co-conspirator exception (Alaska) · Go Syfert
← Alaska issues

co-conspirator exception in Alaska

8 Alaska opinions name it 2 courts 1977–1992 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (9)

CaseFollowedCited
United States v. Wilmer Stanley Snowgreen
ca9 · 1975 · cited in 2 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1983–1988
2 sentences

1983For example, in United States v. Snow, 521 F.2d 730, 734-35 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1090 , 96 S.Ct. 883 , 47 L.Ed.2d 101 (1976), the court dealt with the analogous issue of whether the confrontation clause was violated by admission against the defendant, under the co-conspirator exception to the hearsay rule, of prior statements made by an accomplice.

1983For example, in United States v. Snow, 521 F.2d 730, 734-35 (9th Cir.1975), ce rt. denied, 423 U.S. 1090 , 96 S.Ct. 883 , 47 L.Ed.2d 101 (1976), the court dealt with the analogous issue of whether the confrontation clause was violated by admission against the defendant, under the co-conspirator exception to the hearsay rule, of prior statements made by an accomplice.

22
Amidon v. Stategreen
alaska · 1977 · cited in 2 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1981–1981
2 sentences

1981In Amidon v. State, 565 P.2d 1248 (Alaska 1977), we adopted and set out the requirements for the Alaska version of the co-conspirator exception to the hearsay rule.

1981Because the substantive crime of conspiracy does not exist in Alaska, the only proper function of a conspiracy instruction is evidentiary in nature, relating to the co-conspirator exception to the hearsay rule recognized in Amidon v. State, 565 P.2d 1248, 1258 (Alaska 1977).

12
Hawley v. Stategreen
alaska · 1980 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
1 sentence

1992In Hawley v. State, 614 P.2d 1349, 1358-59 (Alaska 1980), the Alaska Supreme Court held that co-conspirator statements must be accompanied by “indicia of reliability" to satisfy the confrontation clause of the Sixth Amendment.

11
Crump v. Stategreen
alaska · 1981 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1988–1988
2 sentences

1988Williamson v. State, 692 P.2d 965, 969 (Alaska App.1984); Crump v. State, 625 P.2d 857, 862-68 (Alaska 1981). (a) With respect to Arnold’s statement to Sherry Schroeder that Stumpf owed him money, Stumpf relies on United States v. Fielding, 645 F.2d 719 (9th Cir.1981).

1988Williamson v. State, 692 P.2d 965, 969 (Alaska App. 1984); Crump v. State, 625 P.2d 857, 862-63 (Alaska 1981). (a) With respect to Arnold's statement to Sherry Schroeder that Stumpf owed him money, Stumpf relies on United States v. Fielding, 645 F.2d 719 (9th Cir.1981).

11
Williamson v. Stategreen
alaskactapp · 1984 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1988–1988
2 sentences

1988Williamson v. State, 692 P.2d 965, 969 (Alaska App.1984); Crump v. State, 625 P.2d 857, 862-68 (Alaska 1981). (a) With respect to Arnold’s statement to Sherry Schroeder that Stumpf owed him money, Stumpf relies on United States v. Fielding, 645 F.2d 719 (9th Cir.1981).

1988Williamson v. State, 692 P.2d 965, 969 (Alaska App. 1984); Crump v. State, 625 P.2d 857, 862-63 (Alaska 1981). (a) With respect to Arnold's statement to Sherry Schroeder that Stumpf owed him money, Stumpf relies on United States v. Fielding, 645 F.2d 719 (9th Cir.1981).

11
United States v. Joseph F. Radekergreen
ca10 · 1981 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1988–1988
1 sentence

1988See United States v. Radeker, 664 F.2d 242 (10th Cir.1981).

11
Dutton v. Evansgreen
scotus · 1970 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1983–1983
2 sentences

1983The court relied on the United States Supreme Court’s plurality opinion Dutton v. Evans, 400 U.S. 74, 88-89 , 91 S.Ct. 210, 219-220 , 27 L.Ed.2d 213, 226-27 (1970), to indicate four factors relevant to the issue of reliability: The Dutton plurality opinion sets forth a number of factors which were indicative of reliability in that case: (1) the declaration contained no assertion of a past fact, and consequently carried a warning to the jury against giving it undue weight; (2) the de-clarant had personal knowledge of the identity and role of participants in the crime; (3) the possibility that t

1983The court relied on the United States Supreme Court’s plurality opinion Dutton v. Evans, 400 U.S. 74, 88-89 , 91 S.Ct. 210, 219-220 , 27 L.Ed.2d 213, 226-27 (1970), to indicate four factors relevant to the issue of reliability: The Dutton plurality opinion sets forth a number of factors which were indicative of reliability in that case: (1) the declaration contained no assertion of a past fact, and consequently carried a warning to the jury against giving it undue weight; (2) the de-clarant had personal knowledge of the identity and role of participants in the crime; (3) the possibility that t

11
Martin Nelson Kay v. United Statesgreen
ca9 · 1970 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1981–1981
2 sentences

1981Relying on Kay v. United States, 421 F.2d 1007, 1010 (9th Cir.1970), we found the exception applicable to a joint trial even in the absence of a conspiracy count.

