accused to prepare defense in Georgia

8 Georgia opinions name it 1 courts 1933–2022 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (10)

Case	Followed	Cited
In Re Atgreen gactapp · 2000 · cited in 4 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2003–2022 2 sentences 2022“To satisfy due process, a delinquency petition must contain sufficient factual details to inform the juvenile of the nature of the offense and must provide data adequate to enable the accused to prepare his defense.” In the Interest of A. T., 246 Ga. App. at 31 . 2014And to satisfy due process, a “petition must contain sufficient factual details to inform the juvenile of the nature of the offense and must provide data adequate to enable the accused to prepare his defense.” In the Interest of A. T., 246 Ga. App. 30, 31 ( 539 SE2d 540 ) (2000) (delinquency petition need not inform juvenile he is being charged with designated felony and could be sentenced to restrictive custody).	3	4
TLT v. Stategreen gactapp · 1975 · cited in 2 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2010–2018 2 sentences 2018To comport with due process, the language of a delinquency petition must pass two tests "(1) it must contain sufficient factual details to inform the juvenile of the nature of the offense; and (2) it must provide data adequate to enable the accused to prepare his defense." T.L.T. , 133 Ga. App. at 897 (1), 212 S.E.2d 650 . 2018To comport with due process, the language of a delinquency petition must pass two tests "(1) it must contain sufficient factual details to inform the juvenile of the nature of the offense; and (2) it must provide data adequate to enable the accused to prepare his defense." T.L.T. , 133 Ga. App. at 897 (1), 212 S.E.2d 650 .	2	2
In Re GAULTgreen scotus · 1967 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018See also In re Gault , 387 U.S. 1 , 33 (III), 87 S.Ct. 1428 , 18 LE2d 527 (1967) (the delinquency petition must "set forth the alleged misconduct with particularity" to satisfy due process); OCGA § 15-11-522 (The delinquency petition must set forth "plainly and with particularity: (1) the facts which bring a child within the jurisdiction of the court[.]"); In the Interest of C.H. , 306 Ga. App. 834 , 837 (4), 703 S.E.2d 407 (2010) (trial court erred in denying special demurrer when petition did not allege misconduct with particularity); cf. C.L.T., 157 Ga. App. at 180 (1), 276 S.E.2d 862 (deli 2018See also In re Gault , 387 U.S. 1 , 33 (III), 87 S.Ct. 1428 , 18 LE2d 527 (1967) (the delinquency petition must "set forth the alleged misconduct with particularity" to satisfy due process); OCGA § 15-11-522 (The delinquency petition must set forth "plainly and with particularity: (1) the facts which bring a child within the jurisdiction of the court[.]"); In the Interest of C.H. , 306 Ga. App. 834 , 837 (4), 703 S.E.2d 407 (2010) (trial court erred in denying special demurrer when petition did not allege misconduct with particularity); cf. C.L.T., 157 Ga. App. at 180 (1), 276 S.E.2d 862 (deli	1	1
CLT v. Stategreen gactapp · 1981 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018See also In re Gault , 387 U.S. 1 , 33 (III), 87 S.Ct. 1428 , 18 LE2d 527 (1967) (the delinquency petition must "set forth the alleged misconduct with particularity" to satisfy due process); OCGA § 15-11-522 (The delinquency petition must set forth "plainly and with particularity: (1) the facts which bring a child within the jurisdiction of the court[.]"); In the Interest of C.H. , 306 Ga. App. 834 , 837 (4), 703 S.E.2d 407 (2010) (trial court erred in denying special demurrer when petition did not allege misconduct with particularity); cf. C.L.T., 157 Ga. App. at 180 (1), 276 S.E.2d 862 (deli 2018See also In re Gault , 387 U.S. 1 , 33 (III), 87 S.Ct. 1428 , 18 LE2d 527 (1967) (the delinquency petition must "set forth the alleged misconduct with particularity" to satisfy due process); OCGA § 15-11-522 (The delinquency petition must set forth "plainly and with particularity: (1) the facts which bring a child within the jurisdiction of the court[.]"); In the Interest of C.H. , 306 Ga. App. 834 , 837 (4), 703 S.E.2d 407 (2010) (trial court erred in denying special demurrer when petition did not allege misconduct with particularity); cf. C.L.T., 157 Ga. App. at 180 (1), 276 S.E.2d 862 (deli	1	1
