8 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1880–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Walz v. Tax Comm'n of City of New Yorkgreen2 sentences2016That argument is foreclosed by Walz v. Tax Comm’n , 397 U.S. 664, 669-74 (1970). 2016That argument is foreclosed by Walz v. Tax Comm’n , 397 U.S. 664, 669-74 (1970). | 2 | 2 |
Norris J. Coulter v. Michael Vitale, Individually, and as a Police Officer for the Village of Oak Parkgreen2 sentences1991Coulter v. Vitale, 882 F.2d 1286, 1289 (7th Cir.1989) (federal standard for burden of proof, not Illinois’s standard, governs § 1983 punitive damages awards; failure to object to jury instructions made it unnecessary to delineate the federal standard); Bird v. Figel, 725 F.Supp. 406, 411-12 (N.D.Ind.1989). 1991Coulter v. Vitale, 882 F.2d 1286, 1289 (7th Cir.1989) (federal standard for burden of proof, not Illinois's standard, governs § 1983 punitive damages awards; failure to object to jury instructions made it unnecessary to delineate the federal standard); Bird v. Figel, 725 F.Supp. 406, 411-12 (N.D.Ind.1989). | 1 | 1 |
Bird v. Figelgreen2 sentences1991Coulter v. Vitale, 882 F.2d 1286, 1289 (7th Cir.1989) (federal standard for burden of proof, not Illinois’s standard, governs § 1983 punitive damages awards; failure to object to jury instructions made it unnecessary to delineate the federal standard); Bird v. Figel, 725 F.Supp. 406, 411-12 (N.D.Ind.1989). 1991Coulter v. Vitale, 882 F.2d 1286, 1289 (7th Cir.1989) (federal standard for burden of proof, not Illinois's standard, governs § 1983 punitive damages awards; failure to object to jury instructions made it unnecessary to delineate the federal standard); Bird v. Figel, 725 F.Supp. 406, 411-12 (N.D.Ind.1989). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Crowley v. Crowley
neutral
2 sentences1899Walker v. Walker, supra; Andrews v. Black, 48 Ill. 256 ; Duncan v. Duncan, 23 Ill. 365 ; Crowley v. Crowley, 80 Ill. 469 ; Heirs of Critz v. Pierce, 106 Ill. 16 . 1899Walker v. Walker, supra; Andrews v. Black, 48 Ill. 256 ; Duncan v. Duncan, 23 Ill. 365 ; Crowley v. Crowley, 80 Ill. 469 ; Heirs of Critz v. Pierce, 106 Ill. 16 . | 2 | 1899–1899 |
Safari Outfitters, Inc. v. Superior Court
green
2 sentences1991In Safari Outfitters, Inc. v. Superior Court, 167 Colo. 456 , 448 P.2d 783 (Colo.1968), relied upon by the trial court, the Illinois defendant advertised in three nationally circulated magazines and, in addition, had several telephone conversations which were initiated by the Colorado plaintiff. 1991In Safari Outfitters, Inc. v. Superior Court, 167 Colo. 456 , 448 P.2d 783 (Colo.1968), relied upon by the trial court, the Illinois defendant advertised in three nationally circulated magazines and, in addition, had several telephone conversations which were initiated by the Colorado plaintiff. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Starkey v. City of Longmont
neutral
2 sentences1950Starkey v. City of Longmont, 91 Colo. 387 , 15 P. (2d) 620 . 1950Starkey v. City of Longmont, 91 Colo. 387 , 15 P. (2d) 620 . | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Illinois Central Railroad v. Hammer
neutral
2 sentences1880R. v. Hammer, 85 Ill. 526 ; Kansas is perhaps the only other State that seems to follow the Illinois doctrine. 1880R. v. Hammer, 85 Ill. 526 ; Kansas is perhaps the only other State that seems to follow the Illinois doctrine. | 1 | 1880–1880 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.