Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1977–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
McElroy v. Stategreen2 sentences2015McElroy v. State, 720 S.W.2d 490, 493 (Tex. Crim. 1987The general rule is that “where a penal statute embraces an exception which is part of the statute itself ... it is necessary for the state to negate such an exception in the indictment.” McElroy v. State, 720 S.W.2d 490, 493 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), quoting Threlkeld v. State, 558 S.W.2d 472, 473 (Tex.Crim.App.1977); see Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 2.02 (Vernon 1974). | 3 | 3 |
Threlkeld v. Stategreen2 sentences1987The general rule is that “where a penal statute embraces an exception which is part of the statute itself ... it is necessary for the state to negate such an exception in the indictment.” McElroy v. State, 720 S.W.2d 490, 493 (Tex.Crim.App.1986), quoting Threlkeld v. State, 558 S.W.2d 472, 473 (Tex.Crim.App.1977); see Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 2.02 (Vernon 1974). 1987The common law cited in McElroy, is that “where a penal statute embraces an exception which is part of the statute itself, or the exception appears with the enacting clause of the law, it is necessary for the State to negate such an exception in the indictment.” Threlkeld v. State, 558 S.W. 2d 472, 473 (Tex.Crim.App.1977). | 3 | 3 |
Lopez v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Lopez v. State, 846 S.W.2d 90, 93 (Tex. App.--Corpus Christi 1992, pet. ref’d). 2005Lopez, 846 S.W.2d at 93 . | 1 | 2 |
Rosamond v. Stategreen2 sentences1992Rosamond v. State, 730 S.W.2d 147, 148 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.). 1992Rosamond v. State, 730 S.W.2d 147, 148 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Baker v. State
green
2 sentences1987It is necessary to refer for clarification to Baker v. State, 132 Tex.Crim. 527 , 106 S.W.2d 308 (Tex.Crim.App.1937), the leading case on the issue that is cited by the Threlkeld court. 1987It is necessary to refer for clarification to Baker v. State, 132 Tex.Crim. 527 , 106 S.W.2d 308 (Tex.Crim.App.1937), the leading case on the issue that is cited by the Threlkeld court. | 2 | 1977–1987 |
Ford v. State
neutral
1 sentence1977Baker v. State, 132 Tex.Cr.R. 527 , 106 S.W.2d 308 (1937); Ford v. State, 105 Tex.Cr.R. 114 , 286 S.W. 1089 (1926); Moore v. State, 90 Tex.Cr.R. 604 , 236 S.W. 477 (1922). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Ford v. State
neutral
1 sentence1977Baker v. State, 132 Tex.Cr.R. 527 , 106 S.W.2d 308 (1937); Ford v. State, 105 Tex.Cr.R. 114 , 286 S.W. 1089 (1926); Moore v. State, 90 Tex.Cr.R. 604 , 236 S.W. 477 (1922). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Jones v. State
neutral
2 sentences1977Baker v. State, 132 Tex.Cr.R. 527 , 106 S.W.2d 308 (1937); Ford v. State, 105 Tex.Cr.R. 114 , 286 S.W. 1089 (1926); Moore v. State, 90 Tex.Cr.R. 604 , 236 S.W. 477 (1922). 1977Baker v. State, 132 Tex.Cr.R. 527 , 106 S.W.2d 308 (1937); Ford v. State, 105 Tex.Cr.R. 114 , 286 S.W. 1089 (1926); Moore v. State, 90 Tex.Cr.R. 604 , 236 S.W. 477 (1922). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.