Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Florida opinions name it 3 courts 1982–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Nelson v. Stategreen1 sentence2026The trial court denied Evans’ request for a Nelson hearing, correctly noting that a trial court need not conduct a Nelson inquiry where the 1 Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975). 2 In Nelson v. State, 274 So. 2d 256, 258-59 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973), the Fourth District held: [W]here a defendant, before the commencement of trial, makes it appear to the trial judge that he desires to discharge his court appointed counsel, the trial judge, in order to protect the indigent's right to effective counsel, should make an inquiry of the defendant as to the reason for the request to discharge. | 1 | 1 |
Insko v. Stategreen1 sentence2009See § 924.051(3), Fla. Stat. (2007); Insko v. State, 969 So.2d 992, 1001 (Fla.2007) (holding that litigant must object at trial to preserve error for review). | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Stategreen1 sentence2001See, e.g., Gallucci v. State, 371 So.2d 148, 150 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Johnson v. State, 679 So.2d 831, 832-33 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). | 1 | 1 |
Gallucci v. Stategreen1 sentence2001See, e.g., Gallucci v. State, 371 So.2d 148, 150 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Johnson v. State, 679 So.2d 831, 832-33 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). | 1 | 1 |
Burton v. GOV Contracting Corp.green1 sentence1990Contra Burton v GOV Contracting Corp., 552 So.2d 293, 298 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989) (summary judgment counteraffidavit must be filed with the court prior to the start of the hearing on the motion); Fla. R. | 1 | 1 |
Austin Co. v. Lindenbergergreen1 sentence1982See Austin Co. v. Lindenberger, 410 So.2d 601 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Goodyear Service Store v. Rockey, 382 So.2d 816, 817 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). | 1 | 1 |
Goodyear Service Store v. Rockeygreen1 sentence1982See Austin Co. v. Lindenberger, 410 So.2d 601 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Goodyear Service Store v. Rockey, 382 So.2d 816, 817 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Faretta v. California
green
1 sentence2026The trial court denied Evans’ request for a Nelson hearing, correctly noting that a trial court need not conduct a Nelson inquiry where the 1 Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975). 2 In Nelson v. State, 274 So. 2d 256, 258-59 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973), the Fourth District held: [W]here a defendant, before the commencement of trial, makes it appear to the trial judge that he desires to discharge his court appointed counsel, the trial judge, in order to protect the indigent's right to effective counsel, should make an inquiry of the defendant as to the reason for the request to discharge. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Segal v. State
green
1 sentence2017Id. at 1280 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Randall v. State
green
1 sentence2008Id. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Wilson v. State
green
1 sentence2003Wilson, 792 So.2d at 603 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.