Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Pennsylvania opinions name it 1 courts 1976–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Windslowegreen1 sentence2022See Commonwealth v. Windslowe, 158 A.3d 698, 712 (Pa.Super. 2017). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Cookgreen1 sentence2020Commonwealth v. Cook, 952 A.2d 594, 626-27 (Pa. 2008). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Charlestongreen1 sentence2014When considering a challenge to the propriety of a jury instruction, an appellate court reviews the instruction in its entirety and "not simply isolated portions." Commonwealth v. Charleston, 94 A.3d 1012, 1021 (Pa. Super. 2014). | 1 | 1 |
Thompson v. City of Philadelphiagreen2 sentences2009In Bostanic v. Barker-Barto, 986 A.2d 1084, 1087 (Pa.Super.2007) (quoting Thompson v. City of Philadelphia, 507 Pa. 592 , 493 A.2d 669, 672-73 (1985)), we outlined our Supreme Court’s summary of the principles applicable when an appellate court reviews a claim that a verdict is against the weight of the evidence: This Court has repeatedly emphasized that it is not only a trial court’s inherent fundamental and salutary power, but its duty to grant a new trial when it believes the verdict was against the weight of the evidence and resulted in a miscarriage of justice. 2009In Bostanic v. Barker-Barto, 986 A.2d 1084, 1087 (Pa.Super.2007) (quoting Thompson v. City of Philadelphia, 507 Pa. 592 , 493 A.2d 669, 672-73 (1985)), we outlined our Supreme Court’s summary of the principles applicable when an appellate court reviews a claim that a verdict is against the weight of the evidence: This Court has repeatedly emphasized that it is not only a trial court’s inherent fundamental and salutary power, but its duty to grant a new trial when it believes the verdict was against the weight of the evidence and resulted in a miscarriage of justice. | 1 | 1 |
Bostanic v. Barker-Bartogreen1 sentence2009In Bostanic v. Barker-Barto, 936 A.2d 1084, 1087 (Pa.Super.2007) (quoting Thompson v. City of Philadelphia, 507 Pa. 592 , 493 A.2d 669, 672-73 (1985)), we outlined our Supreme Court's summary of the principles applicable when an appellate court reviews a claim that a verdict is against the weight of the evidence: This Court has repeatedly emphasized that it is not only a trial court's inherent fundamental and salutary power, but its duty to grant a new trial when it believes the verdict was against the weight of the evidence and resulted in a miscarriage of justice. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Levey v. DeNardo
green
2 sentences2004Levey v. DeNardo, 555 Pa. 514 , 725 A.2d 733 (1999). 2004Levey v. DeNardo, 555 Pa. 514 , 725 A.2d 733 (1999). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Krobot v. Ganzak
green
2 sentences1976Krobot v. Ganzak, 194 Pa.Super. 49 , 166 A.2d 311 (1960). 1976Krobot v. Ganzak, 194 Pa.Super. 49 , 166 A.2d 311 (1960). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Commonwealth v. Clark
green
2 sentences1976Commonwealth v. Clark, 454 Pa. 329 , 311 A.2d 910 (1973). 1976Commonwealth v. Clark, 454 Pa. 329 , 311 A.2d 910 (1973). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.