Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Exxon Pipeline Co. v. Zwahrgreen2 sentences2021See Zwahr, 88 S.W.3d at 629 (“Evidence that has no relationship to any issue in the case does not satisfy rule 702 and is thus inadmissible under rule 702.”); Camacho, 298 S.W.3d at 637 . 2015Id. | 1 | 2 |
Lincoln v. Clark Freight Lines, Inc.green1 sentence2015Evidence that has no relationship to any issue in the case does not satisfy rule 702 and is thus inadmissible under rule 702, as well as rules 401 and 402.″ (citations omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)); Gammill v. Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc., 972 S.W.2d 713, 720 (Tex. 1998) (″Unreliable evidence is of no assistance to the trier of fact and is therefore inadmissible under Rule 702.″); Lincoln v. Clark Freight Lines, Inc., 285 S.W.3d 79, 83 (Tex. App. - Houston [1st Dist.] 2009, no pet.) (″Unreliable scientific or technical evidence is of no assistance to the jury … .″); U.S. Rest. | 1 | 1 |
Gammill v. Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc.green1 sentence2015Evidence that has no relationship to any issue in the case does not satisfy rule 702 and is thus inadmissible under rule 702, as well as rules 401 and 402.″ (citations omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)); Gammill v. Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc., 972 S.W.2d 713, 720 (Tex. 1998) (″Unreliable evidence is of no assistance to the trier of fact and is therefore inadmissible under Rule 702.″); Lincoln v. Clark Freight Lines, Inc., 285 S.W.3d 79, 83 (Tex. App. - Houston [1st Dist.] 2009, no pet.) (″Unreliable scientific or technical evidence is of no assistance to the jury … .″); U.S. Rest. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Robinson
green
2 sentences2006Id. 2006Id. | 4 | 2002–2006 |
United States v. John W. Downing
green
2 sentences2018Id. 2016Id. | 2 | 2016–2018 |
Whirlpool Corp. v. Camacho
green
1 sentence2021See Zwahr, 88 S.W.3d at 629 (“Evidence that has no relationship to any issue in the case does not satisfy rule 702 and is thus inadmissible under rule 702.”); Camacho, 298 S.W.3d at 637 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |