Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Davis v. Stategreen2 sentences2021Accordingly, we find no basis to 9 Davis, 310 Ga. at 551 (2). 10 See generally OCGA § 5-6-38 (a) (“A notice of appeal shall be filed within 30 days after entry of the appealable decision or judgment complained of. . . .”). 11 See generally Perez v. State, 333 Ga. App. 716 ( 776 SE2d 312 ) (2015) (“[I]t is well settled that when the term of court has expired in which a defendant was sentenced pursuant to a guilty plea the trial court lacks jurisdiction to allow the withdrawal of the plea.”) (citation and punctuation omitted). 12 Cf. McDaniel, 311 Ga. at 371 (1). 8 disturb the trial court’s exer 2021Reese and Brown, JJ., concur. 13 Cf. Davis, 310 Ga. at 552 (2) (“Because Davis has failed to show that his appeal of right was lost as a consequence of his counsel’s deficient performance, he has failed to show that he was entitled to an out-of-time appeal on ineffective assistance grounds.”). 9 | 1 | 1 |
McDaniel v. Stategreen1 sentence2021Accordingly, we find no basis to 9 Davis, 310 Ga. at 551 (2). 10 See generally OCGA § 5-6-38 (a) (“A notice of appeal shall be filed within 30 days after entry of the appealable decision or judgment complained of. . . .”). 11 See generally Perez v. State, 333 Ga. App. 716 ( 776 SE2d 312 ) (2015) (“[I]t is well settled that when the term of court has expired in which a defendant was sentenced pursuant to a guilty plea the trial court lacks jurisdiction to allow the withdrawal of the plea.”) (citation and punctuation omitted). 12 Cf. McDaniel, 311 Ga. at 371 (1). 8 disturb the trial court’s exer | 1 | 1 |
Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products, LP v. Ratnergreen1 sentence2021Accordingly, we find no basis to 9 Davis, 310 Ga. at 551 (2). 10 See generally OCGA § 5-6-38 (a) (“A notice of appeal shall be filed within 30 days after entry of the appealable decision or judgment complained of. . . .”). 11 See generally Perez v. State, 333 Ga. App. 716 ( 776 SE2d 312 ) (2015) (“[I]t is well settled that when the term of court has expired in which a defendant was sentenced pursuant to a guilty plea the trial court lacks jurisdiction to allow the withdrawal of the plea.”) (citation and punctuation omitted). 12 Cf. McDaniel, 311 Ga. at 371 (1). 8 disturb the trial court’s exer | 1 | 1 |
Brooks v. Graygreen1 sentence2019In his brief opposing Head’s motion for summary judgment, de Souse argued that the evidence that Head was talking and texting on her cell phone in violation of Georgia law during her trip leading up to when she struck him and his dog would 6 support an award of punitive damages.3 But motor vehicle and traffic-related violations that are not the proximate cause of the automobile accident in question generally will not support an award of punitive damages.4 See Doctoroff v. Perez, 273 Ga. App. 560, 561-562 ( 615 SE2d 623 ) (2005) (defendant’s action of driving without a valid license was not pro | 1 | 1 |
Doctoroff v. Perezgreen2 sentences2019In his brief opposing Head’s motion for summary judgment, de Souse argued that the evidence that Head was talking and texting on her cell phone in violation of Georgia law during her trip leading up to when she struck him and his dog would 6 support an award of punitive damages.3 But motor vehicle and traffic-related violations that are not the proximate cause of the automobile accident in question generally will not support an award of punitive damages.4 See Doctoroff v. Perez, 273 Ga. App. 560, 561-562 ( 615 SE2d 623 ) (2005) (defendant’s action of driving without a valid license was not pro 2019In his brief opposing Head’s motion for summary judgment, de Souse argued that the evidence that Head was talking and texting on her cell phone in violation of Georgia law during her trip leading up to when she struck him and his dog would 6 support an award of punitive damages.3 But motor vehicle and traffic-related violations that are not the proximate cause of the automobile accident in question generally will not support an award of punitive damages.4 See Doctoroff v. Perez, 273 Ga. App. 560, 561-562 ( 615 SE2d 623 ) (2005) (defendant’s action of driving without a valid license was not pro | 1 | 1 |
McWhorter v. Stategreen1 sentence2003See McWhorter, 198 Ga. App. at 493-494 (1); Bell v. State, 156 Ga. App. 190 -191 ( 274 SE2d 153 ) (1980) (burglary conviction upheld where getaway driver waited in car during crime and drove away with burglar in precipitous manner). 2. | 1 | 1 |
