Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2003 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Southern Guaranty Insurance v. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurancegreen2 sentences1993Co., 257 Ga. 355, 356 ( 359 SE2d 665 ) (1987) (upholding a family exclusion clause in an automobile liability policy)." Empire Fire &c. 1993Co., 257 Ga. 355, 356 ( 359 SE2d 665 ) (1987) (upholding a family exclusion clause in an automobile liability policy)." Empire Fire &c. | 3 | 3 |
Geico v. Dickeygreen2 sentences2003Indeed, GEICO appears to disapprove this type of argument, stating “[t]he difficulty with the conclusion of the district court is that the court leaps from the finding that intrafamily tort immunity is no longer an ironclad doctrine in Georgia to the conclusion that a family exclusion clause is against public policy.” Id. 1989We have stated: “In view of our overriding policy of complete liability coverage for the protection of the public and the insured, if the exclusion were broader than the tort immunity of this state, the exclusion would be against public policy.” GEICO v. Dickey, 255 Ga. 661, 663 ( 340 SE2d 595 ) (1986). | 1 | 2 |
Harbin v. Samsgreen2 sentences1989Harbin v. Sams, 171 Ga. App. 263 ( 319 SE2d 99 ). 1989Harbin v. Sams, 171 Ga. App. 263 ( 319 SE2d 99 ). | 1 | 2 |
Lauer v. Bodnergreen1 sentence1984See Lauer, supra. The trial court did not err in releasing State Farm and dismissing the garnishment. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.