Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Idaho opinions name it 1 courts 1954–1980 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Doran v. Employment Security Agency
green
2 sentences1980It is for this reason that the burden of establishing eligibility is placed upon, and must be borne by, the claimant whenever his claim to benefits is questioned.” 75 Idaho at 98 , 267 P.2d at 631 . 1980It is for this reason that the burden of establishing eligibility is placed upon, and must be borne by, the claimant whenever his claim to benefits is questioned.” 75 Idaho at 98 , 267 P.2d at 631 . | 3 | 1963–1980 |
Burroughs v. Employment Security Agency
green
2 sentences1972Boodry v. Eddy Bakeries Co., supra; Clark v. Bogus Basin Recreational Association, 91 Idaho 916 , 435 P.2d 256 (1967); Burroughs v. Employment Security Agency, 86 Idaho 412 , 387 P.2d 473 (1963); Roby v. Potlatch Forests, 74 Idaho 404 , 263 P.2d 553 (1953). 1972Boodry v. Eddy Bakeries Co., supra; Clark v. Bogus Basin Recreational Association, 91 Idaho 916 , 435 P.2d 256 (1967); Burroughs v. Employment Security Agency, 86 Idaho 412 , 387 P.2d 473 (1963); Roby v. Potlatch Forests, 74 Idaho 404 , 263 P.2d 553 (1953). | 3 | 1964–1972 |
Rogers v. Trim House
green
2 sentences1979At any rate, the burden of establishing eligibility for unemployment compensation benefits is on the claimant whenever the claim is questioned. 6 E. g., Rogers v. Trim House, 99 Idaho 746 , 588 P.2d 945 (1979); Pyeatt v. Idaho State University, 98 Idaho 424 , 565 P.2d 1381 (1977); Flynn v. Amfac Foods, Inc., 97 Idaho 768 , 554 P.2d 946 (1976). 1979At any rate, the burden of establishing eligibility for unemployment compensation benefits is on the claimant whenever the claim is questioned. 6 E. g., Rogers v. Trim House, 99 Idaho 746 , 588 P.2d 945 (1979); Pyeatt v. Idaho State University, 98 Idaho 424 , 565 P.2d 1381 (1977); Flynn v. Amfac Foods, Inc., 97 Idaho 768 , 554 P.2d 946 (1976). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Pyeatt v. Idaho State University
green
2 sentences1979At any rate, the burden of establishing eligibility for unemployment compensation benefits is on the claimant whenever the claim is questioned. 6 E. g., Rogers v. Trim House, 99 Idaho 746 , 588 P.2d 945 (1979); Pyeatt v. Idaho State University, 98 Idaho 424 , 565 P.2d 1381 (1977); Flynn v. Amfac Foods, Inc., 97 Idaho 768 , 554 P.2d 946 (1976). 1979At any rate, the burden of establishing eligibility for unemployment compensation benefits is on the claimant whenever the claim is questioned. 6 E. g., Rogers v. Trim House, 99 Idaho 746 , 588 P.2d 945 (1979); Pyeatt v. Idaho State University, 98 Idaho 424 , 565 P.2d 1381 (1977); Flynn v. Amfac Foods, Inc., 97 Idaho 768 , 554 P.2d 946 (1976). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Flynn v. Amfac Foods, Inc.
green
2 sentences1979At any rate, the burden of establishing eligibility for unemployment compensation benefits is on the claimant whenever the claim is questioned. 6 E. g., Rogers v. Trim House, 99 Idaho 746 , 588 P.2d 945 (1979); Pyeatt v. Idaho State University, 98 Idaho 424 , 565 P.2d 1381 (1977); Flynn v. Amfac Foods, Inc., 97 Idaho 768 , 554 P.2d 946 (1976). 1979At any rate, the burden of establishing eligibility for unemployment compensation benefits is on the claimant whenever the claim is questioned. 6 E. g., Rogers v. Trim House, 99 Idaho 746 , 588 P.2d 945 (1979); Pyeatt v. Idaho State University, 98 Idaho 424 , 565 P.2d 1381 (1977); Flynn v. Amfac Foods, Inc., 97 Idaho 768 , 554 P.2d 946 (1976). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Clark v. Bogus Basin Recreational Association
neutral
2 sentences1972Boodry v. Eddy Bakeries Co., supra; Clark v. Bogus Basin Recreational Association, 91 Idaho 916 , 435 P.2d 256 (1967); Burroughs v. Employment Security Agency, 86 Idaho 412 , 387 P.2d 473 (1963); Roby v. Potlatch Forests, 74 Idaho 404 , 263 P.2d 553 (1953). 1972Boodry v. Eddy Bakeries Co., supra; Clark v. Bogus Basin Recreational Association, 91 Idaho 916 , 435 P.2d 256 (1967); Burroughs v. Employment Security Agency, 86 Idaho 412 , 387 P.2d 473 (1963); Roby v. Potlatch Forests, 74 Idaho 404 , 263 P.2d 553 (1953). | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Roby v. Potlatch Forests, Inc.
