Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1983–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Michiana Easy Livin' Country, Inc. v. Holtengreen2 sentences2006See Holten, 168 S.W.3d at 784 . 2006See Holten , 168 S.W.3d at 784 . | 2 | 2 |
Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.green2 sentences2015But also included are There is sometimes a conflict between a claim for First disqualification for unemployment compensation Amendment protection and the need for orderly (Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 , 83 S.Ct. 1790 , 10 administration of the school ststem, as we noted in L.Ed.2d 965), discharge from public employment Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 569, 88 (Slochower v. Board of Education, supra), denial of tax S.Ct. 1731, 1735, 20 L.Ed.2d 811 . 2015But also included are There is sometimes a conflict between a claim for First disqualification for unemployment compensation Amendment protection and the need for orderly (Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 , 83 S.Ct. 1790 , 10 administration of the school ststem, as we noted in L.Ed.2d 965), discharge from public employment Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 569, 88 (Slochower v. Board of Education, supra), denial of tax S.Ct. 1731, 1735, 20 L.Ed.2d 811 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Few v. Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company
green
2 sentences2000Stat. Ann. art. 1731a, § 2 (repealed and codified in Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.004(a) (Vernon 1988)). 1 In Few v. Charter Oak Fire Insurance Co., 463 S.W.2d 424 (Tex.1971), the supreme court, faced with a conflict between a rule, promulgated by the supreme court, and a statute, passed by the legislature, stated that “when a rule of the court conflicts with a legislative enactment, the rule must yield.” Id. at 425 . 2000Stat. Ann. art. 1731a, § 2 (repealed and codified in Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.004(a) (Vernon 1988)). 1 In Few v. Charter Oak Fire Insurance Co., 463 S.W.2d 424 (Tex.1971), the supreme court, faced with a conflict between a rule, promulgated by the supreme court, and a statute, passed by the legislature, stated that “when a rule of the court conflicts with a legislative enactment, the rule must yield.” Id. at 425 . | 2 | 1983–2000 |
Sherbert v. Verner
yellow
2 sentences2015But also included are There is sometimes a conflict between a claim for First disqualification for unemployment compensation Amendment protection and the need for orderly (Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 , 83 S.Ct. 1790 , 10 administration of the school ststem, as we noted in L.Ed.2d 965), discharge from public employment Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 569, 88 (Slochower v. Board of Education, supra), denial of tax S.Ct. 1731, 1735, 20 L.Ed.2d 811 . 2015But also included are There is sometimes a conflict between a claim for First disqualification for unemployment compensation Amendment protection and the need for orderly (Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 , 83 S.Ct. 1790 , 10 administration of the school ststem, as we noted in L.Ed.2d 965), discharge from public employment Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 569, 88 (Slochower v. Board of Education, supra), denial of tax S.Ct. 1731, 1735, 20 L.Ed.2d 811 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Goldberg v. Kelly
red
1 sentence2015That is one reason why exemption (Speiser v. Randall, supra), and withdrawal of summary judgments in this class of cases are seldom welfare benefits (Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 , 90 appropriate. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Olivo v. State
green
2 sentences1998In Williams v. State , No. 03-97-00707-CR (Tex. App.--Austin Dec. 18, 1997, no pet.), we wrote: As the Court of Criminal Appeals noted in Olivo , a court of appeals has jurisdiction to determine whether it has jurisdiction. 918 S.W.2d at 523 . 1998In Williams v. State , No. 03-97-00707-CR (Tex. App.--Austin Dec. 18, 1997, no pet.), we wrote: As the Court of Criminal Appeals noted in Olivo , a court of appeals has jurisdiction to determine whether it has jurisdiction. 918 S.W.2d at 523 . | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Houck v. Kroger Co.
green
1 sentence1984It is enough that the evidence at the hearing tends to sustain it.” 555 S.W.2d at 806 . | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.