Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1962–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Jonesgreen2 sentences2003See, e.g., State v. Jones, 146 Wash.2d 328 , 45 P.3d 1062 (2002); State v. Williams, 142 Wash.2d 17 , 11 P.3d 714 (2000); State v. Carter, 127 Wash.2d 836 , 904 P.2d 290 (1995). 2003See, e.g., State v. Jones, 146 Wn.2d 328 , 45 P.3d 1062 (2002); State v. Williams, 142 Wn.2d 17 , 11 P.3d 714 (2000); State v. Carter, 127 Wn.2d 836 , 904 P.2d 290 (1995). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Jonesgreen2 sentences2003See, e.g., State v. Jones, 146 Wash.2d 328 , 45 P.3d 1062 (2002); State v. Williams, 142 Wash.2d 17 , 11 P.3d 714 (2000); State v. Carter, 127 Wash.2d 836 , 904 P.2d 290 (1995). 2003See, e.g., State v. Jones, 146 Wn.2d 328 , 45 P.3d 1062 (2002); State v. Williams, 142 Wn.2d 17 , 11 P.3d 714 (2000); State v. Carter, 127 Wn.2d 836 , 904 P.2d 290 (1995). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Gunwallgreen2 sentences2003See State v. Gunwall, 106 Wash.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986). [10] This holding does not affect the validity of the limited pat down search exception permissible under Terry, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 . [11] We leave for another case the question whether the rule might apply in another context under article I, section 7, a question we have not decided. [1] In some instances the first step will be to determine whether the defendant has standing to challenge the law enforcement action. 2003See State v. Gunwall, 106 Wash.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986). [10] This holding does not affect the validity of the limited pat down search exception permissible under Terry, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 . [11] We leave for another case the question whether the rule might apply in another context under article I, section 7, a question we have not decided. [1] In some instances the first step will be to determine whether the defendant has standing to challenge the law enforcement action. | 1 | 1 |
Terry v. Ohiogreen2 sentences2003See State v. Gunwall, 106 Wash.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986). [10] This holding does not affect the validity of the limited pat down search exception permissible under Terry, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 . [11] We leave for another case the question whether the rule might apply in another context under article I, section 7, a question we have not decided. [1] In some instances the first step will be to determine whether the defendant has standing to challenge the law enforcement action. 2003See State v. Gunwall, 106 Wash.2d 54 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986). [10] This holding does not affect the validity of the limited pat down search exception permissible under Terry, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 . [11] We leave for another case the question whether the rule might apply in another context under article I, section 7, a question we have not decided. [1] In some instances the first step will be to determine whether the defendant has standing to challenge the law enforcement action. | 1 | 1 |
Coates v. City of Cincinnatigreen2 sentences1983See Coates v. Cincinnati, 402 U.S. 611 , 29 L. 1983See Coates v. Cincinnati, 402 U.S. 611 , 29 L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Williams
green
2 sentences2003See, e.g., State v. Jones, 146 Wash.2d 328 , 45 P.3d 1062 (2002); State v. Williams, 142 Wash.2d 17 , 11 P.3d 714 (2000); State v. Carter, 127 Wash.2d 836 , 904 P.2d 290 (1995). 2003See, e.g., State v. Jones, 146 Wn.2d 328 , 45 P.3d 1062 (2002); State v. Williams, 142 Wn.2d 17 , 11 P.3d 714 (2000); State v. Carter, 127 Wn.2d 836 , 904 P.2d 290 (1995). | 4 | 2002–2003 |
State v. Williams
green
2 sentences2003See, e.g., State v. Jones, 146 Wash.2d 328 , 45 P.3d 1062 (2002); State v. Williams, 142 Wash.2d 17 , 11 P.3d 714 (2000); State v. Carter, 127 Wash.2d 836 , 904 P.2d 290 (1995). 2003See, e.g., State v. Jones, 146 Wn.2d 328 , 45 P.3d 1062 (2002); State v. Williams, 142 Wn.2d 17 , 11 P.3d 714 (2000); State v. Carter, 127 Wn.2d 836 , 904 P.2d 290 (1995). | 4 | 2002–2003 |
State v. Carter
green
