Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Alabama opinions name it 3 courts 1984–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kaercher v. Stategreen2 sentences2013Cochran v. State, 500 So.2d 1161 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), rev’d in part on other grounds, 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala.1985), on remand, 500 So.2d 1188 (Ala.Cr.App.1986), aff'd, 500 So.2d 1064 (Ala.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1088 , 107 S.Ct. 1965 , 95 L.Ed.2d 537 (1987).... ‘A person who is aggrieved by an illegal search and seizure only through the introduction of damaging evidence secured by a search of a third person’s premises or property has not had any of his Fourth Amendment rights infringed.’ Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 134 , 99 S.Ct. 421, 425 , 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978). ‘For a search to violate 2006Cochran v. State , 500 So.2d 1161 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984), rev'd in part on other grounds , 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala. 1985), on remand , 500 So.2d 1188 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986), aff'd , 500 So.2d 1064 (Ala. 1986), cert. denied , 481 U.S. 1033 , 107 S.Ct. 1965 , 95 L.Ed.2d 537 (1987). . . . `A person who is aggrieved by an illegal search and seizure only through the introduction of damaging evidence secured by a search of a third person's premises or property has not had any of his Fourth Amendment rights infringed.' Rakas v. Illinois , 439 U.S. 128 , 134 , 99 S.Ct. 421 , 425 , 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978). `For a se | 1 | 2 |
Harris v. Stategreen2 sentences2013Cochran v. State, 500 So.2d 1161 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), rev’d in part on other grounds, 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala.1985), on remand, 500 So.2d 1188 (Ala.Cr.App.1986), aff'd, 500 So.2d 1064 (Ala.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1088 , 107 S.Ct. 1965 , 95 L.Ed.2d 537 (1987).... ‘A person who is aggrieved by an illegal search and seizure only through the introduction of damaging evidence secured by a search of a third person’s premises or property has not had any of his Fourth Amendment rights infringed.’ Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 134 , 99 S.Ct. 421, 425 , 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978). ‘For a search to violate 2006Cochran v. State , 500 So.2d 1161 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984), rev'd in part on other grounds , 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala. 1985), on remand , 500 So.2d 1188 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986), aff'd , 500 So.2d 1064 (Ala. 1986), cert. denied , 481 U.S. 1033 , 107 S.Ct. 1965 , 95 L.Ed.2d 537 (1987). . . . `A person who is aggrieved by an illegal search and seizure only through the introduction of damaging evidence secured by a search of a third person's premises or property has not had any of his Fourth Amendment rights infringed.' Rakas v. Illinois , 439 U.S. 128 , 134 , 99 S.Ct. 421 , 425 , 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978). `For a se | 1 | 2 |
Jones v. Stategreen1 sentence2013Cochran v. State, 500 So.2d 1161 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), rev’d in part on other grounds, 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala.1985), on remand, 500 So.2d 1188 (Ala.Cr.App.1986), aff'd, 500 So.2d 1064 (Ala.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1088 , 107 S.Ct. 1965 , 95 L.Ed.2d 537 (1987).... ‘A person who is aggrieved by an illegal search and seizure only through the introduction of damaging evidence secured by a search of a third person’s premises or property has not had any of his Fourth Amendment rights infringed.’ Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 134 , 99 S.Ct. 421, 425 , 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978). ‘For a search to violate | 1 | 1 |
State v. Jemisongreen1 sentence2013Cochran v. State, 500 So.2d 1161 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), rev’d in part on other grounds, 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala.1985), on remand, 500 So.2d 1188 (Ala.Cr.App.1986), aff'd, 500 So.2d 1064 (Ala.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1088 , 107 S.Ct. 1965 , 95 L.Ed.2d 537 (1987).... ‘A person who is aggrieved by an illegal search and seizure only through the introduction of damaging evidence secured by a search of a third person’s premises or property has not had any of his Fourth Amendment rights infringed.’ Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 134 , 99 S.Ct. 421, 425 , 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978). ‘For a search to violate | 1 | 1 |
Beard v. Stategreen1 sentence1999See also Beard v. State, 612 So.2d 1335 (Ala.Cr.App.1992) (“A defendant seeking to establish standing to challenge the introduction of evidence obtained as a result of an alleged violation of the Fourth Amendment must demonstrate that he has a legitimate expectation of privacy in the area searched.”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cochran v. State
green
2 sentences2016Cochran v. State, 500 So.2d 1161 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), rev’d in part on other grounds, 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala.1985), on remand, 500 So.2d 1188 (Ala.Cr.App.1986), aff'd, 500 So.2d 1064 (Ala.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1033 , 107 S.Ct. 1965 , 95 L.Ed.2d 537 (1987).... 2016Cochran v. State, 500 So.2d 1161 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), rev’d in part on other grounds, 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala.1985), on remand, 500 So.2d 1188 (Ala.Cr.App.1986), aff'd, 500 So.2d 1064 (Ala.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1033 , 107 S.Ct. 1965 , 95 L.Ed.2d 537 (1987).... | 6 | 1991–2016 |
Ex Parte Cochran
green
2 sentences2016Cochran v. State, 500 So.2d 1161 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), rev’d in part on other grounds, 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala.1985), on remand, 500 So.2d 1188 (Ala.Cr.App.1986), aff'd, 500 So.2d 1064 (Ala.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1033 , 107 S.Ct. 1965 , 95 L.Ed.2d 537 (1987).... 2016Cochran v. State, 500 So.2d 1161 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), rev’d in part on other grounds, 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala.1985), on remand, 500 So.2d 1188 (Ala.Cr.App.1986), aff'd, 500 So.2d 1064 (Ala.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1033 , 107 S.Ct. 1965 , 95 L.Ed.2d 537 (1987).... | 6 | 1991–2016 |
Cochran v. State
green
2 sentences2016Cochran v. State, 500 So.2d 1161 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), rev’d in part on other grounds, 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala.1985), on remand, 500 So.2d 1188 (Ala.Cr.App.1986), aff'd, 500 So.2d 1064 (Ala.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1033 , 107 S.Ct. 1965 , 95 L.Ed.2d 537 (1987).... 2016Cochran v. State, 500 So.2d 1161 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), rev’d in part on other grounds, 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala.1985), on remand, 500 So.2d 1188 (Ala.Cr.App.1986), aff'd, 500 So.2d 1064 (Ala.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1033 , 107 S.Ct. 1965 , 95 L.Ed.2d 537 (1987).... | 6 | 1991–2016 |
Ex Parte Cochran
green
2 sentences2016Cochran v. State, 500 So.2d 1161 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), rev’d in part on other grounds, 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala.1985), on remand, 500 So.2d 1188 (Ala.Cr.App.1986), aff'd, 500 So.2d 1064 (Ala.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1033 , 107 S.Ct. 1965 , 95 L.Ed.2d 537 (1987).... 2016Cochran v. State, 500 So.2d 1161 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), rev’d in part on other grounds, 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala.1985), on remand, 500 So.2d 1188 (Ala.Cr.App.1986), aff'd, 500 So.2d 1064 (Ala.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1033 , 107 S.Ct. 1965 , 95 L.Ed.2d 537 (1987).... | 6 | 1991–2016 |