Head v. CSX Transportation, Inc.green2 sentences1998Id. 1 We concluded that the successor trial judge was authorized to make this ruling because comparative negligence was an issue and therefore a new trial was precluded under the rationale of Beringause v. Fogleman Truck Lines, 209 Ga. App. 470, 472-473 (3) ( 433 SE2d 398 ) (1993). 1998As noted in the previous appearance of this case, after the original trial judge granted Head’s motion for new trial, CSX moved for reconsideration on the basis of the standard for granting a new trial in FELA cases. 227 Ga. App. at 819, n. 1 . | 1 | 1 |
Beringause v. Fogleman Truck Lines, Inc.green2 sentences1998Id. 1 We concluded that the successor trial judge was authorized to make this ruling because comparative negligence was an issue and therefore a new trial was precluded under the rationale of Beringause v. Fogleman Truck Lines, 209 Ga. App. 470, 472-473 (3) ( 433 SE2d 398 ) (1993). 1998Id. 1 We concluded that the successor trial judge was authorized to make this ruling because comparative negligence was an issue and therefore a new trial was precluded under the rationale of Beringause v. Fogleman Truck Lines, 209 Ga. App. 470, 472-473 (3) ( 433 SE2d 398 ) (1993). | 1 | 1 |
Harrell v. Stategreen2 sentences1995Smith v. State, 263 Ga. 224 (2) ( 430 SE2d 579 ) (1993); Harrell v. State, 253 Ga. 474, 475 (2) ( 321 SE2d 739 ) (1984). 1995Smith v. State, 263 Ga. 224 (2) ( 430 SE2d 579 ) (1993); Harrell v. State, 253 Ga. 474, 475 (2) ( 321 SE2d 739 ) (1984). | 1 | 1 |
Williams v. Stategreen2 sentences1993Even where false testimony was not discovered until after a conviction, "retrial has not been held to be barred by the Double Jeopardy Clause. [Cits.]" Williams v. State, 258 Ga. 305, 312 ( 369 SE2d 232 ) (1988). 1993Even where false testimony was not discovered until after a conviction, "retrial has not been held to be barred by the Double Jeopardy Clause. [Cits.]" Williams v. State, 258 Ga. 305, 312 ( 369 SE2d 232 ) (1988). | 1 | 1 |
Scott v. Stategreen2 sentences1985Brown v. State, 250 Ga. 862, 867 ( 302 SE2d 347 ) (1982); Scott v. State, 250 Ga. 195, 199 ( 297 SE2d 18 ) (1982). 3. 1985Brown v. State, 250 Ga. 862, 867 ( 302 SE2d 347 ) (1982); Scott v. State, 250 Ga. 195, 199 ( 297 SE2d 18 ) (1982). 3. | 1 | 1 |
Blalock v. Blalockgreen1 sentence1985Brown v. State, 250 Ga. 862, 867 ( 302 SE2d 347 ) (1982); Scott v. State, 250 Ga. 195, 199 ( 297 SE2d 18 ) (1982). 3. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Perez v. the State
green
1 sentence2021Accordingly, we find no basis to 9 Davis, 310 Ga. at 551 (2). 10 See generally OCGA § 5-6-38 (a) (“A notice of appeal shall be filed within 30 days after entry of the appealable decision or judgment complained of. . . .”). 11 See generally Perez v. State, 333 Ga. App. 716 ( 776 SE2d 312 ) (2015) (“[I]t is well settled that when the term of court has expired in which a defendant was sentenced pursuant to a guilty plea the trial court lacks jurisdiction to allow the withdrawal of the plea.”) (citation and punctuation omitted). 12 Cf. McDaniel, 311 Ga. at 371 (1). 8 disturb the trial court’s exer | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Bell v. State
green
2 sentences2003See McWhorter, 198 Ga. App. at 493-494 (1); Bell v. State, 156 Ga. App. 190 -191 ( 274 SE2d 153 ) (1980) (burglary conviction upheld where getaway driver waited in car during crime and drove away with burglar in precipitous manner). 2. 2003See McWhorter, 198 Ga. App. at 493-494 (1); Bell v. State, 156 Ga. App. 190 -191 ( 274 SE2d 153 ) (1980) (burglary conviction upheld where getaway driver waited in car during crime and drove away with burglar in precipitous manner). 2. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Matter of Inquiry Concerning a Judge
green
2 sentences1998See In the Matter of: Inquiry Concerning a Judge, 265 Ga. 843 ( 462 SE2d 728 ) (1995). 1998See In the Matter of: Inquiry Concerning a Judge, 265 Ga. 843 ( 462 SE2d 728 ) (1995). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Central of Georgia Railroad v. Carter
green
2 sentences1997Co. v. Carter, 212 Ga. App. 528 ( 442 SE2d 269 ) (1994). 1997Co. v. Carter, 212 Ga. App. 528 ( 442 SE2d 269 ) (1994). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Smith v. State
green
2 sentences1995Smith v. State, 263 Ga. 224 (2) ( 430 SE2d 579 ) (1993); Harrell v. State, 253 Ga. 474, 475 (2) ( 321 SE2d 739 ) (1984). 1995Smith v. State, 263 Ga. 224 (2) ( 430 SE2d 579 ) (1993); Harrell v. State, 253 Ga. 474, 475 (2) ( 321 SE2d 739 ) (1984). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Brown v. State
green
1 sentence1985Brown v. State, 250 Ga. 862, 867 ( 302 SE2d 347 ) (1982); Scott v. State, 250 Ga. 195, 199 ( 297 SE2d 18 ) (1982). 3. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.