Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 2000–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Callaghan Ranch, Ltd. v. Killamgreen1 sentence2026P. 166a(i), cmt. to 1997 change; Callaghan Ranch, Ltd. v. Killam, 53 S.W.3d 1, 3 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2000, pet. denied); cf. White Rock Expl., Inc. v. Freeman Mills, P.C., 607 S.W.3d 429 , 438–39 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2020, no pet.) (holding movant’s motion for no-evidence summary judgment met the specificity requirements where the motion “included six paragraphs attacking the lack of evidence for the elements of the claims asserted” and “stated the elements of each claim and then stated the specific elements being challenged”). | 1 | 1 |
Jimmy Glen Riemer v. the State of Texas and Jerry Patterson, as Commissioner of the General Land Office of the State of Texasgreen1 sentence2023See, e.g., Riemer, 392 S.W.3d at 639 ; Bernal, 22 S.W.3d at 433, 435 (adopting rigorous analysis requirement from federal decisions). 4 TEX. | 1 | 1 |
Southwestern Refining Co., Inc. v. Bernalgreen1 sentence2023See, e.g., Riemer, 392 S.W.3d at 639 ; Bernal, 22 S.W.3d at 433, 435 (adopting rigorous analysis requirement from federal decisions). 4 TEX. | 1 | 1 |
In Re State Farm Lloyds, Inc.green1 sentence2020In re State Farm Lloyds, Inc., 170 S.W.3d 629, 634 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2005, orig. proceeding); Centeq Realty, Inc., 899 S.W.2d at 197 . | 1 | 1 |
PAS, INC. v. Engelgreen1 sentence2016See id. (stating that a claim for breach of fiduciary duty, unlike a fraud claim, does not require a plaintiff to establish reliance and holding that “the fact that at-will employment precludes PAS from establishing justifiable reliance for purposes of its fraud claim on alleged statements by Engel regarding future employment with PAS, ... does not bar its breach of fiduciary duty claim”). | 1 | 1 |
Griffin v. Californiagreen2 sentences2015While the elements of each claim are 615, 85 S.Ct. 1229, 1233 , 14 L.Ed.2d 106, 110 (1965). necessarily different, the proof required is all to be drawn However, "the Fifth Amendment does not forbid adverse from the same events. 2015While the elements of each claim are 615, 85 S.Ct. 1229, 1233 , 14 L.Ed.2d 106, 110 (1965). necessarily different, the proof required is all to be drawn However, "the Fifth Amendment does not forbid adverse from the same events. | 1 | 1 |
Baxter v. Palmigianogreen2 sentences2015The severance order is inferences against pmties to civil actions when they refuse interlocutory and nonappealable while the abatement is in to testify in response to probative evidence offered against effect. them." Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S . 308, 318, 96 S.Ct. 1551 , 1558, 47 L.Ed.2d 810, 821 (1976). 2015The severance order is inferences against pmties to civil actions when they refuse interlocutory and nonappealable while the abatement is in to testify in response to probative evidence offered against effect. them." Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S . 308, 318, 96 S.Ct. 1551 , 1558, 47 L.Ed.2d 810, 821 (1976). | 1 | 1 |
Daboub v. Gibbonsgreen1 sentence2000Daboub, 42 F.3d at 289-90 (preempting state law claims for conversion and misappropriation of trade secrets); see also Data Gen. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jose Fuentes Co., Inc., D/B/A Gloria's v. Mario Sabino's, Inc.
green
2 sentences2017Id. at 284 . 2015Id. | 3 | 2015–2017 |
Centeq Realty, Inc. v. Siegler
green
1 sentence2020In re State Farm Lloyds, Inc., 170 S.W.3d 629, 634 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2005, orig. proceeding); Centeq Realty, Inc., 899 S.W.2d at 197 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.