In the Interest of C. C. C.green gactapp · 1988 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 2 sentences 2010"Due process requires that the juvenile petition must (1) contain sufficient factual details to inform the juvenile of the nature of the offense; and (2) provide data adequate to enable the accused to prepare his defense." (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of C.C.C., 188 Ga. App. 849, 851 (4), 374 S.E.2d 754 (1988). 2010"Due process requires that the juvenile petition must (1) contain sufficient factual details to inform the juvenile of the nature of the offense; and (2) provide data adequate to enable the accused to prepare his defense." (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of C.C.C., 188 Ga. App. 849, 851 (4), 374 S.E.2d 754 (1988).	1	1
Anthony v. Anthonygreen ga · 1977 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997 2 sentences 1997Crocker v. Crocker, 132 Ga. App. 587, 589 ( 208 SE2d 602 ) (1974); see also Anthony v. Anthony, 240 Ga. 155, 157 ( 240 SE2d 45 ) (1977) and cases cited therein; McDaniel v. State, 202 Ga. App. 409, 412 ( 414 SE2d 536 ) (1992); Mijajlovic v. State, 179 Ga. App. 506, 507 ( 347 SE2d 325 ) (1986); Martin v. Waters, 151 Ga. App. 149, 150 ( 259 SE2d 153 ) (1979). 1997Crocker v. Crocker, 132 Ga. App. 587, 589 ( 208 SE2d 602 ) (1974); see also Anthony v. Anthony, 240 Ga. 155, 157 ( 240 SE2d 45 ) (1977) and cases cited therein; McDaniel v. State, 202 Ga. App. 409, 412 ( 414 SE2d 536 ) (1992); Mijajlovic v. State, 179 Ga. App. 506, 507 ( 347 SE2d 325 ) (1986); Martin v. Waters, 151 Ga. App. 149, 150 ( 259 SE2d 153 ) (1979).	1	1
Martin v. Watersgreen gactapp · 1979 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997 2 sentences 1997Crocker v. Crocker, 132 Ga. App. 587, 589 ( 208 SE2d 602 ) (1974); see also Anthony v. Anthony, 240 Ga. 155, 157 ( 240 SE2d 45 ) (1977) and cases cited therein; McDaniel v. State, 202 Ga. App. 409, 412 ( 414 SE2d 536 ) (1992); Mijajlovic v. State, 179 Ga. App. 506, 507 ( 347 SE2d 325 ) (1986); Martin v. Waters, 151 Ga. App. 149, 150 ( 259 SE2d 153 ) (1979). 1997Crocker v. Crocker, 132 Ga. App. 587, 589 ( 208 SE2d 602 ) (1974); see also Anthony v. Anthony, 240 Ga. 155, 157 ( 240 SE2d 45 ) (1977) and cases cited therein; McDaniel v. State, 202 Ga. App. 409, 412 ( 414 SE2d 536 ) (1992); Mijajlovic v. State, 179 Ga. App. 506, 507 ( 347 SE2d 325 ) (1986); Martin v. Waters, 151 Ga. App. 149, 150 ( 259 SE2d 153 ) (1979).	1	1
McDaniel v. Stategreen gactapp · 1992 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997 2 sentences 1997Crocker v. Crocker, 132 Ga. App. 587, 589 ( 208 SE2d 602 ) (1974); see also Anthony v. Anthony, 240 Ga. 155, 157 ( 240 SE2d 45 ) (1977) and cases cited therein; McDaniel v. State, 202 Ga. App. 409, 412 ( 414 SE2d 536 ) (1992); Mijajlovic v. State, 179 Ga. App. 506, 507 ( 347 SE2d 325 ) (1986); Martin v. Waters, 151 Ga. App. 149, 150 ( 259 SE2d 153 ) (1979). 1997Crocker v. Crocker, 132 Ga. App. 587, 589 ( 208 SE2d 602 ) (1974); see also Anthony v. Anthony, 240 Ga. 155, 157 ( 240 SE2d 45 ) (1977) and cases cited therein; McDaniel v. State, 202 Ga. App. 409, 412 ( 414 SE2d 536 ) (1992); Mijajlovic v. State, 179 Ga. App. 506, 507 ( 347 SE2d 325 ) (1986); Martin v. Waters, 151 Ga. App. 149, 150 ( 259 SE2d 153 ) (1979).	1	1
Mijajlovic v. Stategreen gactapp · 1986 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997 2 sentences 1997Crocker v. Crocker, 132 Ga. App. 587, 589 ( 208 SE2d 602 ) (1974); see also Anthony v. Anthony, 240 Ga. 155, 157 ( 240 SE2d 45 ) (1977) and cases cited therein; McDaniel v. State, 202 Ga. App. 409, 412 ( 414 SE2d 536 ) (1992); Mijajlovic v. State, 179 Ga. App. 506, 507 ( 347 SE2d 325 ) (1986); Martin v. Waters, 151 Ga. App. 149, 150 ( 259 SE2d 153 ) (1979). 1997Crocker v. Crocker, 132 Ga. App. 587, 589 ( 208 SE2d 602 ) (1974); see also Anthony v. Anthony, 240 Ga. 155, 157 ( 240 SE2d 45 ) (1977) and cases cited therein; McDaniel v. State, 202 Ga. App. 409, 412 ( 414 SE2d 536 ) (1992); Mijajlovic v. State, 179 Ga. App. 506, 507 ( 347 SE2d 325 ) (1986); Martin v. Waters, 151 Ga. App. 149, 150 ( 259 SE2d 153 ) (1979).	1	1
Crocker v. Crockergreen gactapp · 1974 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997 2 sentences 1997Crocker v. Crocker, 132 Ga. App. 587, 589 ( 208 SE2d 602 ) (1974); see also Anthony v. Anthony, 240 Ga. 155, 157 ( 240 SE2d 45 ) (1977) and cases cited therein; McDaniel v. State, 202 Ga. App. 409, 412 ( 414 SE2d 536 ) (1992); Mijajlovic v. State, 179 Ga. App. 506, 507 ( 347 SE2d 325 ) (1986); Martin v. Waters, 151 Ga. App. 149, 150 ( 259 SE2d 153 ) (1979). 1997Crocker v. Crocker, 132 Ga. App. 587, 589 ( 208 SE2d 602 ) (1974); see also Anthony v. Anthony, 240 Ga. 155, 157 ( 240 SE2d 45 ) (1977) and cases cited therein; McDaniel v. State, 202 Ga. App. 409, 412 ( 414 SE2d 536 ) (1992); Mijajlovic v. State, 179 Ga. App. 506, 507 ( 347 SE2d 325 ) (1986); Martin v. Waters, 151 Ga. App. 149, 150 ( 259 SE2d 153 ) (1979).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

