Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1956–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Griswoldgreen2 sentences2012AR.S. § 32-2085 (West 2012); see also State v. Sucharew, 205 Ariz. 16, 21, ¶ 10 , 66 P.3d 59, 64 (App.2003) (attorney-client privilege “belongs to the client”). 3 Put differently, the privilege is “personal to the client.” State v. Griswold, 105 Ariz. 1, 5 , 457 P.2d 331, 335 (1969). 2012AR.S. § 32-2085 (West 2012); see also State v. Sucharew, 205 Ariz. 16, 21, ¶ 10 , 66 P.3d 59, 64 (App.2003) (attorney-client privilege “belongs to the client”). 3 Put differently, the privilege is “personal to the client.” State v. Griswold, 105 Ariz. 1, 5 , 457 P.2d 331, 335 (1969). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Sucharewgreen2 sentences2012AR.S. § 32-2085 (West 2012); see also State v. Sucharew, 205 Ariz. 16, 21, ¶ 10 , 66 P.3d 59, 64 (App.2003) (attorney-client privilege “belongs to the client”). 3 Put differently, the privilege is “personal to the client.” State v. Griswold, 105 Ariz. 1, 5 , 457 P.2d 331, 335 (1969). 2012AR.S. § 32-2085 (West 2012); see also State v. Sucharew, 205 Ariz. 16, 21, ¶ 10 , 66 P.3d 59, 64 (App.2003) (attorney-client privilege “belongs to the client”). 3 Put differently, the privilege is “personal to the client.” State v. Griswold, 105 Ariz. 1, 5 , 457 P.2d 331, 335 (1969). | 1 | 1 |
In Re the Rules of Professional Conductgreen2 sentences2001Co. v. Bell, 438 Mich. 512 , 475 N.W.2d 294, 297 (1991) (“the relationship between the insurer and the retained defense counsel ... [is] less than a client-attorney relationship”); In re Rules of Professional Conduct, 299 Mont. 321 , 2 P.3d 806 , 814 ¶ 38 (2000) (“We hold that under the Rules of Professional Conduct, the insured is the sole client of defense counsel.”). 2001Co. v. Bell, 438 Mich. 512 , 475 N.W.2d 294, 297 (1991) (“the relationship between the insurer and the retained defense counsel ... [is] less than a client-attorney relationship”); In re Rules of Professional Conduct, 299 Mont. 321 , 2 P.3d 806 , 814 ¶ 38 (2000) (“We hold that under the Rules of Professional Conduct, the insured is the sole client of defense counsel.”). | 1 | 1 |
Atlanta International Insurance v. Bellgreen2 sentences2001Co. v. Bell, 438 Mich. 512 , 475 N.W.2d 294, 297 (1991) (“the relationship between the insurer and the retained defense counsel ... [is] less than a client-attorney relationship”); In re Rules of Professional Conduct, 299 Mont. 321 , 2 P.3d 806 , 814 ¶ 38 (2000) (“We hold that under the Rules of Professional Conduct, the insured is the sole client of defense counsel.”). 2001Co. v. Bell, 438 Mich. 512 , 475 N.W.2d 294, 297 (1991) (“the relationship between the insurer and the retained defense counsel ... [is] less than a client-attorney relationship”); In re Rules of Professional Conduct, 299 Mont. 321 , 2 P.3d 806 , 814 ¶ 38 (2000) (“We hold that under the Rules of Professional Conduct, the insured is the sole client of defense counsel.”). | 1 | 1 |
Matter of Wolframgreen2 sentences1995In re Wolfram, 174 Ariz. 49, 53 , 847 P.2d 94, 98 (1993). 1995In re Wolfram, 174 Ariz. 49, 53 , 847 P.2d 94, 98 (1993). | 1 | 1 |
Twohy v. State Bargreen2 sentences1990See, e.g., Twohy v. State Bar of California, 48 Cal.3d 502 , 256 Cal. Rptr. 794 , 769 P.2d 976 (1989) (attorney, a cocaine addict, twice suspended before, who failed to comply with the orders of the court and who practiced law unlawfully, is disbarred); People v. Young, 732 P.2d 1208 (Colo. 1987) (citing the ABA Standards Rule 5.11, court disbarred an attorney who engaged in the use of cocaine and was convicted of using communication facility to distribute cocaine); Matter of Payne, 494 N.E.2d 1283 (Ind. 1986) (possession of cocaine, failure to appear for a client at a hearing, and accepting c 1990See, e.g., Twohy v. State Bar of California, 48 Cal.3d 502 , 256 Cal. Rptr. 794 , 769 P.2d 976 (1989) (attorney, a cocaine addict, twice suspended before, who failed to comply with the orders of the court and who practiced law unlawfully, is disbarred); People v. Young, 732 P.2d 1208 (Colo. 1987) (citing the ABA Standards Rule 5.11, court disbarred an attorney who engaged in the use of cocaine and was convicted of using communication facility to distribute cocaine); Matter of Payne, 494 N.E.2d 1283 (Ind. 1986) (possession of cocaine, failure to appear for a client at a hearing, and accepting c | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Miles
green
1 sentence2012Id. ¶ 8 A psychologist’s client holds the privilege. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State v. Jones
green
