Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2008–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Weaver v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.green2 sentences2011In Crocker , the supreme court explained that “notice and delivery-of-suit-papers provisions in insurance policies serve two essential purposes: (1) they facilitate a timely and effective defense of the claim against the insured and, more fundamentally, (2) they trigger the insurer’s duty to defend by notifying the insurer that a defense is expected.” Id. at 608 (citing Weaver, 570 S.W.2d at 368 -70 and Harwell, 896 S.W.2d at 172, 174 ). 2010In Crocker , the supreme court explained that "notice and delivery-of-suit-papers provisions in insurance policies serve two essential purposes: (1) they facilitate a timely and effective defense of the claim against the insured, and more fundamentally, (2) they trigger the insurer's duty to defend by notifying the insurer that a defense is expected." Id. at 608 (citing Weaver, 570 S.W.2d at 368 -70 and Harwell, 896 S.W.2d at 172, 174 ). | 3 | 8 |
Harwell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.green2 sentences2011In Crocker , the supreme court explained that “notice and delivery-of-suit-papers provisions in insurance policies serve two essential purposes: (1) they facilitate a timely and effective defense of the claim against the insured and, more fundamentally, (2) they trigger the insurer’s duty to defend by notifying the insurer that a defense is expected.” Id. at 608 (citing Weaver, 570 S.W.2d at 368 -70 and Harwell, 896 S.W.2d at 172, 174 ). 2010In Crocker , the supreme court explained that "notice and delivery-of-suit-papers provisions in insurance policies serve two essential purposes: (1) they facilitate a timely and effective defense of the claim against the insured, and more fundamentally, (2) they trigger the insurer's duty to defend by notifying the insurer that a defense is expected." Id. at 608 (citing Weaver, 570 S.W.2d at 368 -70 and Harwell, 896 S.W.2d at 172, 174 ). | 3 | 6 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Crocker
green
2 sentences2011In Crocker , the supreme court explained that “notice and delivery-of-suit-papers provisions in insurance policies serve two essential purposes: (1) they facilitate a timely and effective defense of the claim against the insured and, more fundamentally, (2) they trigger the insurer’s duty to defend by notifying the insurer that a defense is expected.” Id. at 608 (citing Weaver, 570 S.W.2d at 368 -70 and Harwell, 896 S.W.2d at 172, 174 ). 2010In Crocker , the supreme court explained that "notice and delivery-of-suit-papers provisions in insurance policies serve two essential purposes: (1) they facilitate a timely and effective defense of the claim against the insured, and more fundamentally, (2) they trigger the insurer's duty to defend by notifying the insurer that a defense is expected." Id. at 608 (citing Weaver, 570 S.W.2d at 368 -70 and Harwell, 896 S.W.2d at 172, 174 ). | 6 | 2009–2011 |
Webb v. State
green
1 sentence2014Webb v. State, 533 S.W.2d 780 , 784 n.3 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.