Case	Cited	Years
In the Interest of C. H. green gactapp · 2010 1 sentence 2018See also In re Gault , 387 U.S. 1 , 33 (III), 87 S.Ct. 1428 , 18 LE2d 527 (1967) (the delinquency petition must "set forth the alleged misconduct with particularity" to satisfy due process); OCGA § 15-11-522 (The delinquency petition must set forth "plainly and with particularity: (1) the facts which bring a child within the jurisdiction of the court[.]"); In the Interest of C.H. , 306 Ga. App. 834 , 837 (4), 703 S.E.2d 407 (2010) (trial court erred in denying special demurrer when petition did not allege misconduct with particularity); cf. C.L.T., 157 Ga. App. at 180 (1), 276 S.E.2d 862 (deli	1	2018–2018
In Re Ch neutral gactapp · 2010 1 sentence 2018See also In re Gault , 387 U.S. 1 , 33 (III), 87 S.Ct. 1428 , 18 LE2d 527 (1967) (the delinquency petition must "set forth the alleged misconduct with particularity" to satisfy due process); OCGA § 15-11-522 (The delinquency petition must set forth "plainly and with particularity: (1) the facts which bring a child within the jurisdiction of the court[.]"); In the Interest of C.H. , 306 Ga. App. 834 , 837 (4), 703 S.E.2d 407 (2010) (trial court erred in denying special demurrer when petition did not allege misconduct with particularity); cf. C.L.T., 157 Ga. App. at 180 (1), 276 S.E.2d 862 (deli	1	2018–2018
Sloss Iron & Steel Co. v. South Carolina & G. R. neutral circtdsc · 1908 1 sentence 1933United States v. Smith, 162 Fed. 542 .	1	1933–1933

Statutes the citing opinions construe

GA § 15-11-39 (3) GA § 15-11-40 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 86 (1978–2025) IL 32 (1943–2024) WA 11 (1935–2021) GA 8 (1933–2022) MD 8 (1949–2007) IN 5 (1986–2017) MS 5 (1988–2013) MO 4 (1988–1995) CA 4 (1966–2021) NM 3 (1989–2014) NC 3 (1974–2003) DE 3 (1963–1963) NJ 3 (1979–2025) MI 3 (1943–1968) NY 3 (1973–1990) PA 2 (1978–1979) ME 2 (2007–2015) AL 2 (1965–1975)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check

Your account

Appearance