green
2 sentences1972Boodry v. Eddy Bakeries Co., supra; Clark v. Bogus Basin Recreational Association, 91 Idaho 916 , 435 P.2d 256 (1967); Burroughs v. Employment Security Agency, 86 Idaho 412 , 387 P.2d 473 (1963); Roby v. Potlatch Forests, 74 Idaho 404 , 263 P.2d 553 (1953). 1972Boodry v. Eddy Bakeries Co., supra; Clark v. Bogus Basin Recreational Association, 91 Idaho 916 , 435 P.2d 256 (1967); Burroughs v. Employment Security Agency, 86 Idaho 412 , 387 P.2d 473 (1963); Roby v. Potlatch Forests, 74 Idaho 404 , 263 P.2d 553 (1953). | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Boodry v. Eddy Bakeries Company
green
2 sentences1967Boodry v. Eddy Bakeries Company, 88 Idaho 165 , 397 P. 2d 256 (1964); Burroughs v. Employment Security Agency, 86 Idaho 412 , 387 P.2d 473 (1963). 1967Boodry v. Eddy Bakeries Company, 88 Idaho 165 , 397 P. 2d 256 (1964); Burroughs v. Employment Security Agency, 86 Idaho 412 , 387 P.2d 473 (1963). | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Claim of Sapp
green
2 sentences1963Custom Meat Packing Company v. Martin, supra; Ankrum v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 274 , 361 P.2d 795 ; Ellis v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 95 , 358 P.2d 396 ; Norman v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 1 , 356 P.2d 913 ; Bean v. Employment Security Agency, 81 Idaho 551 , 347 P.2d 339 ; In re Walker’s Claim, 80 Idaho 420 , 332 P.2d 199 ; Claim of Sapp, 75 Idaho 65 , 266 P.2d 1027 ; Roby v. Potlatch Forests, supra. The findings of the board are sustained by the evidence and the board cor rectly ruled that claimant had not shown good cause for leaving her employment. 1963Custom Meat Packing Company v. Martin, supra; Ankrum v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 274 , 361 P.2d 795 ; Ellis v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 95 , 358 P.2d 396 ; Norman v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 1 , 356 P.2d 913 ; Bean v. Employment Security Agency, 81 Idaho 551 , 347 P.2d 339 ; In re Walker’s Claim, 80 Idaho 420 , 332 P.2d 199 ; Claim of Sapp, 75 Idaho 65 , 266 P.2d 1027 ; Roby v. Potlatch Forests, supra. The findings of the board are sustained by the evidence and the board cor rectly ruled that claimant had not shown good cause for leaving her employment. | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Norman v. Employment Security Agency
neutral
2 sentences1963Custom Meat Packing Company v. Martin, supra; Ankrum v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 274 , 361 P.2d 795 ; Ellis v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 95 , 358 P.2d 396 ; Norman v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 1 , 356 P.2d 913 ; Bean v. Employment Security Agency, 81 Idaho 551 , 347 P.2d 339 ; In re Walker’s Claim, 80 Idaho 420 , 332 P.2d 199 ; Claim of Sapp, 75 Idaho 65 , 266 P.2d 1027 ; Roby v. Potlatch Forests, supra. The findings of the board are sustained by the evidence and the board cor rectly ruled that claimant had not shown good cause for leaving her employment. 1963Custom Meat Packing Company v. Martin, supra; Ankrum v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 274 , 361 P.2d 795 ; Ellis v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 95 , 358 P.2d 396 ; Norman v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 1 , 356 P.2d 913 ; Bean v. Employment Security Agency, 81 Idaho 551 , 347 P.2d 339 ; In re Walker’s Claim, 80 Idaho 420 , 332 P.2d 199 ; Claim of Sapp, 75 Idaho 65 , 266 P.2d 1027 ; Roby v. Potlatch Forests, supra. The findings of the board are sustained by the evidence and the board cor rectly ruled that claimant had not shown good cause for leaving her employment. | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Bean v. Employment Security Agency
green
