8 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People in Interest of MMgreen1 sentence2014Compare People v. Schulteis, 638 P.2d 8, 10, 13 (Colo.1981), with People in the Interest of M.M., 726 P.2d at 1121 . | 1 | 1 |
Norsby v. Jensengreen1 sentence2014T 18 The purported conflict between waiver provisions implicitly underlying the court of appeals' holding stands in sharp contrast to the truly irreconcilable conflict illustrated by Norsby v. Jensen, 916 P.2d 555, 560 (Colo.App.1995). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Schultheisgreen1 sentence2014Compare People v. Schulteis, 638 P.2d 8, 10, 13 (Colo.1981), with People in the Interest of M.M., 726 P.2d at 1121 . | 1 | 1 |
North Carolina v. Alfordgreen2 sentences1982The Court went on to say, Because of the importance of protecting the innocent and of insuring that guilty pleas are a product of free and intelligent choice, various state and federal court decisions properly caution that pleas coupled with claims of innocence should not be accepted unless there is a factual basis for the plea; and until the judge taking the plea has inquired into and sought to resolve the conflict between the waiver of trial and the claim of innocence. 400 U.S. at 38, n. 10 , 91 S.Ct. at 167-68, n. 10 , 27 L.Ed.2d at 171-172, n. 10 (citations omitted). 1982The Court went on to say, Because of the importance of protecting the innocent and of insuring that guilty pleas are a product of free and intelligent choice, various state and federal court decisions properly caution that pleas coupled with claims of innocence should not be accepted unless there is a factual basis for the plea; and until the judge taking the plea has inquired into and sought to resolve the conflict between the waiver of trial and the claim of innocence. 400 U.S. at 38, n. 10 , 91 S.Ct. at 167-68, n. 10 , 27 L.Ed.2d at 171-172, n. 10 (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wc in Interest of Amk
green
2 sentences2000A.M.K., 907 P.2d 719 . 2000A.M.K., 907 P.2d 719 . | 2 | 2000–2000 |
People v. Bergerud
green
1 sentence2025At a hearing held under People v. Bergerud, 223 P.3d 686 (Colo. 2010), counsel stated, [T]here is a conflict between the defense counsel and Mr. Astacio on how to present his defense. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Security Life Insurance Co. of America v. Hannover Life Reassurance Co. of America
green
1 sentence2014Id. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Board of County Commissioners v. Bowen/Edwards Associates, Inc.
green
2 sentences2003Instead, they seek a determination concerning the validity of the rule when read against the supreme court's delicate balancing of state and local interests as reflected in Bowen/ Edwards, supra, and its enunciation of the operational conflict analysis. 2003Instead, they seek a determination concerning the validity of the rule when read against the supreme court's delicate balancing of state and local interests as reflected in Bowen/ Edwards, supra, and its enunciation of the operational conflict analysis. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.