Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1897–1981 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cooper v. Martin Brown Co.
neutral
2 sentences1981Cooper v. Martin-Brown Co., 78 Tex. 219 , 14 S.W. 577 (1890). 1981Cooper v. Martin-Brown Co., 78 Tex. 219 , 14 S.W. 577 (1890). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Marshburn v. Stewart
neutral
1 sentence1959Smith v. Estill, 87 Tex. 264 , 28 S.W. 801 ; Gosch v. Vrana, Tex.Civ.App.1914, 167 S.W. 757 , ref.; Marshburn v. Stewart, 1923, 113 Tex. 507 , 254 S.W. 942 , bot. 1st. col. at page 945; Easterling v. Murphey, Tex.Civ.App.1928, 11 S.W.2d 329 , ref.; Lasater v. Hinson, Tex.Civ.App.1935, 84 S.W.2d 874 , no writ history; Strong v. Strong, 1936, 128 Tex. 470 , 98 S.W.2d 346 , 109 A.L.R. 739 ; Matthews v. Rains County, 1947, Tex.Civ.App., 206 S.W.2d 852 , ref., n. r. e.; Wessels v. Rio Bravo Oil Co., Tex. Civ.App.1952, 250 S.W.2d 668 ; 43-B Tex. Jur. 35, Sec. 730, et seq. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Strong v. Strong
green
1 sentence1959Smith v. Estill, 87 Tex. 264 , 28 S.W. 801 ; Gosch v. Vrana, Tex.Civ.App.1914, 167 S.W. 757 , ref.; Marshburn v. Stewart, 1923, 113 Tex. 507 , 254 S.W. 942 , bot. 1st. col. at page 945; Easterling v. Murphey, Tex.Civ.App.1928, 11 S.W.2d 329 , ref.; Lasater v. Hinson, Tex.Civ.App.1935, 84 S.W.2d 874 , no writ history; Strong v. Strong, 1936, 128 Tex. 470 , 98 S.W.2d 346 , 109 A.L.R. 739 ; Matthews v. Rains County, 1947, Tex.Civ.App., 206 S.W.2d 852 , ref., n. r. e.; Wessels v. Rio Bravo Oil Co., Tex. Civ.App.1952, 250 S.W.2d 668 ; 43-B Tex. Jur. 35, Sec. 730, et seq. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Matthews v. Rains County
green
1 sentence1959Smith v. Estill, 87 Tex. 264 , 28 S.W. 801 ; Gosch v. Vrana, Tex.Civ.App.1914, 167 S.W. 757 , ref.; Marshburn v. Stewart, 1923, 113 Tex. 507 , 254 S.W. 942 , bot. 1st. col. at page 945; Easterling v. Murphey, Tex.Civ.App.1928, 11 S.W.2d 329 , ref.; Lasater v. Hinson, Tex.Civ.App.1935, 84 S.W.2d 874 , no writ history; Strong v. Strong, 1936, 128 Tex. 470 , 98 S.W.2d 346 , 109 A.L.R. 739 ; Matthews v. Rains County, 1947, Tex.Civ.App., 206 S.W.2d 852 , ref., n. r. e.; Wessels v. Rio Bravo Oil Co., Tex. Civ.App.1952, 250 S.W.2d 668 ; 43-B Tex. Jur. 35, Sec. 730, et seq. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Wessels v. Rio Bravo Oil Co.
