Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cire v. Cummingsgreen2 sentences2018It “must either consider lesser sanctions on the record or test lesser sanctions.” Knoderer v. State Farm Lloyds, No. 06- 13-00027-CV, 2014 WL 4699136 , at *10 (Tex. App.—Texarkana Sept. 19, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op.) (“[I]n all but the most exceptional cases, the trial court must actually test the lesser sanctions before striking the pleadings.”) (quoting Cire, 134 S.W.3d at 840 ). “[C]ase-determinative sanctions may be imposed only in exceptional cases where they are clearly justified and it is ‘fully apparent that no lesser sanctions would promote compliance with the rules.’” Id. at *11 (quo 2018It “must either consider lesser sanctions on the record or test lesser sanctions.” Knoderer v. State Farm Lloyds, No. 06- 13-00027-CV, 2014 WL 4699136 , at *10 (Tex. App.—Texarkana Sept. 19, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op.) (“[I]n all but the most exceptional cases, the trial court must actually test the lesser sanctions before striking the pleadings.”) (quoting Cire, 134 S.W.3d at 840 ). “[C]ase-determinative sanctions may be imposed only in exceptional cases where they are clearly justified and it is ‘fully apparent that no lesser sanctions would promote compliance with the rules.’” Id. at *11 (quo | 1 | 7 |
Ross v. NAT. CTR. FOR EMPLOY. OF DISABLEDgreen1 sentence2018It “must either consider lesser sanctions on the record or test lesser sanctions.” Knoderer v. State Farm Lloyds, No. 06- 13-00027-CV, 2014 WL 4699136 , at *10 (Tex. App.—Texarkana Sept. 19, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op.) (“[I]n all but the most exceptional cases, the trial court must actually test the lesser sanctions before striking the pleadings.”) (quoting Cire, 134 S.W.3d at 840 ). “[C]ase-determinative sanctions may be imposed only in exceptional cases where they are clearly justified and it is ‘fully apparent that no lesser sanctions would promote compliance with the rules.’” Id. at *11 (quo | 1 | 1 |
In the Interest of M.J.M., a Childgreen1 sentence2015In re Carnival Corp., 193 S.W.3d 229, 236-37 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding); see also In re M.J.M., 406 S.W.3d 292, 298 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2013, orig. proceeding). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Carnival Corp.green1 sentence2015In re Carnival Corp., 193 S.W.3d 229, 236-37 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding); see also In re M.J.M., 406 S.W.3d 292, 298 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2013, orig. proceeding). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
GTE Communications Systems Corp. v. Tanner
green
1 sentence2004GTE, 856 S.W.2d at 730 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |