time pertinent inquiry (Alabama) · Go Syfert
← Alabama issues

time pertinent inquiry in Alabama

8 Alabama opinions name it 1 courts 1984–2003 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
St. John v. Stategreen
alacrimapp · 1987 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993
1 sentence

1993John v. State, 523 So.2d 521, 526 (Ala.Cr.App.1987).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Elmore v. State green
alacrimapp · 1982
2 sentences

1992The appellant questions the receipt into evidence of these photographs. " 'The test for determining the admissibility of a photograph is whether it is a true and faithful representation of the *Page 1206 place or subject it purports to represent as it existed at a time pertinent to the inquiry.' Elmore v. State , 414 So.2d 175 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982)." Blankenship v. State , 589 So.2d 1321 , 1325 (Ala.Cr.App. 1991).

1991"The test for determining the admissibility of a photograph is whether it is a true and faithful representation of the place or subject it purports to represent as it existed at a time pertinent to the inquiry." Elmore v. State , 414 So.2d 175 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982).

61984–2003
Osborn v. Brown green
ala · 1978
2 sentences

2003Elmore v. State, 414 So.2d 175 (Ala.Cr.App.1982); Osborn v. Brown, 361 So.2d 82 (Ala.1978). "....

1984Elmore v. State , 414 So.2d 175 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982); Osborn v. Brown , 361 So.2d 82 (Ala. 1978).

21984–2003
Blankenship v. State green
alacrimapp · 1991
2 sentences

1992Here there is no indication of "tampering." 589 So.2d at 1325 .

1992The appellant questions the receipt into evidence of these photographs. " 'The test for determining the admissibility of a photograph is whether it is a true and faithful representation of the *Page 1206 place or subject it purports to represent as it existed at a time pertinent to the inquiry.' Elmore v. State , 414 So.2d 175 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982)." Blankenship v. State , 589 So.2d 1321 , 1325 (Ala.Cr.App. 1991).

11992–1992
Mitchell v. State green
alacrimapp · 1984
1 sentence

1987Mitchell v. State , 450 So.2d 181 , 184 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984).

11987–1987

Where else courts name it

AL 8 (1984–2003) NE 6 (1974–2023) MO 3 (1975–1995) MS 3 (1993–2018) ND 2 (1980–1984)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check