Illinois rule in Connecticut

6 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1996–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

Case	Followed	Cited
Tricontinental Industries, Limited and Tricontinental Distribution, Limited v. Pricewaterhousecoopers, LLPgreen ca7 · 2007 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019 1 sentence 2019Co. v. Lapalme , 258 F.3d 35 , 38-40 (1st Cir. 2001) (applying Massachusetts law) ; see also Tricontinental Industries, Ltd. v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP , 475 F.3d 824 , 836 (7th Cir. 2007) (applying similar Illinois rule).	1	1
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Mildred Johnson v. Lashanda Smith, Leonard Smith and Carolyn Hallgreen ca7 · 2002 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017 1 sentence 2017Co. v. Johnson , 297 F.3d 558 , 564 (7th Cir. 2002) ("[t]he Illinois doctrine of substantial compliance applies generally to life insurance policy beneficiary designations"); Green v. Jackson National Life Ins.	1	1
Randle v. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co.green ala · 1910 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001 2 sentences 2001See, e.g., Randle v. Birmingham Railway, Light Power Co ., 169 Ala. 314 , 53 So. 918 (in the context of Illinois' rule barring multiple convictions for same physical act, "act" is defined as "any overt or outward manifestation which will support a different CT Page 15941-ds offense."); People v. Meredith , 209 Mich. App. 403 , 531 N.W.2d 749 (1995) ("act" in criminal venue statute means overt act.); Bradbury v. Furlong , 13 R.I. 15 (1880); State ex rel. 2001See, e.g., Randle v. Birmingham Railway, Light Power Co ., 169 Ala. 314 , 53 So. 918 (in the context of Illinois' rule barring multiple convictions for same physical act, "act" is defined as "any overt or outward manifestation which will support a different CT Page 15941-ds offense."); People v. Meredith , 209 Mich. App. 403 , 531 N.W.2d 749 (1995) ("act" in criminal venue statute means overt act.); Bradbury v. Furlong , 13 R.I. 15 (1880); State ex rel.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (10)

