appellant contends error (Alabama) · Go Syfert
← Alabama issues

appellant contends error in Alabama

8 Alabama opinions name it 1 courts 1978–1995 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
Cage v. Louisiana green
scotus · 1990
2 sentences

1991Specifically, the appellant contends that the instruction violated the Supreme Court’s holding in Cage v. Louisiana, 498 U.S. 39 , 111 S.Ct. 328 , 112 L.Ed.2d 339 (1990).

1991Specifically, the appellant contends that the instruction violated the Supreme Court’s holding in Cage v. Louisiana, 498 U.S. 39 , 111 S.Ct. 328 , 112 L.Ed.2d 339 (1990).

31991–1991
Byrd v. State neutral
· 1973
2 sentences

1995In Byrd v. State , 51 Ala. App. 234 , 237-38 , 283 So.2d 683 (1973), this court addressed a similar situation.

1995In Byrd v. State , 51 Ala. App. 234 , 237-38 , 283 So.2d 683 (1973), this court addressed a similar situation.

11995–1995
Miranda v. Arizona green
scotus · 1966
2 sentences

1993The appellant contends that error occurred when statements made by him were admitted into evidence without proof of compliance with Miranda v. Arizona , 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), and without proof that the statements were voluntary.

1993The appellant contends that error occurred when statements made by him were admitted into evidence without proof of compliance with Miranda v. Arizona , 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), and without proof that the statements were voluntary.

11993–1993
Myrick v. State neutral
alacrimapp · 1987
1 sentence

1987"The credibility of a witness may be impeached by proof of his intoxication but only if such intoxication occurs either at the time the witness takes the stand to testify or at the time he observed the facts to which he is testifying." Myrick v. State , 508 So.2d 1215 (Ala.Crim.App. 1987) (quoting C.

11987–1987
Howard L. Dickerson v. State of Alabama green
ca11 · 1982
2 sentences

1985The trial judge denied this request, and the appellant contends this was error citing Dickerson v. State of Alabama , 667 F.2d 1364 (11th Cir. 1982).

1985In Dickerson , supra, at 1369-70 , the court stated the following: "III.

11985–1985
Elrod v. State green
ala · 1967
2 sentences

1978"The issue raised by the appellant has previously been answered by the Alabama Supreme Court in Elrod v. State , 281 Ala. 331 , 202 So.2d 539 (1967).

1978"The issue raised by the appellant has previously been answered by the Alabama Supreme Court in Elrod v. State , 281 Ala. 331 , 202 So.2d 539 (1967).

11978–1978

Where else courts name it

NY 14 (1888–2016) TX 11 (1914–2007) KS 10 (1913–1977) CA 9 (1919–1961) AL 8 (1978–1995) MD 6 (1949–1976) MO 5 (1959–1979) LA 5 (1961–1993) IN 5 (1952–1970) KY 4 (1944–1992) FL 4 (1968–1982) TN 4 (1986–2000) PA 3 (1930–1990) IA 3 (1914–1938) OH 3 (1984–2000) NE 3 (1916–1989) MS 2 (1955–1986) WA 2 (1914–1920) WV 2 (1962–1981) AZ 2 (1925–1974) GA 2 (1974–1981) AR 2 (1933–1993) ID 2 (1974–1976) OK 2 (1982–1985)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check