plaintiff alleges violation in Connecticut

1996Wilful misconduct "is conduct that displays a reckless disregard for the safety and rights of others and the consequences of one's actions." Doe v. CT Page 2809 Marselle, 38 Conn. App. 360 , 367 , 660 A.2d 871 (1995).

1996Wilful misconduct "is conduct that displays a reckless disregard for the safety and rights of others and the consequences of one's actions." Doe v. CT Page 2809 Marselle, 38 Conn. App. 360 , 367 , 660 A.2d 871 (1995).

2000General Statutes § 42-110g (a) provides, in relevant part, that for "[a]ny person who suffers any ascertainable loss" as a result of violation of General Statutes § 42-110b , "[t]he court may, in its discretion, award punitive damages and may provide such equitable relief as it deems necessary or proper." Such damages may be awarded in the discretion of the court "even if [the court] finds that the plaintiff has not suffered ascertainable damages." Jacques All Trades Corp. v. Brown, 42 Conn. App. 124 , 131 , 679 A.2d 27 , cert. granted in part, 239 Conn. 914 , 682 A.2d 1001 (1996), cert. grant

2000General Statutes § 42-110g (a) provides, in relevant part, that for "[a]ny person who suffers any ascertainable loss" as a result of violation of General Statutes § 42-110b , "[t]he court may, in its discretion, award punitive damages and may provide such equitable relief as it deems necessary or proper." Such damages may be awarded in the discretion of the court "even if [the court] finds that the plaintiff has not suffered ascertainable damages." Jacques All Trades Corp. v. Brown, 42 Conn. App. 124 , 131 , 679 A.2d 27 , cert. granted in part, 239 Conn. 914 , 682 A.2d 1001 (1996), cert. grant

2000General Statutes § 42-110g (a) provides, in relevant part, that for "[a]ny person who suffers any ascertainable loss" as a result of violation of General Statutes § 42-110b , "[t]he court may, in its discretion, award punitive damages and may provide such equitable relief as it deems necessary or proper." Such damages may be awarded in the discretion of the court "even if [the court] finds that the plaintiff has not suffered ascertainable damages." Jacques All Trades Corp. v. Brown, 42 Conn. App. 124 , 131 , 679 A.2d 27 , cert. granted in part, 239 Conn. 914 , 682 A.2d 1001 (1996), cert. grant

2000General Statutes § 42-110g (a) provides, in relevant part, that for "[a]ny person who suffers any ascertainable loss" as a result of violation of General Statutes § 42-110b , "[t]he court may, in its discretion, award punitive damages and may provide such equitable relief as it deems necessary or proper." Such damages may be awarded in the discretion of the court "even if [the court] finds that the plaintiff has not suffered ascertainable damages." Jacques All Trades Corp. v. Brown, 42 Conn. App. 124 , 131 , 679 A.2d 27 , cert. granted in part, 239 Conn. 914 , 682 A.2d 1001 (1996), cert. grant

2000General Statutes § 42-110g (a) provides, in relevant part, that for "[a]ny person who suffers any ascertainable loss" as a result of violation of General Statutes § 42-110b , "[t]he court may, in its discretion, award punitive damages and may provide such equitable relief as it deems necessary or proper." Such damages may be awarded in the discretion of the court "even if [the court] finds that the plaintiff has not suffered ascertainable damages." Jacques All Trades Corp. v. Brown, 42 Conn. App. 124 , 131 , 679 A.2d 27 , cert. granted in part, 239 Conn. 914 , 682 A.2d 1001 (1996), cert. grant

2000General Statutes § 42-110g (a) provides, in relevant part, that for "[a]ny person who suffers any ascertainable loss" as a result of violation of General Statutes § 42-110b , "[t]he court may, in its discretion, award punitive damages and may provide such equitable relief as it deems necessary or proper." Such damages may be awarded in the discretion of the court "even if [the court] finds that the plaintiff has not suffered ascertainable damages." Jacques All Trades Corp. v. Brown, 42 Conn. App. 124 , 131 , 679 A.2d 27 , cert. granted in part, 239 Conn. 914 , 682 A.2d 1001 (1996), cert. grant

