Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Orr v. Stategreen1 sentence2025See Orr v. State, 402 So. 2d 535 , 535−36 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981) (finding “it was error for the trial court to sentence [appellant] to consecutive sentences without first notifying [appellant] that the trial court was going to do so and allowing [appellant] the opportunity to withdraw his plea” where statements made at the plea hearing reflected that the plea agreement was set for appellant to receive a maximum prison sentence and appellant’s consecutive sentences exceeded that maximum sentence). | 1 | 1 |
Jackman v. Stategreen1 sentence2017Generally, “a trial court has authority to consider or to defer ruling and stay a subsequently filed postconviction motion that raises unrelated issues notwithstanding the pendency of an appeal of an order on a previously filed postcon-viction motion.” Jackman v. State, 88 So.3d 325, 327 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). | 1 | 1 |
Freeman v. Stategreen1 sentence2016However, because the record does not conclusively refute Black’s claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to call co-defendant, Philip Snead, as a witness, we reverse the summary denial of Ground Seven and remand for attachment of portions of the record conclusively refuting that claim or for an evidentiary hearing. 1 See Freeman v. State, 761 So.2d 1055, 1061 (Fla.2000) (“[A] defendant is entitled to an evi-dentiary hearing on a postconviction relief motion unless (1) the motion, files, and records in the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief, or (2) the moti | 1 | 1 |
Doe v. Thompsongreen1 sentence2000See Doe v. Thompson, 620 So.2d 1004 (Fla.1993); Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So.2d 499 (Fla.1989). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Joshua Walker v. State
green
2 sentences2020He relies on Walker v. State, 223 So. 3d 388 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) and State v. Dorsey, 5 So. 3d 702 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) for support. 2020He relies on Walker v. State, 223 So. 3d 388 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017), and State v. Dorsey, 5 So. 3d 702 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009), for support. | 2 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Dorsey
green
2 sentences2020He relies on Walker v. State, 223 So. 3d 388 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) and State v. Dorsey, 5 So. 3d 702 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) for support. 2020He relies on Walker v. State, 223 So. 3d 388 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017), and State v. Dorsey, 5 So. 3d 702 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009), for support. | 2 | 2020–2020 |
Maharaj v. State
green
1 sentence2016However, because the record does not conclusively refute Black’s claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to call co-defendant, Philip Snead, as a witness, we reverse the summary denial of Ground Seven and remand for attachment of portions of the record conclusively refuting that claim or for an evidentiary hearing. 1 See Freeman v. State, 761 So.2d 1055, 1061 (Fla.2000) (“[A] defendant is entitled to an evi-dentiary hearing on a postconviction relief motion unless (1) the motion, files, and records in the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief, or (2) the moti | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais
green
1 sentence2000See Doe v. Thompson, 620 So.2d 1004 (Fla.1993); Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So.2d 499 (Fla.1989). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
McCleskey v. Kemp
green
2 sentences1995Id. at 287 , 107 S.Ct. at 1764 . 1995Id. at 287 , 107 S.Ct. at 1764 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Koenig v. State
green
1 sentence1992As these matters cast considerable doubt that the record affirmatively demonstrates Black’s plea was voluntarily and intelligently made, Koenig, 597 So.2d 256 on remand the trial court should consider taking appropriate steps to correct them. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.