Thigpen v. Pruett
green
2 sentences2016Cochran v. State, 500 So.2d 1161 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), rev’d in part on other grounds, 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala.1985), on remand, 500 So.2d 1188 (Ala.Cr.App.1986), aff'd, 500 So.2d 1064 (Ala.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1033 , 107 S.Ct. 1965 , 95 L.Ed.2d 537 (1987).... 2016Cochran v. State, 500 So.2d 1161 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), rev’d in part on other grounds, 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala.1985), on remand, 500 So.2d 1188 (Ala.Cr.App.1986), aff'd, 500 So.2d 1064 (Ala.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1033 , 107 S.Ct. 1965 , 95 L.Ed.2d 537 (1987).... | 5 | 1991–2016 |
Rakas v. Illinois
green
2 sentences1984After the cases of Rakas v. Illinois , 439 U.S. 128 , 99 S.Ct. 421 , 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978), United States v. Salvucci , 448 U.S. 83 , 100 S.Ct. 2547 , 65 L.Ed.2d 619 (1980), and Rawlings v. Kentucky , 448 U.S. 98 , 100 S.Ct. 2556 , 65 L.Ed.2d 633 (1980), a defendant wishing to establish standing to challenge the introduction of evidence obtained as a result of an alleged violation of the Fourth Amendment must demonstrate that he has a legitimate expectation of privacy in the area searched. 1984After the cases of Rakas v. Illinois , 439 U.S. 128 , 99 S.Ct. 421 , 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978), United States v. Salvucci , 448 U.S. 83 , 100 S.Ct. 2547 , 65 L.Ed.2d 619 (1980), and Rawlings v. Kentucky , 448 U.S. 98 , 100 S.Ct. 2556 , 65 L.Ed.2d 633 (1980), a defendant wishing to establish standing to challenge the introduction of evidence obtained as a result of an alleged violation of the Fourth Amendment must demonstrate that he has a legitimate expectation of privacy in the area searched. | 3 | 1984–2013 |
Ex Parte Kaercher
green
2 sentences2013Cochran v. State, 500 So.2d 1161 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), rev’d in part on other grounds, 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala.1985), on remand, 500 So.2d 1188 (Ala.Cr.App.1986), aff'd, 500 So.2d 1064 (Ala.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1088 , 107 S.Ct. 1965 , 95 L.Ed.2d 537 (1987).... ‘A person who is aggrieved by an illegal search and seizure only through the introduction of damaging evidence secured by a search of a third person’s premises or property has not had any of his Fourth Amendment rights infringed.’ Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 134 , 99 S.Ct. 421, 425 , 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978). ‘For a search to violate 2006Cochran v. State , 500 So.2d 1161 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984), rev'd in part on other grounds , 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala. 1985), on remand , 500 So.2d 1188 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986), aff'd , 500 So.2d 1064 (Ala. 1986), cert. denied , 481 U.S. 1033 , 107 S.Ct. 1965 , 95 L.Ed.2d 537 (1987). . . . `A person who is aggrieved by an illegal search and seizure only through the introduction of damaging evidence secured by a search of a third person's premises or property has not had any of his Fourth Amendment rights infringed.' Rakas v. Illinois , 439 U.S. 128 , 134 , 99 S.Ct. 421 , 425 , 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978). `For a se | 2 | 2006–2013 |
Ex Parte Collier
green
2 sentences1992Cochran v. State , 500 So.2d 1161 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala. 1985), on remand, 500 So.2d 1188 (Ala.Cr.App.), aff'd, 500 So.2d 1064 (Ala. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1033 , 107 S.Ct. 1965 , 95 L.Ed.2d 537 (1987); Collier v. State , 413 So.2d 396 (Ala.Cr.App. 1981), aff'd, 413 So.2d 403 (Ala. 1982). 1984Collier v. State , 413 So.2d 396 (Ala.Cr.App. 1981), affirmed, Ex parte Collier , 413 So.2d 403 (Ala. 1982). | 2 | 1984–1992 |