2000General Statutes § 42-110g (a) provides, in relevant part, that for "[a]ny person who suffers any ascertainable loss" as a result of violation of General Statutes § 42-110b , "[t]he court may, in its discretion, award punitive damages and may provide such equitable relief as it deems necessary or proper." Such damages may be awarded in the discretion of the court "even if [the court] finds that the plaintiff has not suffered ascertainable damages." Jacques All Trades Corp. v. Brown, 42 Conn. App. 124 , 131 , 679 A.2d 27 , cert. granted in part, 239 Conn. 914 , 682 A.2d 1001 (1996), cert. grant

2000General Statutes § 42-110g (a) provides, in relevant part, that for "[a]ny person who suffers any ascertainable loss" as a result of violation of General Statutes § 42-110b , "[t]he court may, in its discretion, award punitive damages and may provide such equitable relief as it deems necessary or proper." Such damages may be awarded in the discretion of the court "even if [the court] finds that the plaintiff has not suffered ascertainable damages." Jacques All Trades Corp. v. Brown, 42 Conn. App. 124 , 131 , 679 A.2d 27 , cert. granted in part, 239 Conn. 914 , 682 A.2d 1001 (1996), cert. grant

1999In that case, the Connecticut Supreme Court determined that CUTPA does not cover claims of professional negligence unless the plaintiff alleges a violation of the "entrepreneurial or business aspect of the profession . . . ." Haynes v. Yale-New Haven Hospital , 243 Conn. 17 , 38 , 699 A.2d 964 (1997).

1999In that case, the Connecticut Supreme Court determined that CUTPA does not cover claims of professional negligence unless the plaintiff alleges a violation of the "entrepreneurial or business aspect of the profession . . . ." Haynes v. Yale-New Haven Hospital , 243 Conn. 17 , 38 , 699 A.2d 964 (1997).

1997The Court will first address the joint motion for protective order and order to seal the file. "`[T]he decision as to access [to judicial records] is one best left to the sound discretion of the trial court, a discretion to be exercised in light of the relevant facts and circumstances of the particular case.'" DiRussa v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. , 121 F.3d 818 , 826 (2d cir. 1997), quoting Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc. , 435 U.S. 589 , 599 (1978). "`The adjudicative process . . . is a function of the law which is derived from the community's delegation to the courts and to the legisla

1997The Court will first address the joint motion for protective order and order to seal the file. "`[T]he decision as to access [to judicial records] is one best left to the sound discretion of the trial court, a discretion to be exercised in light of the relevant facts and circumstances of the particular case.'" DiRussa v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. , 121 F.3d 818 , 826 (2d cir. 1997), quoting Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc. , 435 U.S. 589 , 599 (1978). "`The adjudicative process . . . is a function of the law which is derived from the community's delegation to the courts and to the legisla

1995In Borkowski v. Borkowski, 228 Conn. 729 (C.L.J.

1990Fetterman v. University of Connecticut, 192 Conn. 539 , 550 (1984); Sentner v. Board of Trustees, 184 Conn. 339 (1984) Rogan CT Page 3288 v. Board of Trustees. 178 Conn. 579 (1979).

1990Fetterman v. University of Connecticut, 192 Conn. 539 , 550 (1984); Sentner v. Board of Trustees, 184 Conn. 339 (1984) Rogan CT Page 3288 v. Board of Trustees. 178 Conn. 579 (1979).

1990Fetterman v. University of Connecticut, 192 Conn. 539 , 550 (1984); Sentner v. Board of Trustees, 184 Conn. 339 (1984) Rogan CT Page 3288 v. Board of Trustees. 178 Conn. 579 (1979).

