legal basis claim (Colorado) · Go Syfert
← Colorado issues

legal basis claim in Colorado

8 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1988–2025 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
of Wrightgreen
coloctapp · 2020 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
1 sentence

2025Moreover, “[m]ere citation to [C.A.R. 39.1] or to a statute, without more, does not satisfy the legal basis requirement.” Id.; see also In re Marriage of Evans, 2021 COA 141, ¶ 76 (enforcing this requirement); In re Marriage of Wright, 2020 COA 11, ¶¶ 39-40 (same). ¶ 33 However, I believe that mother’s appellate attorney fee request sufficiently satisfied this requirement. ¶ 34 As to the legal basis for mother’s request, mother cited the statute providing a basis for an award of attorney fees — section 14-10-119, C.R.S. 2024.

11
IN RE the MARRIAGE OF Delinda EVANS, and Kenneth Evansgreen
coloctapp · 2021 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
1 sentence

2025Moreover, “[m]ere citation to [C.A.R. 39.1] or to a statute, without more, does not satisfy the legal basis requirement.” Id.; see also In re Marriage of Evans, 2021 COA 141, ¶ 76 (enforcing this requirement); In re Marriage of Wright, 2020 COA 11, ¶¶ 39-40 (same). ¶ 33 However, I believe that mother’s appellate attorney fee request sufficiently satisfied this requirement. ¶ 34 As to the legal basis for mother’s request, mother cited the statute providing a basis for an award of attorney fees — section 14-10-119, C.R.S. 2024.

11
In Re the Marriage of Newellgreen
coloctapp · 2008 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024See C.A.R. 39.1 (a party seeking appellate attorney fees must explain the legal and factual basis for the award; “[m]ere citation to th[e] rule o r to a statute, without more, does not satisfy the legal basis requirement” ); In re Marriage of Newell , 192 P.3d 529, 538 (Colo. App. 2008). 10 V.

11
Blaser v. Camerongreen
idahoctapp · 1989 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
2 sentences

2008See, eg., Blaser v. Cameron, 116 Idaho 453 , 776 P.2d 462, 465 (App.1989)(contractor's claim was not a compulsory counterclaim in an earlier action because contractor did not have a legal basis for his claim until he had completed his promised performance under the contract); Steinberg v. St.

2008See, eg., Blaser v. Cameron, 116 Idaho 453 , 776 P.2d 462, 465 (App.1989)(contractor's claim was not a compulsory counterclaim in an earlier action because contractor did not have a legal basis for his claim until he had completed his promised performance under the contract); Steinberg v. St.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
State Board for Community Colleges & Occupational Education v. Olson green
colo · 1984
2 sentences

2003State Bd. for Cmty. Colls. & Occupational Educ. v. Olson, 687 P.2d 429 (Colo.1984).

2003State Bd. for Cmty. Colls. & Occupational Educ. v. Olson, 687 P.2d 429 (Colo.1984).

31989–2003
ge Condominium Association, Inc. v. Lo Viento Blanco, LLC green
coloctapp · 2020
1 sentence

2025Ass’n v. Lo Viento Blanco, LLC, 2020 COA 34 , ¶ 41 n.12 (“We don’t consider undeveloped and unsupported arguments.”), aff’d, 2021 CO 56 .

12025–2025
Ginter v. Palmer & Co. green
colo · 1978
2 sentences

1988Ginter v. Palmer & Co., 196 Colo. 203 , 585 P.2d 583 (1978).

1988Ginter v. Palmer & Co., 196 Colo. 203 , 585 P.2d 583 (1978).

11988–1988

Where else courts name it

CA 45 (1941–2026) TX 34 (1963–2026) FL 22 (1991–2024) TN 16 (2015–2026) IL 15 (1889–2026) OK 14 (1997–2023) UT 11 (1988–2020) MI 10 (1907–2025) CO 8 (1988–2025) MN 8 (1986–2002) NY 6 (1988–2016) NV 6 (2011–2020) MA 5 (1997–2025) MO 4 (1994–2025) NC 3 (1993–2019) PA 3 (1973–2026) WA 3 (1994–2025) OR 3 (2019–2023) MS 2 (2009–2019) WI 2 (1994–2010) AL 2 (1989–2005) ND 2 (2010–2010) CT 2 (1992–2020) LA 2 (1992–1993) NJ 2 (1959–2006) NM 2 (1971–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check