Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1960–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pressman v. Wolfgreen1 sentence2018As this Court held in Pressman v. Wolf, 732 So. 2d 356, 362 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), Johnson v. Davis does not extend to conditions that “were readily observable and/or within the buyer’s ability to know or easily discover.”10 3. | 1 | 1 |
State v. DiGuiliogreen1 sentence1998"Any comment which is fairly susceptible of being interpreted as a comment on silence will be treated as such." State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129, 1139 (Fla.1986); Carr v. State, 561 So.2d 617 (Fla. 5th DA 1990). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lamb v. State
green
2 sentences2011The rule does not place a time limitation on an offer and waiver of counsel.” Id. 1998Since there was no change in that critical stage, rule 3.111(d)(5) does not come into play and no error occurred. 535 So.2d at 699 . | 2 | 1998–2011 |
Martin v. Brousseau
green
1 sentence1999In Martin , the Fourth District considered whether it was permissible for a person who makes an offer of judgment under section 768.79, Florida Statutes, to include in the offer a requirement that the offeree "execute a full and complete release and satisfaction, a hold harmless affidavit, and a stipulation for dismissal with prejudice." Id. at 241 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Carr v. State
green
1 sentence1998"Any comment which is fairly susceptible of being interpreted as a comment on silence will be treated as such." State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129, 1139 (Fla.1986); Carr v. State, 561 So.2d 617 (Fla. 5th DA 1990). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Fernandez v. Chamberlain
green
1 sentence1971Fernandez v. Chamberlain, 201 So.2d 781 (2d D.C.A. 1967). | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Young Spring & Wire Corp. v. Smith
green
1 sentence1967Young Spring & Wire Corp. v. Smith, Florida Supreme Court, 1965, 176 So.2d 903 , and cases cited. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Cherry, Et Ux. v. Heffernan
green
1 sentence1960Our Supreme Court, in excusing the filing of defendant's return receipt as required by the statute, said [ 132 Fla. 386 , 182 So. 429 ]: "The purpose of the act was to give the classes named therein notice of any action brought against them that they *747 might submit themselves to the jurisdiction of the court and offer such defense as they may be advised. | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.