Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Glencoe Capital Partners II, L.P. v. Gernsbachergreen2 sentences2011Genio’s action against Smart Call is a simple breach-of-contract claim, and it alleges Smart Call breached the contract at the Texas meeting. 8 See Glencoe Capital Partners II, L.P. v. Gernsbacher, 269 S.W.3d 157, 167 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2008, no pet.) (“Unlike the misrepresentations in Moki Mac, which were tangential to the plaintiffs’ core negligence claim, Appellants’ misrepresentations in this case are the core of Appellees’ claims.”). 2011Genio’s action against Smart Call is a simple breach-of-contract claim, and it alleges Smart Call breached the contract at the Texas meeting. [8] See Glencoe Capital Partners II, L.P. v. Gernsbacher , 269 S.W.3d 157, 167 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2008, no pet.) (“Unlike the misrepresentations in Moki Mac , which were tangential to the plaintiffs’ core negligence claim, Appellants’ misrepresentations in this case are the core of Appellees’ claims.”). | 2 | 2 |
Riddick v. Quail Harbor Condominium Ass'ngreen2 sentences2006Ass’n, 7 S.W.3d 663, 670 (Tex.App.Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, no pet.) (stating that a simple breach-of-contract claim is neither a DTPA violation nor an unconscionable act). 2006Ass = n , 7 S.W.3d 663, 670 (Tex. App. C Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, no pet.) (stating that a simple breach-of-contract claim is neither a DTPA violation nor an unconscionable act). | 2 | 2 |
Gulf States Underwriters of Louisiana, Inc. v. Wilsongreen2 sentences1999Because we find that this case fits the principle that a simple breach of contract claim is not a DTPA violation, this construction has also been extended to cover allegations of unconscionable acts as well, Gulf States Underwriters of Louisiana, Inc. v. Wilson, 753 S.W.2d 422, 430 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 1988, writ denied). 1992Gulf States Underwriters, Inc. v. Wilson, 753 S.W.2d 422, 430 (Tex.App.—Beaumont 1988, writ denied). | 2 | 2 |
Francie Willis v. Bpmt, Llcgreen1 sentence2016Willis v. BPMT, LLC, 471 S.W.3d 27, 34 (Tex. App.— Houston [1st Dist.] 2015, no pet.) (noting that statutory definition of debt “has since been repealed, which indicates both that the Legislature no longer required that specific understanding of ‘debt’ to apply to a case arising under chapter 171, and also that the Legislature would have anticipated that the courts would revert to applying the understanding of ‘debt’ that prevailed before the statutory definition was enacted.”). 26 completed before corporate privileges were forfeited,” “the claims asserted by [the plaintiff] in the underlying | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Valero Energy Corp. v. Wagner & Brown, II
green
2 sentences2015TEX.REV.CIV.STAT.ANN. art. 224 (Vernon Supp. 1995); Valero, 777 S.W.2d at 566 . 1995Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 224 (Vernon Supp.1995); Valero, 777 S.W.2d at 566 . | 2 | 1995–2015 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.