Collier v. State
green
2 sentences1992Cochran v. State , 500 So.2d 1161 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 500 So.2d 1179 (Ala. 1985), on remand, 500 So.2d 1188 (Ala.Cr.App.), aff'd, 500 So.2d 1064 (Ala. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1033 , 107 S.Ct. 1965 , 95 L.Ed.2d 537 (1987); Collier v. State , 413 So.2d 396 (Ala.Cr.App. 1981), aff'd, 413 So.2d 403 (Ala. 1982). 1984Collier v. State , 413 So.2d 396 (Ala.Cr.App. 1981), affirmed, Ex parte Collier , 413 So.2d 403 (Ala. 1982). | 2 | 1984–1992 |
Minnesota v. Olson
green
2 sentences2016A subjective expectation of privacy is legitimate if it is ‘ “one that society is prepared to recognize as ‘reasonable,’ ”’ id., at 143-144, n. 12 , quoting Katz, supra, at 361 (Harlan, J., concurring).” Minnesota v. Olson, 495 U.S. 91, 95-96 , 110 S.Ct. 1684 , 109 L.Ed.2d 85 (1990). “ ‘An appellant wishing to establish standing to challenge the introduction of evidence obtained as a result of an alleged violation of the Fourth Amendment must demonstrate that he has a legitimate expectation of privacy in the area searched. 2016A subjective expectation of privacy is legitimate if it is ‘ “one that society is prepared to recognize as ‘reasonable,’ ”’ id., at 143-144, n. 12 , quoting Katz, supra, at 361 (Harlan, J., concurring).” Minnesota v. Olson, 495 U.S. 91, 95-96 , 110 S.Ct. 1684 , 109 L.Ed.2d 85 (1990). “ ‘An appellant wishing to establish standing to challenge the introduction of evidence obtained as a result of an alleged violation of the Fourth Amendment must demonstrate that he has a legitimate expectation of privacy in the area searched. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Rawlings v. Kentucky
green
2 sentences1984After the cases of Rakas v. Illinois , 439 U.S. 128 , 99 S.Ct. 421 , 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978), United States v. Salvucci , 448 U.S. 83 , 100 S.Ct. 2547 , 65 L.Ed.2d 619 (1980), and Rawlings v. Kentucky , 448 U.S. 98 , 100 S.Ct. 2556 , 65 L.Ed.2d 633 (1980), a defendant wishing to establish standing to challenge the introduction of evidence obtained as a result of an alleged violation of the Fourth Amendment must demonstrate that he has a legitimate expectation of privacy in the area searched. 1984After the cases of Rakas v. Illinois , 439 U.S. 128 , 99 S.Ct. 421 , 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978), United States v. Salvucci , 448 U.S. 83 , 100 S.Ct. 2547 , 65 L.Ed.2d 619 (1980), and Rawlings v. Kentucky , 448 U.S. 98 , 100 S.Ct. 2556 , 65 L.Ed.2d 633 (1980), a defendant wishing to establish standing to challenge the introduction of evidence obtained as a result of an alleged violation of the Fourth Amendment must demonstrate that he has a legitimate expectation of privacy in the area searched. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
United States v. Salvucci
green
2 sentences1984After the cases of Rakas v. Illinois , 439 U.S. 128 , 99 S.Ct. 421 , 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978), United States v. Salvucci , 448 U.S. 83 , 100 S.Ct. 2547 , 65 L.Ed.2d 619 (1980), and Rawlings v. Kentucky , 448 U.S. 98 , 100 S.Ct. 2556 , 65 L.Ed.2d 633 (1980), a defendant wishing to establish standing to challenge the introduction of evidence obtained as a result of an alleged violation of the Fourth Amendment must demonstrate that he has a legitimate expectation of privacy in the area searched. 1984After the cases of Rakas v. Illinois , 439 U.S. 128 , 99 S.Ct. 421 , 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978), United States v. Salvucci , 448 U.S. 83 , 100 S.Ct. 2547 , 65 L.Ed.2d 619 (1980), and Rawlings v. Kentucky , 448 U.S. 98 , 100 S.Ct. 2556 , 65 L.Ed.2d 633 (1980), a defendant wishing to establish standing to challenge the introduction of evidence obtained as a result of an alleged violation of the Fourth Amendment must demonstrate that he has a legitimate expectation of privacy in the area searched. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.