Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1973–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Browngreen1 sentence2019Cf. Brown, 159 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Sneddengreen1 sentence2014Snedden, 149 Wn.2d at 919 (the plain language of the indecent exposure statute satisfies the “crime against a person” requirement); Stinton, 121 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Stintongreen1 sentence2014Snedden, 149 Wn.2d at 919 (the plain language of the indecent exposure statute satisfies the “crime against a person” requirement); Stinton, 121 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Tingey v. Haisch
green
2 sentences2009Tingey, 159 Wash.2d at 664 , 152 P.3d 1020 . 2009Tingey, 159 Wn.2d at 664 . | 2 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Maddox
green
2 sentences2009Maddox, 152 Wn.2d at 506 . ¶13 The staleness doctrine applies to search warrant cases, as evidenced by the cases Bishop cites. 6 Nonetheless, even applying search warrant doctrine to the arrest warrant here, the information supporting his arrest was not stale. 2009Maddox, 152 Wash.2d at 506 , 98 P.3d 1199 . ¶ 13 The staleness doctrine applies to search warrant cases, as evidenced by the cases Bishop cites. [6] Nonetheless, even applying search warrant doctrine to the arrest warrant here, the information supporting his arrest was not stale. | 2 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Neth
green
2 sentences2021Neth, 165 Wn.2d at 182 . 2021Neth, 165 Wn.2d at 182 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Maddox
green
1 sentence2009Maddox, 152 Wash.2d at 506 , 98 P.3d 1199 . ¶ 13 The staleness doctrine applies to search warrant cases, as evidenced by the cases Bishop cites. [6] Nonetheless, even applying search warrant doctrine to the arrest warrant here, the information supporting his arrest was not stale. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Tingey v. Haisch
green
1 sentence2009Tingey, 159 Wash.2d at 664 , 152 P.3d 1020 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Anderson
green
1 sentence1991State v. Petty, supra; State v. Anderson, 41 Wn. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Kois v. Wisconsin
green
2 sentences1973Ed. 2d 312 , 92 S. Ct. 2245 (1972), has devised a commonsense test which generally provides that if pictures accompany text material, itself not considered obscene under the Roth test, the accompanying pictures which would otherwise violate Roth will be protected by the First Amendment (1) if they are relevant to the theme of the article, (2) have a reasonable and rational relationship to the text, and (3) the text is not a mere vehicle for publication of the pictures. 1973Kois v. Wisconsin, 408 U.S. 229 , 33 L.Ed.2d 312 , 92 S.Ct. 2245 (1972), has devised a commonsense test which generally provides that if pictures accompany text material, itself not considered obscene under the Roth test, the accompanying pictures which would otherwise violate Roth will be protected by the First Amendment (1) if they are relevant to the theme of the article, (2) have a reasonable and rational relationship to the text, and (3) the text is not a mere vehicle for publication of the pictures. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Miller v. California
green
2 sentences1973The court in Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 26 , 37 L. 1973The court in Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 26 , 37 L. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.