1982The plaintiff alleges error (1) in the trial court’s denial of his claim for attorney’s fees and (2) in the trial court’s failure to rule on his claim for double costs and counsel fees pursuant to General Statutes § 52-245. 2 It is well settled that “ ‘ “[t]his court cannot find facts, nor, in the first instance, draw conclusions of facts from primary facts found, but can only review *677 such findings to see whether they might legally, logically and reasonably be found.” ’ Wiegert v. Pequabuck Golf Club, Inc., 150 Conn. 387, 391 , 190 A.2d 43 [1963]; State v. Hudson, [ 154 Conn. 631, 634 , 22

1982The plaintiff alleges error (1) in the trial court’s denial of his claim for attorney’s fees and (2) in the trial court’s failure to rule on his claim for double costs and counsel fees pursuant to General Statutes § 52-245. 2 It is well settled that “ ‘ “[t]his court cannot find facts, nor, in the first instance, draw conclusions of facts from primary facts found, but can only review *677 such findings to see whether they might legally, logically and reasonably be found.” ’ Wiegert v. Pequabuck Golf Club, Inc., 150 Conn. 387, 391 , 190 A.2d 43 [1963]; State v. Hudson, [ 154 Conn. 631, 634 , 22

1982The plaintiff alleges error (1) in the trial court’s denial of his claim for attorney’s fees and (2) in the trial court’s failure to rule on his claim for double costs and counsel fees pursuant to General Statutes § 52-245. 2 It is well settled that “ ‘ “[t]his court cannot find facts, nor, in the first instance, draw conclusions of facts from primary facts found, but can only review *677 such findings to see whether they might legally, logically and reasonably be found.” ’ Wiegert v. Pequabuck Golf Club, Inc., 150 Conn. 387, 391 , 190 A.2d 43 [1963]; State v. Hudson, [ 154 Conn. 631, 634 , 22

1982The plaintiff alleges error (1) in the trial court’s denial of his claim for attorney’s fees and (2) in the trial court’s failure to rule on his claim for double costs and counsel fees pursuant to General Statutes § 52-245. 2 It is well settled that “ ‘ “[t]his court cannot find facts, nor, in the first instance, draw conclusions of facts from primary facts found, but can only review *677 such findings to see whether they might legally, logically and reasonably be found.” ’ Wiegert v. Pequabuck Golf Club, Inc., 150 Conn. 387, 391 , 190 A.2d 43 [1963]; State v. Hudson, [ 154 Conn. 631, 634 , 22

1982The plaintiff alleges error (1) in the trial court’s denial of his claim for attorney’s fees and (2) in the trial court’s failure to rule on his claim for double costs and counsel fees pursuant to General Statutes § 52-245. 2 It is well settled that “ ‘ “[t]his court cannot find facts, nor, in the first instance, draw conclusions of facts from primary facts found, but can only review *677 such findings to see whether they might legally, logically and reasonably be found.” ’ Wiegert v. Pequabuck Golf Club, Inc., 150 Conn. 387, 391 , 190 A.2d 43 [1963]; State v. Hudson, [ 154 Conn. 631, 634 , 22

1982The plaintiff alleges error (1) in the trial court’s denial of his claim for attorney’s fees and (2) in the trial court’s failure to rule on his claim for double costs and counsel fees pursuant to General Statutes § 52-245. 2 It is well settled that “ ‘ “[t]his court cannot find facts, nor, in the first instance, draw conclusions of facts from primary facts found, but can only review *677 such findings to see whether they might legally, logically and reasonably be found.” ’ Wiegert v. Pequabuck Golf Club, Inc., 150 Conn. 387, 391 , 190 A.2d 43 [1963]; State v. Hudson, [ 154 Conn. 631, 634 , 22

1982The plaintiff alleges error (1) in the trial court’s denial of his claim for attorney’s fees and (2) in the trial court’s failure to rule on his claim for double costs and counsel fees pursuant to General Statutes § 52-245. 2 It is well settled that “ ‘ “[t]his court cannot find facts, nor, in the first instance, draw conclusions of facts from primary facts found, but can only review *677 such findings to see whether they might legally, logically and reasonably be found.” ’ Wiegert v. Pequabuck Golf Club, Inc., 150 Conn. 387, 391 , 190 A.2d 43 [1963]; State v. Hudson, [ 154 Conn. 631, 634 , 22

