Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 California opinions name it 1 courts 2013–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. J.J.green2 sentences2026This evinces, at best, a total lack of concern for whether Andy might observe his aberrant sexual behavior.” (Andy G., at p. 1414; see also In re D.C. (2015) 243 Cal.App.4th 41, 54 [“ ‘Also relevant to the totality of the circumstances surrounding the sibling abuse is the violation of trust shown by sexually abusing one child while the other children were living in the same home and could easily have learned of or even interrupted the abuse’ ”], quoting In re I.J., supra, 56 Cal.4th at p. 778 .) Here, while Jennifer was not Father’s biological child, ample evidence in the record supports a con 2026This evinces, at best, a total lack of concern for whether Andy might observe his aberrant sexual behavior.” (Andy G., at p. 1414; see also In re D.C. (2015) 243 Cal.App.4th 41, 54 [“ ‘Also relevant to the totality of the circumstances surrounding the sibling abuse is the violation of trust shown by sexually abusing one child while the other children were living in the same home and could easily have learned of or even interrupted the abuse’ ”], quoting In re I.J., supra, 56 Cal.4th at p. 778 .) Here, while Jennifer was not Father’s biological child, ample evidence in the record supports a con | 2 | 8 |
San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. M.J.green1 sentence2026This evinces, at best, a total lack of concern for whether Andy might observe his aberrant sexual behavior.” (Andy G., at p. 1414; see also In re D.C. (2015) 243 Cal.App.4th 41, 54 [“ ‘Also relevant to the totality of the circumstances surrounding the sibling abuse is the violation of trust shown by sexually abusing one child while the other children were living in the same home and could easily have learned of or even interrupted the abuse’ ”], quoting In re I.J., supra, 56 Cal.4th at p. 778 .) Here, while Jennifer was not Father’s biological child, ample evidence in the record supports a con | 1 | 1 |
In Re Andy G.green1 sentence2022(See In re I.J., supra, 56 Cal.4th at p. 778 [“Also relevant to the totality of the circumstances surrounding the sibling abuse is the violation of trust shown by sexually abusing one child while the other children were living in the same home and could easily have learned of or even interrupted the abuse”]; In re Andy G. (2010) 183 Cal.App.4th 1405, 1412 [“ ‘We do not discount the real possibility that brothers of molested sisters can be molested [citation] or in other ways harmed by the fact of the molestation within the family. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family v. Jose C.
green
1 sentence2013Our Supreme Court has stated, “Also relevant to the totality of the circumstances surrounding the sibling abuse is the violation of trust shown by sexually abusing one child while the other children were living in the same home and could easily have learned of or even interrupted the abuse.” (In re I.J., supra, 56 Cal.4th at p. 778 ; In re Ana C., supra, 204 Cal.App.4th at p. 1332 .) C. | 1 | 2013–2013 |