Johnson v. Zerbst standard (Georgia) · Go Syfert
← Georgia issues

Johnson v. Zerbst standard in Georgia

8 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1977–1992 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Johnson v. Zerbstred
scotus · 1938 · cited in 6 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1981–1992
2 sentences

1992The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of the right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.’ Johnson v. Zerbst, supra at 464 .

1991The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of the right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.’ Johnson v. Zerbst, supra at 464 .

26
Lazenby v. Stategreen
gactapp · 1987 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987
2 sentences

1987The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of the right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.” Johnson v. Zerbst, supra at 464.’ ” McCook v. State, 178 Ga. App. 276 ( 342 SE2d 757 ) (1986); see also Lazenby v. State, 181 Ga. App. 854 (1) ( 354 SE2d 196 ) (1987); Bradley v. State, 135 Ga. App. 865 (1) ( 219 SE2d 451 ) (1975).

1987The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of the right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.” Johnson v. Zerbst, supra at 464.’ ” McCook v. State, 178 Ga. App. 276 ( 342 SE2d 757 ) (1986); see also Lazenby v. State, 181 Ga. App. 854 (1) ( 354 SE2d 196 ) (1987); Bradley v. State, 135 Ga. App. 865 (1) ( 219 SE2d 451 ) (1975).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Taylor v. Ricketts green
ga · 1977
2 sentences

1992Faretta v. California, supra. Taylor v. Ricketts, 239 Ga. 501 ( 238 SE2d 52 ) (1977), applied the Johnson v. Zerbst standard that ‘A waiver is ordinarily an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege.

1992Faretta v. California, supra. Taylor v. Ricketts, 239 Ga. 501 ( 238 SE2d 52 ) (1977), applied the Johnson v. Zerbst standard that ‘A waiver is ordinarily an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege.

71981–1992
Faretta v. California green
scotus · 1975
2 sentences

1992Faretta v. California, supra. Taylor v. Ricketts, 239 Ga. 501 ( 238 SE2d 52 ) (1977), applied the Johnson v. Zerbst standard that ‘A waiver is ordinarily an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege.

1981Faretta v. California, supra. Taylor v. Ricketts, 239 Ga. 501 ( 238 SE2d 52 ) (1977), applied the Johnson v. Zerbst standard that “A waiver is ordinarily an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege.

31977–1992
McCook v. State green
gactapp · 1986
2 sentences

1987The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of the right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.” Johnson v. Zerbst, supra at 464.’ ” McCook v. State, 178 Ga. App. 276 ( 342 SE2d 757 ) (1986); see also Lazenby v. State, 181 Ga. App. 854 (1) ( 354 SE2d 196 ) (1987); Bradley v. State, 135 Ga. App. 865 (1) ( 219 SE2d 451 ) (1975).

1987The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of the right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.” Johnson v. Zerbst, supra at 464.’ ” McCook v. State, 178 Ga. App. 276 ( 342 SE2d 757 ) (1986); see also Lazenby v. State, 181 Ga. App. 854 (1) ( 354 SE2d 196 ) (1987); Bradley v. State, 135 Ga. App. 865 (1) ( 219 SE2d 451 ) (1975).

11987–1987
Bradley v. State green
gactapp · 1975
2 sentences

1987The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of the right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.” Johnson v. Zerbst, supra at 464.’ ” McCook v. State, 178 Ga. App. 276 ( 342 SE2d 757 ) (1986); see also Lazenby v. State, 181 Ga. App. 854 (1) ( 354 SE2d 196 ) (1987); Bradley v. State, 135 Ga. App. 865 (1) ( 219 SE2d 451 ) (1975).

1987The determination of whether there has been an intelligent waiver of the right to counsel must depend, in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused.” Johnson v. Zerbst, supra at 464.’ ” McCook v. State, 178 Ga. App. 276 ( 342 SE2d 757 ) (1986); see also Lazenby v. State, 181 Ga. App. 854 (1) ( 354 SE2d 196 ) (1987); Bradley v. State, 135 Ga. App. 865 (1) ( 219 SE2d 451 ) (1975).

11987–1987

Where else courts name it

MD 12 (1979–2019) GA 8 (1977–1992) DC 2 (1991–2007)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check