1982The plaintiff alleges error (1) in the trial court’s denial of his claim for attorney’s fees and (2) in the trial court’s failure to rule on his claim for double costs and counsel fees pursuant to General Statutes § 52-245. 2 It is well settled that “ ‘ “[t]his court cannot find facts, nor, in the first instance, draw conclusions of facts from primary facts found, but can only review *677 such findings to see whether they might legally, logically and reasonably be found.” ’ Wiegert v. Pequabuck Golf Club, Inc., 150 Conn. 387, 391 , 190 A.2d 43 [1963]; State v. Hudson, [ 154 Conn. 631, 634 , 22

1982The plaintiff alleges error (1) in the trial court’s denial of his claim for attorney’s fees and (2) in the trial court’s failure to rule on his claim for double costs and counsel fees pursuant to General Statutes § 52-245. 2 It is well settled that “ ‘ “[t]his court cannot find facts, nor, in the first instance, draw conclusions of facts from primary facts found, but can only review *677 such findings to see whether they might legally, logically and reasonably be found.” ’ Wiegert v. Pequabuck Golf Club, Inc., 150 Conn. 387, 391 , 190 A.2d 43 [1963]; State v. Hudson, [ 154 Conn. 631, 634 , 22

1982The plaintiff alleges error (1) in the trial court’s denial of his claim for attorney’s fees and (2) in the trial court’s failure to rule on his claim for double costs and counsel fees pursuant to General Statutes § 52-245. 2 It is well settled that “ ‘ “[t]his court cannot find facts, nor, in the first instance, draw conclusions of facts from primary facts found, but can only review *677 such findings to see whether they might legally, logically and reasonably be found.” ’ Wiegert v. Pequabuck Golf Club, Inc., 150 Conn. 387, 391 , 190 A.2d 43 [1963]; State v. Hudson, [ 154 Conn. 631, 634 , 22

1982The plaintiff alleges error (1) in the trial court’s denial of his claim for attorney’s fees and (2) in the trial court’s failure to rule on his claim for double costs and counsel fees pursuant to General Statutes § 52-245. 2 It is well settled that “ ‘ “[t]his court cannot find facts, nor, in the first instance, draw conclusions of facts from primary facts found, but can only review *677 such findings to see whether they might legally, logically and reasonably be found.” ’ Wiegert v. Pequabuck Golf Club, Inc., 150 Conn. 387, 391 , 190 A.2d 43 [1963]; State v. Hudson, [ 154 Conn. 631, 634 , 22

1982The plaintiff alleges error (1) in the trial court’s denial of his claim for attorney’s fees and (2) in the trial court’s failure to rule on his claim for double costs and counsel fees pursuant to General Statutes § 52-245. 2 It is well settled that “ ‘ “[t]his court cannot find facts, nor, in the first instance, draw conclusions of facts from primary facts found, but can only review *677 such findings to see whether they might legally, logically and reasonably be found.” ’ Wiegert v. Pequabuck Golf Club, Inc., 150 Conn. 387, 391 , 190 A.2d 43 [1963]; State v. Hudson, [ 154 Conn. 631, 634 , 22

1982The plaintiff alleges error (1) in the trial court’s denial of his claim for attorney’s fees and (2) in the trial court’s failure to rule on his claim for double costs and counsel fees pursuant to General Statutes § 52-245. 2 It is well settled that “ ‘ “[t]his court cannot find facts, nor, in the first instance, draw conclusions of facts from primary facts found, but can only review *677 such findings to see whether they might legally, logically and reasonably be found.” ’ Wiegert v. Pequabuck Golf Club, Inc., 150 Conn. 387, 391 , 190 A.2d 43 [1963]; State v. Hudson, [ 154 Conn. 631, 634 , 22