2 sentences2003See, e.g., State v. Jones, 146 Wash.2d 328 , 45 P.3d 1062 (2002); State v. Williams, 142 Wash.2d 17 , 11 P.3d 714 (2000); State v. Carter, 127 Wash.2d 836 , 904 P.2d 290 (1995). 2003See, e.g., State v. Jones, 146 Wn.2d 328 , 45 P.3d 1062 (2002); State v. Williams, 142 Wn.2d 17 , 11 P.3d 714 (2000); State v. Carter, 127 Wn.2d 836 , 904 P.2d 290 (1995). | 2 | 2003–2003 |
State v. Carter
green
2 sentences2003See, e.g., State v. Jones, 146 Wash.2d 328 , 45 P.3d 1062 (2002); State v. Williams, 142 Wash.2d 17 , 11 P.3d 714 (2000); State v. Carter, 127 Wash.2d 836 , 904 P.2d 290 (1995). 2003See, e.g., State v. Jones, 146 Wn.2d 328 , 45 P.3d 1062 (2002); State v. Williams, 142 Wn.2d 17 , 11 P.3d 714 (2000); State v. Carter, 127 Wn.2d 836 , 904 P.2d 290 (1995). | 2 | 2003–2003 |
State v. White
neutral
1 sentence2016App. 227, 230 , 152 P.3d 364 (2007). "[R]esolution of a motion to suppress requires a two-part inquiry: (1) whether a defendant has standing to challenge the police conduct; and (2) whether the police conduct is contrary to the constitutional protections and guarantees." 12 ROYCE A. FERGUSON, JR., WASHINGTON PRACTICE: CRIMINAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE§ 2402, at 533 (3d ed. 2004). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Bahl
green
1 sentence2013State v. Bahl, 164 Wn. 2d 739, 744 , 193 P. 3d 678 ( 2008); State v. Riles, 86 Wn. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Riles
green
1 sentence2013State v. Bahl, 164 Wn. 2d 739, 744 , 193 P. 3d 678 ( 2008); State v. Riles, 86 Wn. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Bahl
green
1 sentence2013State v. Bahl, 164 Wn. 2d 739, 744 , 193 P. 3d 678 ( 2008); State v. Riles, 86 Wn. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Michaels
green
2 sentences2001A. Automatic Standing 13 Although the United States Supreme Court has abandoned the automatic standing rule, its status remains unclear in the State of Washington. 14 Under the automatic standing rule, “a defendant has standing to claim the constitutional protection from unreasonable searches and seizures if he was legitimately on premises where a search occurred and if the fruits of the search are proposed to be used against him.” State v. Michaels, 60 Wn.2d 638, 646 , 374 P.2d 989 (1962). 2001A. Automatic Standing 13 Although the United States Supreme Court has abandoned the automatic standing rule, its status remains unclear in the State of Washington. 14 Under the automatic standing rule, “a defendant has standing to claim the constitutional protection from unreasonable searches and seizures if he was legitimately on premises where a search occurred and if the fruits of the search are proposed to be used against him.” State v. Michaels, 60 Wn.2d 638, 646 , 374 P.2d 989 (1962). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Zuanich
green
2 sentences1983See Coates v. Cincinnati, 402 U.S. 611 , 29 L.Ed.2d 214 , 91 S.Ct. 1686 (1971); Void-for-Vagueness — Judicial Response to Allegedly Vague Statutes — State v. Zuanich, 92 Wn.2d 61 , 593 P.2d 1314 (1979), 56 Wash. L. 1983See Coates v. Cincinnati, 402 U.S. 611 , 29 L.Ed.2d 214 , 91 S.Ct. 1686 (1971); Void-for-Vagueness — Judicial Response to Allegedly Vague Statutes — State v. Zuanich, 92 Wn.2d 61 , 593 P.2d 1314 (1979), 56 Wash. L. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Jones v. United States
red
2 sentences1962The United States Supreme Court, in a recent decision, Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257 , 4 L.Ed. (2d) 697, 80 S.Ct. 725 , 78 A.L.R. (2d) 233, has held that a defendant has standing to claim the constitutional protection from unreasonable searches and seizures if he was legitimately on premises where a search occurred and if the fruits of the search are proposed to be used against him. 1962The United States Supreme Court, in a recent decision, Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257 , 4 L.Ed. (2d) 697, 80 S.Ct. 725 , 78 A.L.R. (2d) 233, has held that a defendant has standing to claim the constitutional protection from unreasonable searches and seizures if he was legitimately on premises where a search occurred and if the fruits of the search are proposed to be used against him. | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.