defendant to assert claim (Connecticut) · Go Syfert
← Connecticut issues

defendant to assert claim in Connecticut

8 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1929–2024 4 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Adesokan v. Bloomfieldgreen
conn · 2023 · cited in 4 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
2 sentences

2024See Adesokan v. Bloomfield, 347 Conn. 416 , 446–47, 297 A.3d 983 (2023) (‘‘it is well established that ‘the primary responsibility for formulating public policy must remain with the legis- lature,’ ’’ and, ‘‘[o]nce the legislature has made its policy choice through statute, we are constrained to interpret the statutory language, not to decide on and implement our own policy choices’’).

2024See Adesokan v. Bloomfield, 347 Conn. 416 , 446–47, 297 A.3d 983 (2023) (‘‘it is well established that ‘the primary responsibility for formulating public policy must remain with the legis- lature,’ ’’ and, ‘‘[o]nce the legislature has made its policy choice through statute, we are constrained to interpret the statutory language, not to decide on and implement our own policy choices’’).

44
Dowling v. Finley Associates, Inc.green
conn · 1999 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
2 sentences

2006See Dowling v. Finley Associates, Inc., 248 Conn. 364, 374 , 727 A.2d 1245 (1999); Delahunty v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Ins.

2006See Dowling v. Finley Associates, Inc., 248 Conn. 364, 374 , 727 A.2d 1245 (1999); Delahunty v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Ins.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Lawrence neutral
connappct · 2005
2 sentences

2007State v. Lawrence, 86 Conn. App. 784, 786 , 863 A.2d 235 (2005).

2007State v. Lawrence, 86 Conn. App. 784, 786 , 863 A.2d 235 (2005).

12007–2007
State v. Lawrence green
conn · 2006
2 sentences

2007In this opinion the other justices concurred. 1 We granted the defendant’s petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the Appellate Court, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to consider the defendant’s motion to correct an illegal sentence?” State v. Lawrence, 277 Conn. 901 , 891 A.2d 4 (2006). 2 Practice Book § 43-22 provides: “The judicial authority may at any time correct an illegal sentence or other illegal disposition, or it may correct a sentence imposed in an illegal manner or

2007In this opinion the other justices concurred. 1 We granted the defendant’s petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the Appellate Court, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to consider the defendant’s motion to correct an illegal sentence?” State v. Lawrence, 277 Conn. 901 , 891 A.2d 4 (2006). 2 Practice Book § 43-22 provides: “The judicial authority may at any time correct an illegal sentence or other illegal disposition, or it may correct a sentence imposed in an illegal manner or

12007–2007
Maresca v. DeMatteo green
connappct · 1986
1 sentence

1994Associated East Mortgage and Maresca , supra. In Eichman v. J J Building Co. , supra, the phrase is used to distinguish the mandatory duty of a referee to assign a value to land in a condemnation proceeding from the authority of the court in a deficiency judgment hearing, as in other civil actions, to find that the plaintiff had not carried the burden of proving adequately the value of the real property so that any value could be assigned to it.

11994–1994
Snelling v. Merritt green
· 1911
2 sentences

1929Snelling v. Merritt, 85 Conn. 83, 91 , 81 Atl. 1039 .

1929Snelling v. Merritt, 85 Conn. 83, 91 , 81 Atl. 1039 .

11929–1929

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 1-2z (4) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 47a-7 (4) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 49-51 (4) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 49-73a (4) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 51-199 (4) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-471 (4) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-266 (4) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-267 (4) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-268 (4) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-270 (4) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 8-270a (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CT 8 (1929–2024) NY 5 (1988–2018) LA 5 (1978–2020) CA 4 (2002–2015) WV 2 (1983–2003) MO 2 (1988–1997) NE 2 (1964–2022) NC 2 (1953–2003) WA 2 (1999–1999) KY 2 (1907–1978)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check