1981Relying on Kay v. United States, 421 F.2d 1007, 1010 (9th Cir. 1970), we found the exception applicable to a joint trial even in the absence of a conspiracy count.

11
United States v. Baxtergreen
ca9 · 1973 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1977–1977
2 sentences

1977United States v. Baxter, 492 F.2d 150, 177 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 940 , 94 S.Ct. 1945 , 40 L.Ed.2d 292 (1974).

1977United States v. Baxter, 492 F.2d 150, 177 (9th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 940 , 94 S.Ct. 1945 , 40 L.Ed.2d 292 (1974).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
Bourjaily v. United States red
scotus · 1987
2 sentences

1988Bourjaily v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 107 S.Ct. 2775, 2782-83 , 97 L.Ed.2d 144 (1987).

1988Bourjaily v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 107 S.Ct. 2775, 2782-83 , 97 L.Ed.2d 144 (1987).

11988–1988
Krulewitch v. United States green
scotus · 1949
2 sentences

1988Krulewitch v. United States, 336 U.S. 440, 442-45 , 69 S.Ct. 716, 717-19 , 93 L.Ed. 790 (1949).

1988Krulewitch v. United States, 336 U.S. 440, 442-45 , 69 S.Ct. 716, 717-19 , 93 L.Ed. 790 (1949).

11988–1988
United States v. Carl Fielding green
ca9 · 1981
2 sentences

1988Williamson v. State, 692 P.2d 965, 969 (Alaska App.1984); Crump v. State, 625 P.2d 857, 862-68 (Alaska 1981). (a) With respect to Arnold’s statement to Sherry Schroeder that Stumpf owed him money, Stumpf relies on United States v. Fielding, 645 F.2d 719 (9th Cir.1981).

1988Williamson v. State, 692 P.2d 965, 969 (Alaska App. 1984); Crump v. State, 625 P.2d 857, 862-63 (Alaska 1981). (a) With respect to Arnold's statement to Sherry Schroeder that Stumpf owed him money, Stumpf relies on United States v. Fielding, 645 F.2d 719 (9th Cir.1981).

11988–1988
United States v. Santos Dejesus and Louis Rupert Garcia green
ca2 · 1986
1 sentence

1988No such bootstrapping is involved, however, where a co-conspirator’s hearsay statement is admissible against a defendant under an exception to the hearsay rule other than the co-conspirator exception. 806 F.2d at 35 .

11988–1988
Hines v. Bombard green
scotus · 1976
1 sentence

1983For example, in United States v. Snow, 521 F.2d 730, 734-35 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1090 , 96 S.Ct. 883 , 47 L.Ed.2d 101 (1976), the court dealt with the analogous issue of whether the confrontation clause was violated by admission against the defendant, under the co-conspirator exception to the hearsay rule, of prior statements made by an accomplice.

11983–1983
Snow v. United States green
scotus · 1976
2 sentences

1983For example, in United States v. Snow, 521 F.2d 730, 734-35 (9th Cir.1975), ce rt. denied, 423 U.S. 1090 , 96 S.Ct. 883 , 47 L.Ed.2d 101 (1976), the court dealt with the analogous issue of whether the confrontation clause was violated by admission against the defendant, under the co-conspirator exception to the hearsay rule, of prior statements made by an accomplice.

1983For example, in United States v. Snow, 521 F.2d 730, 734-35 (9th Cir.1975), ce rt. denied, 423 U.S. 1090 , 96 S.Ct. 883 , 47 L.Ed.2d 101 (1976), the court dealt with the analogous issue of whether the confrontation clause was violated by admission against the defendant, under the co-conspirator exception to the hearsay rule, of prior statements made by an accomplice.

11983–1983
Baxter v. United States green
scotus · 1974
2 sentences

1977United States v. Baxter, 492 F.2d 150, 177 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 940 , 94 S.Ct. 1945 , 40 L.Ed.2d 292 (1974).

1977United States v. Baxter, 492 F.2d 150, 177 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 940 , 94 S.Ct. 1945 , 40 L.Ed.2d 292 (1974).

11977–1977

Where else courts name it

PA 62 (1972–2025) TX 41 (1978–2026) GA 41 (1979–2026) IL 35 (1977–2020) MO 21 (1977–2024) NJ 17 (1989–2024) TN 14 (1981–2025) NC 11 (1980–2022) OH 11 (1980–2023) MD 8 (1981–2012) AK 8 (1977–1992) VA 6 (1983–2021) CO 6 (1977–1998) FL 5 (1976–2001) ID 5 (1994–2008) IN 4 (1988–1999) DC 4 (1986–2009) CA 4 (2002–2022) NY 4 (1991–2012) IA 3 (1976–2024) HI 3 (1981–1999) AZ 3 (1975–2018) KY 3 (2006–2025) WI 3 (1981–2007) SC 3 (1997–2008) MN 3 (1990–2012) MI 2 (1976–2006) NH 2 (1981–1991) WY 2 (1977–1987) OK 2 (1984–2004) AL 2 (1994–1996) KS 2 (1978–1995) OR 2 (1982–1982) SD 2 (1984–1988) NV 2 (1992–1996) LA 2 (1987–2023) NM 2 (1981–1996)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check