appellate court reviews error (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

appellate court reviews error in Washington

9 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 1971–2022 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Braden v. Reesgreen
washctapp · 1971 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 1979–1979
1 sentence

1979"If the reason given is predicated upon an issue of law, the appellate court reviews for error only, not for abuse of discretion." Braden v. Rees, 5 Wn.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
Lyster v. Metzger green
wash · 1966
2 sentences

2000Lyster v. Metzger, 68 Wash.2d 216, 226 , 412 P.2d 340 (1966).

2000Lyster v. Metzger, 68 Wash.2d 216, 226 , 412 P.2d 340 (1966).

31986–2000
Schade v. Carnegie Body Co. green
ohio · 1982
2 sentences

2022“A ‘plain error’ is obvious and prejudicial although neither objected to nor affirmatively waived which, if permitted, would have a material adverse affect on the character and public confidence in judicial proceedings.” Schade v. Carnegie Body Co., 70 Ohio St.2d 207, 209 , 436 N.E.2d 1001 (1982).

2022“A ‘plain error’ is obvious and prejudicial although neither objected to nor affirmatively waived which, if permitted, would have a material adverse affect on the character and public confidence in judicial proceedings.” Schade v. Carnegie Body Co., 70 Ohio St.2d 207, 209 , 436 N.E.2d 1001 (1982).

12022–2022
State v. Perry green
ohio · 2004
2 sentences

2022A. Plain-Error Standard Generally, “[i]f the defendant failed to raise an error affecting substantial rights at trial, an appellate court reviews the error under the plain error standard in Crim.R. 52(B).” State v. Perry, 101 Ohio St.3d 118 , 2004-Ohio-297 , 802 N.E.2d 643, ¶ 14 .

2022A. Plain-Error Standard Generally, “[i]f the defendant failed to raise an error affecting substantial rights at trial, an appellate court reviews the error under the plain error standard in Crim.R. 52(B).” State v. Perry, 101 Ohio St.3d 118 , 2004-Ohio-297 , 802 N.E.2d 643, ¶ 14 .

12022–2022
Morris v. PALOUSE RIVER & COULEE CITY RR neutral
washctapp · 2009
1 sentence

2018App. 366, 370-71 , 203 P.3d 1069 (2009). -3- No. 76646-5-1/ 4 judgment.2 But a trial court has a nondiscretionary duty to vacate a void judgment.3 An appellate court reviews a claim that a judgment is void de novo.4 First, Option One contends that !aches bars Hovander's defense because of her substantial delay in filing the motion to vacate.

12018–2018
State v. Green green
wash · 1980
2 sentences

2015State v. Green. 94 Wn.2d 216, 221 , 616 P.2d 628 (1980).

2015State v. Green. 94 Wn.2d 216, 221 , 616 P.2d 628 (1980).

12015–2015
State v. Little green
wash · 1991
2 sentences

1996City of Tacoma v. Luvene, 118 Wn.2d 826, 849 , 827 P.2d 1374 (1992) (citing State v. Little, 116 Wn.2d 488, 491 , 806 P.2d 749 (1991)).

1996City of Tacoma v. Luvene, 118 Wn.2d 826, 849 , 827 P.2d 1374 (1992) (citing State v. Little, 116 Wn.2d 488, 491 , 806 P.2d 749 (1991)).

11996–1996
City of Tacoma v. Luvene green
· 1992
2 sentences

1996City of Tacoma v. Luvene, 118 Wn.2d 826, 849 , 827 P.2d 1374 (1992) (citing State v. Little, 116 Wn.2d 488, 491 , 806 P.2d 749 (1991)).

1996City of Tacoma v. Luvene, 118 Wn.2d 826, 849 , 827 P.2d 1374 (1992) (citing State v. Little, 116 Wn.2d 488, 491 , 806 P.2d 749 (1991)).

11996–1996
Kientz v. Harris neutral
calctapp · 1953
1 sentence

1979App. 106, 110, 485 *256 P.2d 995 (1971).

11979–1979
Detrick v. Garretson Packing Co. green
wash · 1968
2 sentences

1971Detrick v. Garretson Packing Co., 73 Wn.2d 804 , 440 P.2d 834 (1968).

1971Detrick v. Garretson Packing Co., 73 Wn.2d 804 , 440 P.2d 834 (1968).

11971–1971

Where else courts name it

OH 118 (1988–2026) TX 26 (1985–2021) LA 17 (1999–2021) CA 10 (2013–2023) WA 9 (1971–2022) PA 7 (1976–2022) NE 5 (2004–2007) NJ 5 (2017–2026) KS 4 (2004–2026) MO 4 (1986–2012) VA 3 (2020–2025) MD 3 (2000–2010) MI 3 (2016–2016) GA 2 (2014–2021) NC 2 (2022–2022) WY 2 (2001–2005) IL 2 (2002–2002) NM 2 (2008–2009) FL 2 (2019–2019) MN 2 (2002–2005) CO 2 (2003–2017)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check