Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1868–2002 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dzenutis v. Dzenutisgreen2 sentences2002Although General Statutes § 52-504 authorizes the CT Page 9508 recovery of medical expenses in an action solely in behalf of the injured child and makes the recovery in such action a bar to any claim by the parent for such expenses, the statue does not mandate that procedure." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Dzenutis v. Dzenutis , 200 Conn. 290 , 308 , 512 A.2d 130 (1986). 2002Although General Statutes § 52-504 authorizes the CT Page 9508 recovery of medical expenses in an action solely in behalf of the injured child and makes the recovery in such action a bar to any claim by the parent for such expenses, the statue does not mandate that procedure." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Dzenutis v. Dzenutis , 200 Conn. 290 , 308 , 512 A.2d 130 (1986). | 1 | 5 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Quinn v. Gilormine
green
2 sentences1986Quinn v. Gilormine, 32 Conn. Sup. 156, 158 , 344 A.2d 275 (1975). 1986Quinn v. Gilormine, 32 Conn. Sup. 156, 158 , 344 A.2d 275 (1975). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Hieble v. Hieble
green
2 sentences1983Hieble v. Hieble, 164 Conn. 56, 59 , 316 A.2d 777 (1972). *483 With respect to the defendants’ claim that the statute of limitations bars the action, the letter from the defendant Bartlett to the partners of Barwil, Ltd.; see footnote 7, supra; could possibly be construed as a promise to convey the property, thus removing the bar created by the statute of limitations. 1983Hieble v. Hieble, 164 Conn. 56, 59 , 316 A.2d 777 (1972). *483 With respect to the defendants’ claim that the statute of limitations bars the action, the letter from the defendant Bartlett to the partners of Barwil, Ltd.; see footnote 7, supra; could possibly be construed as a promise to convey the property, thus removing the bar created by the statute of limitations. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Mills v. Argall
neutral
1 sentence1868In New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania the provision in question constitutes a separate section and is as follows : “ In case of the insolvency or bankruptcy of the partnership, no special partner shall under any circumstances be allowed to claim as a creditor, until the claims of all the other creditors of the partnership shall be satisfied.” In 1837 Chancellor Walworth in the case of Mills v. Argall, 6 Paige 577 , held that section a bar to any claim for a debt by a special partner, until the claims of other creditors of the partnership were satisfied, and held an assignment preferring suc | 1 | 1868–1868 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.