Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1911–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Long v. Spencergreen2 sentences2025“An appeal at each step ‘provides a practical way to review controlling, intermediate decisions before the consequences of any error do irreparable injury.’” Id. (quoting Long, 137 S.W.3d at 926 ). 2017An appeal at each stage provides a practical way to review controlling, intermediate decisions before the consequences of any error do irreparable injury." Id. at 926 . | 2 | 6 |
In Re Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.green1 sentence2008In re Lumbermens, 184 S.W.3d 718, 727 (Tex. 2006) (explaining this factor is concerned only with prejudice caused by the delay in filing the motion to intervene, not the prejudice which may result if intervention is allowed). 11 The style of the case is modified to reflect the addition of Consolidated as a named party to this appeal. 8 practical way to review controlling, intermediate decisions before the consequences of any error do irreparable injury.” Id. at 926. | 1 | 1 |
Youngs v. Choicegreen1 sentence2004See Youngs v. Choice, 868 S.W.2d 850, 852 (Tex.App.Houston [14th Dist.] 1993, writ denied) (citing Christensen v. Harkins, 740 S.W.2d 69, 74 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1987, no writ)). | 1 | 1 |
Christensen v. Harkinsgreen1 sentence2004See Youngs v. Choice, 868 S.W.2d 850, 852 (Tex.App.Houston [14th Dist.] 1993, writ denied) (citing Christensen v. Harkins, 740 S.W.2d 69, 74 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1987, no writ)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Langford v. Carr
green
1 sentence2025“An appeal at each step ‘provides a practical way to review controlling, intermediate decisions before the consequences of any error do irreparable injury.’” Id. (quoting Long, 137 S.W.3d at 926 ). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Estate Land Co. v. Wiese
green
1 sentence2025“A partition order that disposes of all issues in a discrete phase of the proceeding must be appealed immediately under the usual time periods governing appeals; issues determined by the order cannot be attacked collaterally after a later order or judgment is signed.” Id. (citing Wiese, 546 S.W.3d at 325–26; Long, 137 S.W.3d at 925–26). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Smith v. Board of Supervisors
green
1 sentence1911The mere fact of such erasure did not put appellee upon notice that such erasure had been made without consent of the other sureties, and released them from liability. .Having-signed the note and intrusted it to Hess, upon them, and not upon appellee, must fall the consequences of any violation of duty by Hess to appellants. 32 Cyc. 46; Smith v. Peoria Co., 59 Ill. 412 ; Bank v. Boddicker, 105 Iowa, 548 , 75 N. W. 632 , 45 L. | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Benton County Savings Bank of Norway v. Boddicker
green
1 sentence1911The mere fact of such erasure did not put appellee upon notice that such erasure had been made without consent of the other sureties, and released them from liability. .Having-signed the note and intrusted it to Hess, upon them, and not upon appellee, must fall the consequences of any violation of duty by Hess to appellants. 32 Cyc. 46; Smith v. Peoria Co., 59 Ill. 412 ; Bank v. Boddicker, 105 Iowa, 548 , 75 N. W. 632 , 45 L. | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.