noting that a divorce decree stating that the division of property was effective on an earlier date than decree was signed was not the effective date absent evidence that parties would have been aware of the court’s intention to make the date retroactive). 2010See Pettus v. Pettus, 237 S.W.3d 405 , 417 n.8 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007, pet. denied) (noting that a divorce decree stating that the division of property was effective on an earlier date than decree was signed was not the effective date absent evidence that parties would have been (3) ―Mr. Conner accepted the appointment effective approximately one month earlier than the order was signed, so his responsibilities began on that effective date of August 23, 2006.‖ 14 aware of the court’s intention to make the date retroactive). | 2 | 2 |
Barton v. Stategreen2 sentences2004However, credibility of the affiant is not a requirement of a probable cause search warrant affidavit when no confidential informants are used to establish probable cause. 3 Barton v. State, 962 S.W.2d 132, 138 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 1997, pet. ref d). 2004Barton v. State, 962 S.W.2d 132, 138 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 1997, pet. ref’d). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Ventresca
green
2 sentences2007While it’s true that affidavits for search warrants are “drafted by nonlaw-yers in the midst and haste of a criminal investigation,” as the majority quotes from United States v. Ventresca, 380 U.S. 102, 108 , 85 S.Ct. 741 , 13 L.Ed.2d 684 (1965), this does not excuse the affiant from the requirement that the facts must show that there is probable cause to search. 2007While it’s true that affidavits for search warrants are “drafted by nonlaw-yers in the midst and haste of a criminal investigation,” as the majority quotes from United States v. Ventresca, 380 U.S. 102, 108 , 85 S.Ct. 741 , 13 L.Ed.2d 684 (1965), this does not excuse the affiant from the requirement that the facts must show that there is probable cause to search. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Estate of Pollack v. McMurrey
green
1 sentence2002Id. at 391-92 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.