green
1 sentence1959Smith v. Estill, 87 Tex. 264 , 28 S.W. 801 ; Gosch v. Vrana, Tex.Civ.App.1914, 167 S.W. 757 , ref.; Marshburn v. Stewart, 1923, 113 Tex. 507 , 254 S.W. 942 , bot. 1st. col. at page 945; Easterling v. Murphey, Tex.Civ.App.1928, 11 S.W.2d 329 , ref.; Lasater v. Hinson, Tex.Civ.App.1935, 84 S.W.2d 874 , no writ history; Strong v. Strong, 1936, 128 Tex. 470 , 98 S.W.2d 346 , 109 A.L.R. 739 ; Matthews v. Rains County, 1947, Tex.Civ.App., 206 S.W.2d 852 , ref., n. r. e.; Wessels v. Rio Bravo Oil Co., Tex. Civ.App.1952, 250 S.W.2d 668 ; 43-B Tex. Jur. 35, Sec. 730, et seq. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Marshburn v. Stewart
neutral
1 sentence1959Smith v. Estill, 87 Tex. 264 , 28 S.W. 801 ; Gosch v. Vrana, Tex.Civ.App.1914, 167 S.W. 757 , ref.; Marshburn v. Stewart, 1923, 113 Tex. 507 , 254 S.W. 942 , bot. 1st. col. at page 945; Easterling v. Murphey, Tex.Civ.App.1928, 11 S.W.2d 329 , ref.; Lasater v. Hinson, Tex.Civ.App.1935, 84 S.W.2d 874 , no writ history; Strong v. Strong, 1936, 128 Tex. 470 , 98 S.W.2d 346 , 109 A.L.R. 739 ; Matthews v. Rains County, 1947, Tex.Civ.App., 206 S.W.2d 852 , ref., n. r. e.; Wessels v. Rio Bravo Oil Co., Tex. Civ.App.1952, 250 S.W.2d 668 ; 43-B Tex. Jur. 35, Sec. 730, et seq. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Strong v. Strong
green
2 sentences1959Smith v. Estill, 87 Tex. 264 , 28 S.W. 801 ; Gosch v. Vrana, Tex.Civ.App.1914, 167 S.W. 757 , ref.; Marshburn v. Stewart, 1923, 113 Tex. 507 , 254 S.W. 942 , bot. 1st. col. at page 945; Easterling v. Murphey, Tex.Civ.App.1928, 11 S.W.2d 329 , ref.; Lasater v. Hinson, Tex.Civ.App.1935, 84 S.W.2d 874 , no writ history; Strong v. Strong, 1936, 128 Tex. 470 , 98 S.W.2d 346 , 109 A.L.R. 739 ; Matthews v. Rains County, 1947, Tex.Civ.App., 206 S.W.2d 852 , ref., n. r. e.; Wessels v. Rio Bravo Oil Co., Tex. Civ.App.1952, 250 S.W.2d 668 ; 43-B Tex. Jur. 35, Sec. 730, et seq. 1959Smith v. Estill, 87 Tex. 264 , 28 S.W. 801 ; Gosch v. Vrana, Tex.Civ.App.1914, 167 S.W. 757 , ref.; Marshburn v. Stewart, 1923, 113 Tex. 507 , 254 S.W. 942 , bot. 1st. col. at page 945; Easterling v. Murphey, Tex.Civ.App.1928, 11 S.W.2d 329 , ref.; Lasater v. Hinson, Tex.Civ.App.1935, 84 S.W.2d 874 , no writ history; Strong v. Strong, 1936, 128 Tex. 470 , 98 S.W.2d 346 , 109 A.L.R. 739 ; Matthews v. Rains County, 1947, Tex.Civ.App., 206 S.W.2d 852 , ref., n. r. e.; Wessels v. Rio Bravo Oil Co., Tex. Civ.App.1952, 250 S.W.2d 668 ; 43-B Tex. Jur. 35, Sec. 730, et seq. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Easterling v. Murphey
green
1 sentence1959Smith v. Estill, 87 Tex. 264 , 28 S.W. 801 ; Gosch v. Vrana, Tex.Civ.App.1914, 167 S.W. 757 , ref.; Marshburn v. Stewart, 1923, 113 Tex. 507 , 254 S.W. 942 , bot. 1st. col. at page 945; Easterling v. Murphey, Tex.Civ.App.1928, 11 S.W.2d 329 , ref.; Lasater v. Hinson, Tex.Civ.App.1935, 84 S.W.2d 874 , no writ history; Strong v. Strong, 1936, 128 Tex. 470 , 98 S.W.2d 346 , 109 A.L.R. 739 ; Matthews v. Rains County, 1947, Tex.Civ.App., 206 S.W.2d 852 , ref., n. r. e.; Wessels v. Rio Bravo Oil Co., Tex. Civ.App.1952, 250 S.W.2d 668 ; 43-B Tex. Jur. 35, Sec. 730, et seq. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Lasater v. Hinson
neutral
1 sentence1959Smith v. Estill, 87 Tex. 264 , 28 S.W. 801 ; Gosch v. Vrana, Tex.Civ.App.1914, 167 S.W. 757 , ref.; Marshburn v. Stewart, 1923, 113 Tex. 507 , 254 S.W. 942 , bot. 1st. col. at page 945; Easterling v. Murphey, Tex.Civ.App.1928, 11 S.W.2d 329 , ref.; Lasater v. Hinson, Tex.Civ.App.1935, 84 S.W.2d 874 , no writ history; Strong v. Strong, 1936, 128 Tex. 470 , 98 S.W.2d 346 , 109 A.L.R. 739 ; Matthews v. Rains County, 1947, Tex.Civ.App., 206 S.W.2d 852 , ref., n. r. e.; Wessels v. Rio Bravo Oil Co., Tex. Civ.App.1952, 250 S.W.2d 668 ; 43-B Tex. Jur. 35, Sec. 730, et seq. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Gosch v. Vrana
