Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ladd v. Stategreen1 sentence2001Id. (citing Ladd v. State, 3 S.W.3d 547, 562 (Tex.Crim.App.1999), cert, denied, 529 U.S. 1070 , 120 S.Ct. 1680 , 146 L.Ed.2d 487 (2000)). | 1 | 1 |
Kucha v. Stategreen2 sentences1999The court analyzed the error under Almanza and held it was not egregiously harmful because the evidence proving the enhancement was “undisputed, uncontradicted, and seemed to have been taken almost as a ‘given’ by the parties.” Id. at 156. 1999“The fact of the prior convictions was not a contested issue at all.” Id. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Berkemer v. McCarty
green
2 sentences2002Id. 2002Id. | 3 | 2002–2002 |
Merit Management Partners I, L.P. v. Noelke
green
1 sentence2026Id. at 643 . | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Roderick Morrison v. State
green
1 sentence2018In Morrison v. State , 480 S.W.3d 647 (Tex.App.-El Paso 2015, no pet.), this Court analyzed a violation of the right to be present under the harmless beyond a reasonable doubt standard. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Stephney v. United States
green
1 sentence2001Id. (citing Ladd v. State, 3 S.W.3d 547, 562 (Tex.Crim.App.1999), cert, denied, 529 U.S. 1070 , 120 S.Ct. 1680 , 146 L.Ed.2d 487 (2000)). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Gardner v. United States
green
1 sentence2001Id. (citing Ladd v. State, 3 S.W.3d 547, 562 (Tex.Crim.App.1999), cert, denied, 529 U.S. 1070 , 120 S.Ct. 1680 , 146 L.Ed.2d 487 (2000)). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Tracy v. State
green
1 sentence2001Id. (citing Ladd v. State, 3 S.W.3d 547, 562 (Tex.Crim.App.1999), cert, denied, 529 U.S. 1070 , 120 S.Ct. 1680 , 146 L.Ed.2d 487 (2000)). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Long v. Knox
green
2 sentences1988After reviewing Long v. Knox, 155 Tex. 581 , 291 S.W.2d 292 (Tex.1956), the leading Supreme Court decision on judicial estoppel, we summarized the rule as follows: A party is judicially estopped in a subsequent proceeding by having alleged or admitted in pleadings in a former proceeding, under oath, the contrary of the assertion sought to be made in the subsequent proceeding, in the absence of proof that the averment in the former proceeding was made inadvertently or by mistake, fraud or duress. 1988After reviewing Long v. Knox, 155 Tex. 581 , 291 S.W.2d 292 (Tex.1956), the leading Supreme Court decision on judicial estoppel, we summarized the rule as follows: A party is judicially estopped in a subsequent proceeding by having alleged or admitted in pleadings in a former proceeding, under oath, the contrary of the assertion sought to be made in the subsequent proceeding, in the absence of proof that the averment in the former proceeding was made inadvertently or by mistake, fraud or duress. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Highway Contractors, Inc. v. West Texas Equipment Co.
green
2 sentences1988This Court analyzed the doctrine of judicial estoppel several years ago in Highway Contractors, Inc. v. West Tex. Equipment, 617 S.W.2d 791 (Tex.Civ.App. -Amarillo 1981, no writ). 1988This Court analyzed the doctrine of judicial estoppel several years ago in Highway Contractors, Inc. v. West Tex. Equipment, 617 S.W.2d 791 (Tex.Civ.App. —Amarillo 1981, no writ). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Matter of Carrillo
green
2 sentences1977In subsequent cases, In re Brown, 512 S.W.2d 317 (Tex.1974), and Matter of Carrillo, 542 S.W.2d 105 (Tex.1976), this court analyzed the doctrine and found it was not applicable. 1977In subsequent cases, In re Brown, 512 S.W.2d 317 (Tex.1974), and Matter of Carrillo, 542 S.W.2d 105 (Tex.1976), this court analyzed the doctrine and found it was not applicable. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
In Re Brown
green
2 sentences1977In subsequent cases, In re Brown, 512 S.W.2d 317 (Tex.1974), and Matter of Carrillo, 542 S.W.2d 105 (Tex.1976), this court analyzed the doctrine and found it was not applicable. 1977In subsequent cases, In re Brown, 512 S.W.2d 317 (Tex.1974), and Matter of Carrillo, 542 S.W.2d 105 (Tex.1976), this court analyzed the doctrine and found it was not applicable. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.