Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2014–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Thanggreen2 sentences2016Ct. Thang, 145 Wn.2d at 642 (in assessing whether a trial court abuses its 12 State v. Ashley Jr. (Baron) No. 91771-0 discretion, we also consider whether a reasonable judge would rule as the trial court did). 2016Cf. Thang, 145 Wn.2d at 642 (in assessing whether a trial court abuses its discretion, we also consider whether a reasonable judge would rule as the trial court did). | 2 | 5 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Gunderson
green
2 sentences2024Id. 2024Id. | 4 | 2015–2024 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.