Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1991–2006 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Robinson v. State
green
2 sentences1993Among the numerous claims rejected on appeal, we rejected Ponticelli's tenth claim regarding the constitutionality of the aggravating factors of heinous, atrocious, or cruel, and cold, calculated, and premeditated [1] based on our decision in Robinson v. State, 574 So.2d 108 , 113 n. 6 (Fla.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 131 , 116 L.Ed.2d 99 (1991). 1992E.g., Young; Robinson v. State, 574 So.2d 108 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 131 , 116 L.Ed.2d 99 (1991). | 7 | 1991–1993 |
Ponticelli v. State
green
1 sentence2006Id. at 487 n. 4 (citations omitted). [6] Ponticelli's initial motion for postconviction relief was filed on April 10, 1995, and his fifth amended motion was filed on July 31, 1998. [7] Huff v. State, 622 So.2d 982 (Fla.1993). [8] Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). [9] Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 , 92 S.Ct. 763 , 31 L.Ed.2d 104 (1972). [10] The evidentiary hearings took place on the following dates: July 10-14, 2000; October 16-17, 2000; January 29-30, 2001; and May 24, 2001. [11] Ponticelli's brief on appeal approaches this issue broadly, arguing | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Huff v. State
green
1 sentence2006Id. at 487 n. 4 (citations omitted). [6] Ponticelli's initial motion for postconviction relief was filed on April 10, 1995, and his fifth amended motion was filed on July 31, 1998. [7] Huff v. State, 622 So.2d 982 (Fla.1993). [8] Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). [9] Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 , 92 S.Ct. 763 , 31 L.Ed.2d 104 (1972). [10] The evidentiary hearings took place on the following dates: July 10-14, 2000; October 16-17, 2000; January 29-30, 2001; and May 24, 2001. [11] Ponticelli's brief on appeal approaches this issue broadly, arguing | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Brady v. Maryland
green
2 sentences2006Id. at 487 n. 4 (citations omitted). [6] Ponticelli's initial motion for postconviction relief was filed on April 10, 1995, and his fifth amended motion was filed on July 31, 1998. [7] Huff v. State, 622 So.2d 982 (Fla.1993). [8] Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). [9] Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 , 92 S.Ct. 763 , 31 L.Ed.2d 104 (1972). [10] The evidentiary hearings took place on the following dates: July 10-14, 2000; October 16-17, 2000; January 29-30, 2001; and May 24, 2001. [11] Ponticelli's brief on appeal approaches this issue broadly, arguing 2006Id. at 487 n. 4 (citations omitted). [6] Ponticelli's initial motion for postconviction relief was filed on April 10, 1995, and his fifth amended motion was filed on July 31, 1998. [7] Huff v. State, 622 So.2d 982 (Fla.1993). [8] Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). [9] Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 , 92 S.Ct. 763 , 31 L.Ed.2d 104 (1972). [10] The evidentiary hearings took place on the following dates: July 10-14, 2000; October 16-17, 2000; January 29-30, 2001; and May 24, 2001. [11] Ponticelli's brief on appeal approaches this issue broadly, arguing | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Giglio v. United States
green
2 sentences2006Id. at 487 n. 4 (citations omitted). [6] Ponticelli's initial motion for postconviction relief was filed on April 10, 1995, and his fifth amended motion was filed on July 31, 1998. [7] Huff v. State, 622 So.2d 982 (Fla.1993). [8] Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). [9] Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 , 92 S.Ct. 763 , 31 L.Ed.2d 104 (1972). [10] The evidentiary hearings took place on the following dates: July 10-14, 2000; October 16-17, 2000; January 29-30, 2001; and May 24, 2001. [11] Ponticelli's brief on appeal approaches this issue broadly, arguing 2006Id. at 487 n. 4 (citations omitted). [6] Ponticelli's initial motion for postconviction relief was filed on April 10, 1995, and his fifth amended motion was filed on July 31, 1998. [7] Huff v. State, 622 So.2d 982 (Fla.1993). [8] Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). [9] Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 , 92 S.Ct. 763 , 31 L.Ed.2d 104 (1972). [10] The evidentiary hearings took place on the following dates: July 10-14, 2000; October 16-17, 2000; January 29-30, 2001; and May 24, 2001. [11] Ponticelli's brief on appeal approaches this issue broadly, arguing | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.