Case	Cited	Years
Dini v. Naiditch green ill · 1960 2 sentences 1996Such a violation is not negligence per se and may be rebutted by proof that the party acted reasonably under the circumstances Dini v. Naiditch, 170 N.E.2d 881 (1960), Johnson v. Pendergast, 139 N.E. 407 (1923). 1996Such a violation is not negligence per se and may be rebutted by proof that the party acted reasonably under the circumstances Dini v. Naiditch, 170 N.E.2d 881 (1960), Johnson v. Pendergast, 139 N.E. 407 (1923).	2	1996–1996
Johnson v. Pendergast green ill · 1923 2 sentences 1996Such a violation is not negligence per se and may be rebutted by proof that the party acted reasonably under the circumstances Dini v. Naiditch, 170 N.E.2d 881 (1960), Johnson v. Pendergast, 139 N.E. 407 (1923). 1996Such a violation is not negligence per se and may be rebutted by proof that the party acted reasonably under the circumstances Dini v. Naiditch, 170 N.E.2d 881 (1960), Johnson v. Pendergast, 139 N.E. 407 (1923).	2	1996–1996
North American Specialty Insurance v. Lapalme green ca1 · 2001 1 sentence 2019Co. v. Lapalme , 258 F.3d 35 , 38-40 (1st Cir. 2001) (applying Massachusetts law) ; see also Tricontinental Industries, Ltd. v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP , 475 F.3d 824 , 836 (7th Cir. 2007) (applying similar Illinois rule).	1	2019–2019
Green v. Jackson National Life Ins. neutral ca6 · 2006 1 sentence 2017Co. , 195 Fed.	1	2017–2017
Doe v. Winny green illappct · 2002 2 sentences 2004App. 3d 668, 678 , 764 N.E.2d 143 (2002); id. (construing scope of Illinois immunity statute). 2004App. 3d 668, 678 , 764 N.E.2d 143 (2002); id. (construing scope of Illinois immunity statute).	1	2004–2004
People v. Meredith green michctapp · 1995 2 sentences 2001See, e.g., Randle v. Birmingham Railway, Light Power Co ., 169 Ala. 314 , 53 So. 918 (in the context of Illinois' rule barring multiple convictions for same physical act, "act" is defined as "any overt or outward manifestation which will support a different CT Page 15941-ds offense."); People v. Meredith , 209 Mich. App. 403 , 531 N.W.2d 749 (1995) ("act" in criminal venue statute means overt act.); Bradbury v. Furlong , 13 R.I. 15 (1880); State ex rel. 2001See, e.g., Randle v. Birmingham Railway, Light Power Co ., 169 Ala. 314 , 53 So. 918 (in the context of Illinois' rule barring multiple convictions for same physical act, "act" is defined as "any overt or outward manifestation which will support a different CT Page 15941-ds offense."); People v. Meredith , 209 Mich. App. 403 , 531 N.W.2d 749 (1995) ("act" in criminal venue statute means overt act.); Bradbury v. Furlong , 13 R.I. 15 (1880); State ex rel.	1	2001–2001
People v. Gladden neutral nysupct · 1983 2 sentences 2001Public Utility No. 1 of Okanogan County v. Department of Public Service , 21 Wash.2d 201 , 150 P.2d 709 (1944) ("The word `acts' . . . denotes affirmative, voluntary action or performance, as distinguished from mere omission."); contra, Black Co. v. Nova-Tech, Inc ., 333 F. Sup. 468 (D.Or. 1971); People v. Burden , 72 Cal.App.3d 603 , 140 Cal.Rptr. 282 , 289 (1977); People v. Gladden , 118 Misc.2d 831 , 462 N.Y.S.2d 115 (1983) (the failure of a parent to perform a legal duty is an-act). 2001Public Utility No. 1 of Okanogan County v. Department of Public Service , 21 Wash.2d 201 , 150 P.2d 709 (1944) ("The word `acts' . . . denotes affirmative, voluntary action or performance, as distinguished from mere omission."); contra, Black Co. v. Nova-Tech, Inc ., 333 F. Sup. 468 (D.Or. 1971); People v. Burden , 72 Cal.App.3d 603 , 140 Cal.Rptr. 282 , 289 (1977); People v. Gladden , 118 Misc.2d 831 , 462 N.Y.S.2d 115 (1983) (the failure of a parent to perform a legal duty is an-act).	1	2001–2001
People v. Burden green calctapp · 1977 2 sentences 2001Public Utility No. 1 of Okanogan County v. Department of Public Service , 21 Wash.2d 201 , 150 P.2d 709 (1944) ("The word `acts' . . . denotes affirmative, voluntary action or performance, as distinguished from mere omission."); contra, Black Co. v. Nova-Tech, Inc ., 333 F. Sup. 468 (D.Or. 1971); People v. Burden , 72 Cal.App.3d 603 , 140 Cal.Rptr. 282 , 289 (1977); People v. Gladden , 118 Misc.2d 831 , 462 N.Y.S.2d 115 (1983) (the failure of a parent to perform a legal duty is an-act). 2001Public Utility No. 1 of Okanogan County v. Department of Public Service , 21 Wash.2d 201 , 150 P.2d 709 (1944) ("The word `acts' . . . denotes affirmative, voluntary action or performance, as distinguished from mere omission."); contra, Black Co. v. Nova-Tech, Inc ., 333 F. Sup. 468 (D.Or. 1971); People v. Burden , 72 Cal.App.3d 603 , 140 Cal.Rptr. 282 , 289 (1977); People v. Gladden , 118 Misc.2d 831 , 462 N.Y.S.2d 115 (1983) (the failure of a parent to perform a legal duty is an-act).	1	2001–2001
State Ex Rel. P.U.D. v. Dept. of P.S. neutral wash · 1944 2 sentences 2001Public Utility No. 1 of Okanogan County v. Department of Public Service , 21 Wash.2d 201 , 150 P.2d 709 (1944) ("The word `acts' . . . denotes affirmative, voluntary action or performance, as distinguished from mere omission."); contra, Black Co. v. Nova-Tech, Inc ., 333 F. Sup. 468 (D.Or. 1971); People v. Burden , 72 Cal.App.3d 603 , 140 Cal.Rptr. 282 , 289 (1977); People v. Gladden , 118 Misc.2d 831 , 462 N.Y.S.2d 115 (1983) (the failure of a parent to perform a legal duty is an-act). 2001Public Utility No. 1 of Okanogan County v. Department of Public Service , 21 Wash.2d 201 , 150 P.2d 709 (1944) ("The word `acts' . . . denotes affirmative, voluntary action or performance, as distinguished from mere omission."); contra, Black Co. v. Nova-Tech, Inc ., 333 F. Sup. 468 (D.Or. 1971); People v. Burden , 72 Cal.App.3d 603 , 140 Cal.Rptr. 282 , 289 (1977); People v. Gladden , 118 Misc.2d 831 , 462 N.Y.S.2d 115 (1983) (the failure of a parent to perform a legal duty is an-act).	1	2001–2001
Bradbury v. Furlong neutral ri · 1880 1 sentence 2001See, e.g., Randle v. Birmingham Railway, Light Power Co ., 169 Ala. 314 , 53 So. 918 (in the context of Illinois' rule barring multiple convictions for same physical act, "act" is defined as "any overt or outward manifestation which will support a different CT Page 15941-ds offense."); People v. Meredith , 209 Mich. App. 403 , 531 N.W.2d 749 (1995) ("act" in criminal venue statute means overt act.); Bradbury v. Furlong , 13 R.I. 15 (1880); State ex rel.	1	2001–2001

Where else courts name it

IL 367 (1906–2026) CA 20 (1909–2021) MO 16 (1905–2025) IN 10 (1938–2012) MI 10 (1938–2021) MD 8 (1955–2026) IA 8 (1907–1992) CO 8 (1880–2016) KS 7 (1940–2020) NM 7 (1915–2008) DC 6 (1973–2022) OK 6 (1916–1994) NJ 6 (1952–2025) FL 6 (1918–2018) MT 6 (1934–1994) GA 6 (1973–2022) CT 6 (1996–2019) TX 5 (1955–2007) UT 5 (2010–2025) WI 5 (1999–2020) PA 5 (1974–2007) MN 5 (1927–1977) NC 4 (1969–2009) WV 4 (1937–2016) SD 4 (1953–2016) OR 3 (1977–2001) HI 3 (1963–1994) ID 3 (1962–1985) NY 3 (1891–1959) OH 3 (1927–1974) NE 3 (1950–1996) AZ 3 (1911–1945) VA 2 (1974–2000) ME 2 (2013–2013) MS 2 (1954–1988) WY 2 (1993–1993) VT 2 (2005–2006) KY 2 (1997–2013)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check