Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Regency Inn v. Johnsongreen1 sentence1986First, it was noted that a disability award must be determined by the deputy upon consideration of all the relevant factors, in addition *631 to impairment, i.e., "`age, industrial history, training and education, motivation, work experience, work record, diligence and the like.' Regency Inn v. Johnson, 422 So.2d 870, 877, note 5 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); H.S. | 1 | 1 |
Florida Com'n on Human Rel. v. Human, Etc.green1 sentence1983In Florida Commission on Human Relations v. Human Development Center, 413 So.2d 1251, 1253-54 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), this court reversed a hearing officer's order invalidating a rule as beyond the agency's statutory powers. | 1 | 1 |
Department of Admin. v. Nelsongreen1 sentence1983In Department of Administration, et al. v. Nelson, 424 So.2d 852, 858 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), this court reversed a hearing officer's order invalidating an agency rule as being beyond its legislative authority, and reiterated the principle "that when the agency committed with statutory authority to implement a statute has construed the statute in a permissible way under APA disciplines, that interpretation will be sustained though another interpretation may be possible. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Sears v. State
green
2 sentences2010Likewise, in Sears, 889 So.2d 956 , this court reversed a violation of probation where a trial judge conducted the majority of the questioning of the probation officer and neither counsel was given a chance to examine the witness. 2010Observing that while a trial judge should not be compelled to act out of confusion or a misapprehension of the facts, we found the trial judge had “crossed the line of neutrality and impartiality, and as a result, [the probationer] did not receive a fair and impartial violation of probation hearing.” Id. at 959 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Mabrey v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.
green
1 sentence1992The date of the reversed defense judgment was immaterial. [7] This approach is consistent with the underlying purpose of the rule, for the delay in entry of final judgment occurred because of Rety's rightful refusal to accept an excessive remittitur. [1] Mabrey v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc., 438 So.2d 937 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), illustrates the appropriate application of rule 9.340(c), formerly Florida Appellate Rule 3.15(a). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Cason v. Baskin
green
2 sentences1991This time, in Cason v. Baskin, 159 Fla. 31 , 30 So.2d 635 (Fla. 1947), the court reversed the defense judgment on the basis that the trial court erroneously had allowed the defense to focus on the prominence and literary abilities of Rawlings rather than on the true issue: Was there a general and legitimate public interest in Cason? 1991This time, in Cason v. Baskin, 159 Fla. 31 , 30 So.2d 635 (Fla. 1947), the court reversed the defense judgment on the basis that the trial court erroneously had allowed the defense to focus on the prominence and literary abilities of Rawlings rather than on the true issue: Was there a general and legitimate public interest in Cason? | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Dept. of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. FLA. POLICE BENEV.
green
1 sentence1986Consistent with the foregoing, in Dept. of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. Florida Police Benevolent Association, 400 So.2d 1302 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), the court reversed a hearing officer’s conclusion that certain general orders issued by the agency without benefit of Section 120.54 rulemaking proceedings were illicit rules and hence invalid. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Dept. of Prof. Reg. v. SOC. PROF. LAND SUR.
green
1 sentence1985In Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Professional Engineers v. Florida Society of Professional Land Surveyors, 475 So.2d 939 (Fla. 1st DCA, 1985), this court reversed a hearing officer’s order invalidating proposed rule 21H-18.11(4). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERV. v. Framat Realty, Inc.
green
1 sentence1982In State Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Framat Realty, Inc., 407 So.2d 238 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), this Court reversed the hearing officer's order that the rule exceeded its statutory authority. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.