Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jensen v. Jensengreen2 sentences2025See Jensen v. Jensen, 665 S.W.2d 107 (Tex. 1984). 2025See Jensen v. Jensen, 665 S.W.2d 107 (Tex. 1984). | 3 | 3 |
Lifshutz v. Lifshutzgreen2 sentences2025See Lifshutz v. Lifshutz, 199 S.W.3d 9, 29 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2006, pet. denied) (holding wife failed to prove Jensen claim where she offered no evidence of value of husband's TTT&E). 2022Lifshutz, 199 S.W.3d at 29 (holding wife failed to prove Jensen claim because she did not present evidence of value of husband’s uncompensated time and labor). | 2 | 2 |
Dallas County Community College District v. Boltongreen2 sentences2007Our holding on this issue merely meant that we would consider Miga's other issues on appeal. [1] RESTATEMENT (FIRST) OF RESTITUTION § 112 (1937) ("A person who without mistake, coercion or request has unconditionally conferred a benefit upon another is not entitled to restitution, except where the benefit was conferred under circumstances making such action necessary for the protection of the interests of the other or of third persons."); see also Dallas County Community College Dist. v. Bolton, 185 S.W.3d 868, 883 (Tex.2005) (students not entitled to refund of fees because payment was volunta 2006Our holding on this issue merely meant that we would consider Miga’s other issues on appeal. 1: Restatement (First) of Restitution § 112 (1937) (“A person who without mistake, coercion or request has unconditionally conferred a benefit upon another is not entitled to restitution, except where the benefit was conferred under circumstances making such action necessary for the protection of the interests of the other or of third persons.”); see also Dallas County Community College Dist. v. Bolton , 185 S.W.3d 868, 883 (Tex. 2005) (students not entitled to refund of fees because payment was volunt | 2 | 2 |
Miga v. Jensengreen2 sentences2007See 96 S.W.3d at 211-12 . 2007See 96 S.W.3d at 211-12 . | 2 | 2 |
Hamm v. Millennium Income Fund, L.L.C.green2 sentences2020See Provost, 2020 WL 1182041 , at *2 (concluding appellant’s challenge to the arbitration award was waived when appellant did not file a motion challenging the arbitration award until one month after the trial court had signed the order confirming the arbitration award); Hamm, 178 S.W.3d at 268 (noting that a party who moves to vacate, modify, or correct an arbitration award after the award has been confirmed and final judgment rendered has waived that challenge). 2020Because Heilmann’s motions to vacate or modify the arbitration awards were not raised or considered before or simultaneously with Jensen’s motion to confirm the arbitration awards, Heilmann waived these complaints, and “absent specific common-law or statutory grounds for vacating, modifying, or correcting an award, the reviewing court must confirm it.” See id. at 268 ; TEX. | 1 | 2 |
Gutierrez v. Gutierrezgreen2 sentences2025See Gutierrez v. Gutierrez, 791 S.W.2d 659, 665 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1990, no pet.). - 11 - 04-24-00191-CV In this case, the summary judgment evidence shows that Wilson received $1,800 per week from Rebel from 2002 to 2015/2016 and approximately $8,000 per month from 2015/2016 until his death. 2025See Gutierrez v. Gutierrez, 791 S.W.2d 659, 665 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1990, no pet.). - 11 - 04-24-00191-CV In this case, the summary judgment evidence shows that Wilson received $1,800 per week from Rebel from 2002 to 2015/2016 and approximately $8,000 per month from 2015/2016 until his death. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
American Dredging Co. v. Miller
green
2 sentences1999See id.; American Dredging Co. v. Miller, 510 U.S. 443, 447 , 114 S.Ct. 981 , 127 L.Ed.2d 285 (1994). 1999See id.; American Dredging Co. v. Miller, 510 U.S. 443, 447 , 114 S.Ct. 981 , 127 L.Ed.2d 285 (1994). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.