9 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Ruehlegreen2 sentences2014See United States v. Ruehle, 583 F.3d 600 , 604 n.3 (9th Cir. 2009); RPC 1.13(f) & cmt. 10. 2014See United States v. Ruehle, 583 F.3d 600 , 604 n.3 (9th Cir. 2009); RPC 1.13(f) & cmt. 10. | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Dietz v. Doe
green
2 sentences2008Dietz, 131 Wash.2d at 850 , 935 P.2d 611 . 2008Dietz, 131 Wn.2d at 850 . | 2 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Hunsaker
green
2 sentences2003Hunsaker, 74 Wn. 2003Hunsaker, 74 Wash.App. at 48 , 873 P.2d 540 . | 2 | 2003–2003 |
Missouri v. Frye
green
1 sentence2020And given that discussions between the client and defense counsel are privileged, “the prosecution has little or no notice if something may be amiss and perhaps no capacity to intervene in any event.” Missouri v. Frye, 566 U.S. at 143 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Hill
green
2 sentences2016RAP I0.3(g); State v. Hill, 123 Wn.2d 641 , 870 P.2d 313 (1994). 2016RAP I0.3(g); State v. Hill, 123 Wn.2d 641 , 870 P.2d 313 (1994). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Dietz v. Doe
green
1 sentence2008Dietz, 131 Wash.2d at 850 , 935 P.2d 611 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Chervenell
green
1 sentence1990Since disclosure of the fact that an attorney has advised a client of the privilege against self-incrimination is unlikely to indirectly disclose client communications, the privilege does not bar disclosure of such advice. 1 Chervenell, 99 Wn.2d at 316-17 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.