green
1 sentence1959Smith v. Estill, 87 Tex. 264 , 28 S.W. 801 ; Gosch v. Vrana, Tex.Civ.App.1914, 167 S.W. 757 , ref.; Marshburn v. Stewart, 1923, 113 Tex. 507 , 254 S.W. 942 , bot. 1st. col. at page 945; Easterling v. Murphey, Tex.Civ.App.1928, 11 S.W.2d 329 , ref.; Lasater v. Hinson, Tex.Civ.App.1935, 84 S.W.2d 874 , no writ history; Strong v. Strong, 1936, 128 Tex. 470 , 98 S.W.2d 346 , 109 A.L.R. 739 ; Matthews v. Rains County, 1947, Tex.Civ.App., 206 S.W.2d 852 , ref., n. r. e.; Wessels v. Rio Bravo Oil Co., Tex. Civ.App.1952, 250 S.W.2d 668 ; 43-B Tex. Jur. 35, Sec. 730, et seq. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Smith v. Estill
green
2 sentences1959Smith v. Estill, 87 Tex. 264 , 28 S.W. 801 ; Gosch v. Vrana, Tex.Civ.App.1914, 167 S.W. 757 , ref.; Marshburn v. Stewart, 1923, 113 Tex. 507 , 254 S.W. 942 , bot. 1st. col. at page 945; Easterling v. Murphey, Tex.Civ.App.1928, 11 S.W.2d 329 , ref.; Lasater v. Hinson, Tex.Civ.App.1935, 84 S.W.2d 874 , no writ history; Strong v. Strong, 1936, 128 Tex. 470 , 98 S.W.2d 346 , 109 A.L.R. 739 ; Matthews v. Rains County, 1947, Tex.Civ.App., 206 S.W.2d 852 , ref., n. r. e.; Wessels v. Rio Bravo Oil Co., Tex. Civ.App.1952, 250 S.W.2d 668 ; 43-B Tex. Jur. 35, Sec. 730, et seq. 1959Smith v. Estill, 87 Tex. 264 , 28 S.W. 801 ; Gosch v. Vrana, Tex.Civ.App.1914, 167 S.W. 757 , ref.; Marshburn v. Stewart, 1923, 113 Tex. 507 , 254 S.W. 942 , bot. 1st. col. at page 945; Easterling v. Murphey, Tex.Civ.App.1928, 11 S.W.2d 329 , ref.; Lasater v. Hinson, Tex.Civ.App.1935, 84 S.W.2d 874 , no writ history; Strong v. Strong, 1936, 128 Tex. 470 , 98 S.W.2d 346 , 109 A.L.R. 739 ; Matthews v. Rains County, 1947, Tex.Civ.App., 206 S.W.2d 852 , ref., n. r. e.; Wessels v. Rio Bravo Oil Co., Tex. Civ.App.1952, 250 S.W.2d 668 ; 43-B Tex. Jur. 35, Sec. 730, et seq. | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Sanger Bros. v. Colbert
green
2 sentences1947Sanger Bros. v. Colbert, 84 Tex. 668, 673 , 19 S.W. 863 ; 20 Tex.Jur. 405; Art. 3996; Art. 1995, Subd. 7. 1947Sanger Bros. v. Colbert, 84 Tex. 668, 673 , 19 S.W. 863 ; 20 Tex.Jur. 405; Art. 3996; Art. 1995, Subd. 7. | 1 | 1947–1947 |
Kaufman Oil Mill v. North Texas Nat. Bank in Dallas
green
1 sentence1934Statements are found in the decisions, as for example in Kaufman Oil Mill v. North Texas National Bank, 16 S. W. (2d), 143 (application for writ of error refused), to the effect that such evidence, as would be admissable in an ordinary case to show that the purchaser had knowledge of facts that should put a reasonably prudent person upon inquiry, is admissible as tending to prove that the purchaser of a negotiable instrument in taking it with knowledge of such facts acted. in bad faith. | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Western Cottage Piano & Organ Co. v. Griffin
neutral
1 sentence1933App. 76 , 90 S. W. 884 ; -, But to the contrary, or at least as engraft-ing a qualification thereupon, are decisions; holding that the defrauded party is under no duty to make an investigation to discover the existence of fraud unless and until he acquires knowledge of facts to put a reasonably prudent person upon inquiry. | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Ripley v. Withee
neutral
1 sentence1933Ripley v. Withee, 27 Tex. 14 ; Anding v. Perkins, 29 Tex. 348 ; Emerson v. Navarro, 31 Tex. 335 , 98 Am. | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Anding v. Perkins
neutral
1 sentence1933Ripley v. Withee, 27 Tex. 14 ; Anding v. Perkins, 29 Tex. 348 ; Emerson v. Navarro, 31 Tex. 335 , 98 Am. | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Richardson v. Houston Oil Co. of Texas
green
