Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hutchinson Island Club Condominium Ass'n v. DeGrawgreen1 sentence2025Ass’n v. Degraw, 774 So. 2d 37, 39 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (“The failure to challenge the method of impaneling a jury venire is waived if not raised in a timely objection. | 1 | 1 |
Brown v. Stategreen1 sentence2014See Brown v. State, 755 So.2d 616, 687 (Fla.2000) (“Brown contends that his guilt-phase counsel was deficient in failing to question a juror as to the extent of her knowledge of a newspaper account of the trial. | 1 | 1 |
Wilson v. Wainwrightgreen1 sentence2000See Wilson v. Wainwright, 474 So.2d 1162, 1163 (Fla.1985). | 1 | 1 |
Groover v. Singletarygreen1 sentence2000Original appellate counsel's performance was deficient because the failure to raise the voir dire error *311 constituted a serious error or substantial deficiency falling measurably outside the range of professionally acceptable performance; also, petitioner was prejudiced because appellate counsel's deficiency "compromised the appellate process to such a degree as to undermine confidence in the correctness of the result." Groover v. Singletary, 656 So.2d 424, 425 (Fla.1995) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Barnette v. State
green
1 sentence2013Barnette, 768 So.2d at 1246-47 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Johnson v. State
green
1 sentence2012Id. at 641-48 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Johnson v. State
green
1 sentence2012Id. at 653-64 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Lopez v. State
green
1 sentence1984I would reverse upon authority of Lopez v. State, 349 So.2d 1198 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977) and allied cases. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Skelton v. Beall
green
1 sentence1983In Skelton v. Beall, 133 So.2d 477 , 479 n. 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961), this court, noting that the parties did not urge on appeal that the trial judge's absence during argument was error, expressed no view on the subject. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.