2 sentences2003The motion was filed because the State disclosed as a potential witness a former client of defense counsel for Jones. 185 Ariz. at 482 , 917 P.2d at 211 . 2003The motion was filed because the State disclosed as a potential witness a former client of defense counsel for Jones. 185 Ariz. at 482 , 917 P.2d at 211 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. McCullough
green
1 sentence1991In Committee on Professional Ethics and Conduct v. McCullough, 468 N.W.2d 458 (Iowa 1991), the Iowa Supreme Court held that taking a contractual security interest to secure payment of attorney’s fees does not constitute entering into a business transaction with a client in violation of DR 5-104(A). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
People v. Young
green
2 sentences1990See, e.g., Twohy v. State Bar of California, 48 Cal.3d 502 , 256 Cal.Rptr. 794 , 769 P.2d 976 (1989) (attorney, a cocaine addict, twice suspended before, who failed to comply with the orders of the court and who practiced law unlawfully, is disbarred); People v. Young, 732 P.2d 1208 (Colo.1987) (citing the ABA Standards Rule 5.11, court disbarred an attorney who engaged in the use of cocaine and was convicted of using communication facility to distribute cocaine); Matter of Payne, 494 N.E.2d 1283 (Ind.1986) (possession of cocaine, failure to appear for a client at a hearing, and accepting coca 1990See, e.g., Twohy v. State Bar of California, 48 Cal.3d 502 , 256 Cal. Rptr. 794 , 769 P.2d 976 (1989) (attorney, a cocaine addict, twice suspended before, who failed to comply with the orders of the court and who practiced law unlawfully, is disbarred); People v. Young, 732 P.2d 1208 (Colo. 1987) (citing the ABA Standards Rule 5.11, court disbarred an attorney who engaged in the use of cocaine and was convicted of using communication facility to distribute cocaine); Matter of Payne, 494 N.E.2d 1283 (Ind. 1986) (possession of cocaine, failure to appear for a client at a hearing, and accepting c | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Matter of Moore
green
2 sentences1990See, e.g., Twohy v. State Bar of California, 48 Cal.3d 502 , 256 Cal.Rptr. 794 , 769 P.2d 976 (1989) (attorney, a cocaine addict, twice suspended before, who failed to comply with the orders of the court and who practiced law unlawfully, is disbarred); People v. Young, 732 P.2d 1208 (Colo.1987) (citing the ABA Standards Rule 5.11, court disbarred an attorney who engaged in the use of cocaine and was convicted of using communication facility to distribute cocaine); Matter of Payne, 494 N.E.2d 1283 (Ind.1986) (possession of cocaine, failure to appear for a client at a hearing, and accepting coca 1990See, e.g., Twohy v. State Bar of California, 48 Cal.3d 502 , 256 Cal. Rptr. 794 , 769 P.2d 976 (1989) (attorney, a cocaine addict, twice suspended before, who failed to comply with the orders of the court and who practiced law unlawfully, is disbarred); People v. Young, 732 P.2d 1208 (Colo. 1987) (citing the ABA Standards Rule 5.11, court disbarred an attorney who engaged in the use of cocaine and was convicted of using communication facility to distribute cocaine); Matter of Payne, 494 N.E.2d 1283 (Ind. 1986) (possession of cocaine, failure to appear for a client at a hearing, and accepting c | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. Shuminsky
green
2 sentences1990See, e.g., Twohy v. State Bar of California, 48 Cal.3d 502 , 256 Cal.Rptr. 794 , 769 P.2d 976 (1989) (attorney, a cocaine addict, twice suspended before, who failed to comply with the orders of the court and who practiced law unlawfully, is disbarred); People v. Young, 732 P.2d 1208 (Colo.1987) (citing the ABA Standards Rule 5.11, court disbarred an attorney who engaged in the use of cocaine and was convicted of using communication facility to distribute cocaine); Matter of Payne, 494 N.E.2d 1283 (Ind.1986) (possession of cocaine, failure to appear for a client at a hearing, and accepting coca 1990See, e.g., Twohy v. State Bar of California, 48 Cal.3d 502 , 256 Cal. Rptr. 794 , 769 P.2d 976 (1989) (attorney, a cocaine addict, twice suspended before, who failed to comply with the orders of the court and who practiced law unlawfully, is disbarred); People v. Young, 732 P.2d 1208 (Colo. 1987) (citing the ABA Standards Rule 5.11, court disbarred an attorney who engaged in the use of cocaine and was convicted of using communication facility to distribute cocaine); Matter of Payne, 494 N.E.2d 1283 (Ind. 1986) (possession of cocaine, failure to appear for a client at a hearing, and accepting c | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Matter of Payne
