6 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 2011–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hathaway v. Stategreen2 sentences2020See Hathaway v. State, 119 Nev. 248, 252 , 71 P.3d 503, 506 (2003) (explaining that good cause requires showing that an impediment external to the defense prevented compliance with the procedural default rules and may be met by showing that the legal basis for the claim was not reasonably available to be timely raised). 2020See Hathaway v. State, 119 Nev. 248, 252 , 71 P.3d 503, 506 (2003) (explaining that good cause requires showing that an impediment external to the defense prevented compliance with the procedural default rules and may be met by showing that the legal basis for the claim was not reasonably available to be timely raised). | 5 | 5 |
Bejarano v. Stategreen2 sentences2011See Bejarano v. State, 122 Nev. 1066, 1072 , 146 P.3d 265, 270 (2006) (recognizing that good cause may be established where the legal basis for a claim was not reasonably available). 2011See Bejarano v. State, 122 Nev. 1066, 1072 , 146 P.3d 265, 270 (2006) (recognizing that good cause may be established where the legal basis for a claim was not reasonably available). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Colwell v. State
green
2 sentences2011The State did not dispute that Graham applied retroactively pursuant to the retroactivity analysis set forth in Colwell v. State, 118 Nev. 807 , 59 P.3d 463 (2002), and would provide good cause in this case. 2011The State did not dispute that Graham applied retroactively pursuant to the retroactivity analysis set forth in Colwell v. State, 118 Nev. 807 , 59 P.3d 463 (2002), and would provide good cause in this case. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.