Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2001–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Killingsworth, Jerry v. the Housing Authority of the City of Dallasgreen1 sentence2022See id. –9– Waiver aside, the record reflects an adequate time for discovery had passed before the trial court heard the HOA’s motion. | 1 | 1 |
City of La Marque v. Braskeygreen2 sentences2018See City of La Marque v. Braskey, 216 S.W.3d 861, 864 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, pet. denied) (right is vested if it has definitive and not simply potential existence); see also Eldercare Props., Inc. v. Department of Human Servs., 63 S.W.3d 551, 556 (Tex. App.—Austin 2001, pet. denied)16 (“[A]ny right ElderCare has to additional beds is contingent on the HOA rule being triggered by high occupancy levels of Medicaid beds in the county and on ElderCare applying for the additional beds made available by the rule. 2018See City of La Marque v. Braskey, 216 S.W.3d 861, 864 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, pet. denied) (right is vested if it has definitive and not simply potential existence); see also Eldercare Props., Inc. v. Department of Human Servs., 63 S.W.3d 551, 556 (Tex. App.—Austin 2001, pet. denied)16 (“[A]ny right ElderCare has to additional beds is contingent on the HOA rule being triggered by high occupancy levels of Medicaid beds in the county and on ElderCare applying for the additional beds made available by the rule. | 1 | 1 |
Embrey v. Royal Insurance Co. of Americagreen1 sentence2018Co. of Am., 22 S.W.3d 414, 416 (Tex. 2000). 13 The Developer’s remaining issues on appeal are: • Issue one - the trial court erred in granting the HOA’s motion because the HOA failed to prove the Amendment was invalid; • Issue three - the Repsdorph Property was not conveyed to the HOA because the Declaration did not contain any “words of conveyance;” • Issue four - the Repsdorph Property was not conveyed to the HOA because it was not in existence at the time the Declaration was filed; and • Issue five – the re-plat effectively amended the Declaration. | 1 | 1 |
Raman Chandler Properties, L.C. v. Caldwell's Creek Homeowners Ass'ngreen1 sentence2018See Raman Chandler Props., L.C. v. Caldwell’s Creek Homeowners Ass’n, Inc., 178 S.W.3d 384, 394 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2005, pet. denied) (recognizing plat dedication of open space common areas to be maintained for benefit of homeowners’ association). | 1 | 1 |
Solar Soccer Club v. Prince of Peace Lutheran Church of Carrolltongreen1 sentence2018See Solar Soccer Club v. Prince of Peace Lutheran Church of Carrollton, 234 S.W.3d 814, 831 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2007, pet. denied)(trial court has broad discretion in determining amount of security). | 1 | 1 |
ElderCare Properties, Inc. v. Texas Department of Human Servicesgreen2 sentences2018See City of La Marque v. Braskey, 216 S.W.3d 861, 864 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, pet. denied) (right is vested if it has definitive and not simply potential existence); see also Eldercare Props., Inc. v. Department of Human Servs., 63 S.W.3d 551, 556 (Tex. App.—Austin 2001, pet. denied)16 (“[A]ny right ElderCare has to additional beds is contingent on the HOA rule being triggered by high occupancy levels of Medicaid beds in the county and on ElderCare applying for the additional beds made available by the rule. 2018See City of La Marque v. Braskey, 216 S.W.3d 861, 864 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, pet. denied) (right is vested if it has definitive and not simply potential existence); see also Eldercare Props., Inc. v. Department of Human Servs., 63 S.W.3d 551, 556 (Tex. App.—Austin 2001, pet. denied)16 (“[A]ny right ElderCare has to additional beds is contingent on the HOA rule being triggered by high occupancy levels of Medicaid beds in the county and on ElderCare applying for the additional beds made available by the rule. | 1 | 1 |
Roberson v. Odomgreen1 sentence2018Roberson v. Odom, 529 S.W.3d 498, 502 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2017, no pet.). 5 • HOA’s claim was invalid because of the Amendment; and • the Repsdorph Property is not on the re-plat. | 1 | 1 |
Patino v. Complete Tire, Inc.green1 sentence2015See Patino, 158 S.W.3d at 659 . | 1 | 1 |
Ashcreek Homeowner's Ass'n, Inc. v. Smithgreen1 sentence2015See Ashcreek Homeowner’s Ass’n, Inc. v. Smith, 902 S.W.2d 586, 589-90 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1995, no writ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Texas Department of Human Services v. Christian Care Centers, Inc.
green
2 sentences2001Christian Care, 826 S.W.2d at 719 . 2001Christian Care, 826 S.W.2d at 719 . | 3 | 2001–2001 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.