conflict between instruction (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

conflict between instruction in Indiana

5 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Crabtree v. Stategreen
indctapp · 2002 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004
1 sentence

2004Id.; see also Crabtree v. State, 762 N.E.2d 217, 219-220 (Ind.Ct.App.2002) (discussing a conflict between the standard announced in Edwards and the standard announced in other appellate court cases, which require the appellate court to also consider uncontested evidence contrary to the trial court's decision).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Otte v. Tessman green
ind · 1981
1 sentence

2016The Rumfelt court noted that a specific rule controls over a general'one on the same subject matter and concluded, “Trial Rule 41(E) clearly requires a hearing on a motion to dismiss which controls over Trial Rule 73 allowing the trial court to expedite its business by directing the submission and determination of motions without oral hearing.” Id. at 983-84 .

12016–2016
Adam Morris v. State of Indiana green
indctapp · 2013
1 sentence

2014Morris, 985 N.E.2d at 367 .

12014–2014
Schuster v. State green
ind · 1912
2 sentences

1982Schuster v. State (1912), 178 Ind. [320] 323, 99 N.E. 422 .

1982Schuster v. State (1912), 178 Ind. 320 323 , 99 N.E. 422 .

11982–1982
Cottingham v. State green
ind · 1978
1 sentence

1979Due to our limited standard of review on post-conviction proceedings, Cottingham, supra, we cannot weigh the conflicting evidence and we must accept the trial judge’s determination in favor of the hearing transcript and the police officer’s testimony.

11979–1979

Where else courts name it

OH 15 (1982–2026) CA 11 (1958–2022) IL 11 (1909–1984) AZ 10 (1977–2025) CO 8 (1982–2025) TX 7 (1983–2015) AL 7 (1985–2026) UT 5 (1993–2020) LA 5 (1977–2024) IN 5 (1979–2016) MO 4 (1988–2017) IA 4 (1905–2017) ID 4 (1966–1992) GA 4 (1900–2013) NM 3 (2010–2020) MA 3 (1995–2010) NV 3 (1937–1996) CT 3 (1976–1997) KS 3 (2009–2024) FL 3 (1955–1998) MN 3 (1990–2019) MI 3 (1983–2013) TN 2 (2000–2015) PA 2 (1973–2007) DC 2 (1991–2014) NE 2 (1989–2006) MS 2 (1951–2022) NY 2 (1979–1985) OK 2 (1959–1993)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check