1 sentence1932Appellees’ contentions find no support from the opinion of this court in the case of Richardson v. Houston Oil Co., 176 S. W. 628, 631 , in which, after stating the general rule that a tenant is estopped from disputing the title of his landlord, it is said: “It is equally well settled by the authorities that this rule of estoppel applies with full force to one who obtains or claims possession through or under the tenant of another. | 1 | 1932–1932 |
Bacon v. O'Connor
neutral
1 sentence1921The evidence upon this point was largely circumstantial, but we have no doubt that there was sufficient evidence to support the finding of the jury, under the principles of the following authorities: Bacon v. O'Connor, 25 Tex. 213 ; Moody v. Martin, 117 S.W. 1015 ; Sickles v. White, 66 Tex. 179 , 17 S.W. 543 ; Littleton Clay v. Giddings, 47 Tex. 109 ; Brotherton v. Weathersby, 73 Tex. 473 , 11 S.W. 505 ; LaBrie v. Cartwright, 55 Tex. Civ. | 1 | 1921–1921 |
Littleton v. Giddings
neutral
1 sentence1921The evidence upon this point was largely circumstantial, but we have no doubt that there was sufficient evidence to support the finding of the jury, under the principles of the following authorities: Bacon v. O'Connor, 25 Tex. 213 ; Moody v. Martin, 117 S.W. 1015 ; Sickles v. White, 66 Tex. 179 , 17 S.W. 543 ; Littleton Clay v. Giddings, 47 Tex. 109 ; Brotherton v. Weathersby, 73 Tex. 473 , 11 S.W. 505 ; LaBrie v. Cartwright, 55 Tex. Civ. | 1 | 1921–1921 |
Brotherton v. Weathersby
green
1 sentence1921The evidence upon this point was largely circumstantial, but we have no doubt that there was sufficient evidence to support the finding of the jury, under the principles of the following authorities: Bacon v. O'Connor, 25 Tex. 213 ; Moody v. Martin, 117 S.W. 1015 ; Sickles v. White, 66 Tex. 179 , 17 S.W. 543 ; Littleton Clay v. Giddings, 47 Tex. 109 ; Brotherton v. Weathersby, 73 Tex. 473 , 11 S.W. 505 ; LaBrie v. Cartwright, 55 Tex. Civ. | 1 | 1921–1921 |
Sickles v. White
neutral
1 sentence1921The evidence upon this point was largely circumstantial, but we have no doubt that there was sufficient evidence to support the finding of the jury, under the principles of the following authorities: Bacon v. O'Connor, 25 Tex. 213 ; Moody v. Martin, 117 S.W. 1015 ; Sickles v. White, 66 Tex. 179 , 17 S.W. 543 ; Littleton Clay v. Giddings, 47 Tex. 109 ; Brotherton v. Weathersby, 73 Tex. 473 , 11 S.W. 505 ; LaBrie v. Cartwright, 55 Tex. Civ. | 1 | 1921–1921 |
Labrie v. Cartwright
green
1 sentence1921The evidence upon this point was largely circumstantial, but we have no doubt that there was sufficient evidence to support the finding of the jury, under the principles of the following authorities: Bacon v. O'Connor, 25 Tex. 213 ; Moody v. Martin, 117 S.W. 1015 ; Sickles v. White, 66 Tex. 179 , 17 S.W. 543 ; Littleton Clay v. Giddings, 47 Tex. 109 ; Brotherton v. Weathersby, 73 Tex. 473 , 11 S.W. 505 ; LaBrie v. Cartwright, 55 Tex. Civ. | 1 | 1921–1921 |
Wells v. Houston
green
1 sentence1913Eq. § 965; Wells v. Houston, 23 Tex. Civ. | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Pendarvis v. Gray
green
1 sentence1913Pendarvis v. Gray, 41 Tex. 326 .” But it is also well settled that, where one seeks to rescind a contract on the ground of fraud or mutual mistake, he must do so promptly on discovering the fraud or mistake; and if after such discovery, or after receiving such information as would put a reasonably prudent person upon inquiry which if pursued would lead to the discovery of the fraud or mistake, he does anything in confirmation of the contract, he cannot thereafter rescind it. 2 Pom. | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Houston & Texas Central Railway Co. v. Shirley
neutral
1 sentence1897Railway v. Shirley, 89 Texas, 95 . | 1 | 1897–1897 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.