green
2 sentences1990See, e.g., Twohy v. State Bar of California, 48 Cal.3d 502 , 256 Cal.Rptr. 794 , 769 P.2d 976 (1989) (attorney, a cocaine addict, twice suspended before, who failed to comply with the orders of the court and who practiced law unlawfully, is disbarred); People v. Young, 732 P.2d 1208 (Colo.1987) (citing the ABA Standards Rule 5.11, court disbarred an attorney who engaged in the use of cocaine and was convicted of using communication facility to distribute cocaine); Matter of Payne, 494 N.E.2d 1283 (Ind.1986) (possession of cocaine, failure to appear for a client at a hearing, and accepting coca 1990See, e.g., Twohy v. State Bar of California, 48 Cal.3d 502 , 256 Cal. Rptr. 794 , 769 P.2d 976 (1989) (attorney, a cocaine addict, twice suspended before, who failed to comply with the orders of the court and who practiced law unlawfully, is disbarred); People v. Young, 732 P.2d 1208 (Colo. 1987) (citing the ABA Standards Rule 5.11, court disbarred an attorney who engaged in the use of cocaine and was convicted of using communication facility to distribute cocaine); Matter of Payne, 494 N.E.2d 1283 (Ind. 1986) (possession of cocaine, failure to appear for a client at a hearing, and accepting c | 1 | 1990–1990 |
In the Matter of Bosserman
green
2 sentences1990See, e.g., Twohy v. State Bar of California, 48 Cal.3d 502 , 256 Cal. Rptr. 794 , 769 P.2d 976 (1989) (attorney, a cocaine addict, twice suspended before, who failed to comply with the orders of the court and who practiced law unlawfully, is disbarred); People v. Young, 732 P.2d 1208 (Colo. 1987) (citing the ABA Standards Rule 5.11, court disbarred an attorney who engaged in the use of cocaine and was convicted of using communication facility to distribute cocaine); Matter of Payne, 494 N.E.2d 1283 (Ind. 1986) (possession of cocaine, failure to appear for a client at a hearing, and accepting c 1990See, e.g., Twohy v. State Bar of California, 48 Cal.3d 502 , 256 Cal. Rptr. 794 , 769 P.2d 976 (1989) (attorney, a cocaine addict, twice suspended before, who failed to comply with the orders of the court and who practiced law unlawfully, is disbarred); People v. Young, 732 P.2d 1208 (Colo. 1987) (citing the ABA Standards Rule 5.11, court disbarred an attorney who engaged in the use of cocaine and was convicted of using communication facility to distribute cocaine); Matter of Payne, 494 N.E.2d 1283 (Ind. 1986) (possession of cocaine, failure to appear for a client at a hearing, and accepting c | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. Orosz
green
2 sentences1990See, e.g., Twohy v. State Bar of California, 48 Cal.3d 502 , 256 Cal. Rptr. 794 , 769 P.2d 976 (1989) (attorney, a cocaine addict, twice suspended before, who failed to comply with the orders of the court and who practiced law unlawfully, is disbarred); People v. Young, 732 P.2d 1208 (Colo. 1987) (citing the ABA Standards Rule 5.11, court disbarred an attorney who engaged in the use of cocaine and was convicted of using communication facility to distribute cocaine); Matter of Payne, 494 N.E.2d 1283 (Ind. 1986) (possession of cocaine, failure to appear for a client at a hearing, and accepting c 1990See, e.g., Twohy v. State Bar of California, 48 Cal.3d 502 , 256 Cal. Rptr. 794 , 769 P.2d 976 (1989) (attorney, a cocaine addict, twice suspended before, who failed to comply with the orders of the court and who practiced law unlawfully, is disbarred); People v. Young, 732 P.2d 1208 (Colo. 1987) (citing the ABA Standards Rule 5.11, court disbarred an attorney who engaged in the use of cocaine and was convicted of using communication facility to distribute cocaine); Matter of Payne, 494 N.E.2d 1283 (Ind. 1986) (possession of cocaine, failure to appear for a client at a hearing, and accepting c | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Tidwell v. Riggs
green
2 sentences1956In Tidwell v. Riggs, 70 Ariz. 417 , 222 P. 2d 795 , Justice Udall, in writing the opinion for the court set out haec verba the assignments of error therein presented (very similar to the assignments in the instant case)' and the provisions of Rule 10 and painstakingly informed the Bar what would be the result of failure to comply with the rule. 1956In Tidwell v. Riggs, 70 Ariz. 417 , 222 P. 2d 795 , Justice Udall, in writing the opinion for the court set out haec verba the assignments of error therein presented (very similar to the assignments in the instant case)' and the provisions of Rule 10 and painstakingly informed the Bar what would be the result of failure to comply with the rule. | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.