2 sentences1963Custom Meat Packing Company v. Martin, supra; Ankrum v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 274 , 361 P.2d 795 ; Ellis v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 95 , 358 P.2d 396 ; Norman v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 1 , 356 P.2d 913 ; Bean v. Employment Security Agency, 81 Idaho 551 , 347 P.2d 339 ; In re Walker’s Claim, 80 Idaho 420 , 332 P.2d 199 ; Claim of Sapp, 75 Idaho 65 , 266 P.2d 1027 ; Roby v. Potlatch Forests, supra. The findings of the board are sustained by the evidence and the board cor rectly ruled that claimant had not shown good cause for leaving her employment. 1963Custom Meat Packing Company v. Martin, supra; Ankrum v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 274 , 361 P.2d 795 ; Ellis v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 95 , 358 P.2d 396 ; Norman v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 1 , 356 P.2d 913 ; Bean v. Employment Security Agency, 81 Idaho 551 , 347 P.2d 339 ; In re Walker’s Claim, 80 Idaho 420 , 332 P.2d 199 ; Claim of Sapp, 75 Idaho 65 , 266 P.2d 1027 ; Roby v. Potlatch Forests, supra. The findings of the board are sustained by the evidence and the board cor rectly ruled that claimant had not shown good cause for leaving her employment. | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Ellis v. Employment Security Agency
green
2 sentences1963Custom Meat Packing Company v. Martin, supra; Ankrum v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 274 , 361 P.2d 795 ; Ellis v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 95 , 358 P.2d 396 ; Norman v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 1 , 356 P.2d 913 ; Bean v. Employment Security Agency, 81 Idaho 551 , 347 P.2d 339 ; In re Walker’s Claim, 80 Idaho 420 , 332 P.2d 199 ; Claim of Sapp, 75 Idaho 65 , 266 P.2d 1027 ; Roby v. Potlatch Forests, supra. The findings of the board are sustained by the evidence and the board cor rectly ruled that claimant had not shown good cause for leaving her employment. 1963Custom Meat Packing Company v. Martin, supra; Ankrum v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 274 , 361 P.2d 795 ; Ellis v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 95 , 358 P.2d 396 ; Norman v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 1 , 356 P.2d 913 ; Bean v. Employment Security Agency, 81 Idaho 551 , 347 P.2d 339 ; In re Walker’s Claim, 80 Idaho 420 , 332 P.2d 199 ; Claim of Sapp, 75 Idaho 65 , 266 P.2d 1027 ; Roby v. Potlatch Forests, supra. The findings of the board are sustained by the evidence and the board cor rectly ruled that claimant had not shown good cause for leaving her employment. | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Ankrum v. Employment Security Agency
neutral
2 sentences1963Custom Meat Packing Company v. Martin, supra; Ankrum v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 274 , 361 P.2d 795 ; Ellis v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 95 , 358 P.2d 396 ; Norman v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 1 , 356 P.2d 913 ; Bean v. Employment Security Agency, 81 Idaho 551 , 347 P.2d 339 ; In re Walker’s Claim, 80 Idaho 420 , 332 P.2d 199 ; Claim of Sapp, 75 Idaho 65 , 266 P.2d 1027 ; Roby v. Potlatch Forests, supra. The findings of the board are sustained by the evidence and the board cor rectly ruled that claimant had not shown good cause for leaving her employment. 1963Custom Meat Packing Company v. Martin, supra; Ankrum v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 274 , 361 P.2d 795 ; Ellis v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 95 , 358 P.2d 396 ; Norman v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 1 , 356 P.2d 913 ; Bean v. Employment Security Agency, 81 Idaho 551 , 347 P.2d 339 ; In re Walker’s Claim, 80 Idaho 420 , 332 P.2d 199 ; Claim of Sapp, 75 Idaho 65 , 266 P.2d 1027 ; Roby v. Potlatch Forests, supra. The findings of the board are sustained by the evidence and the board cor rectly ruled that claimant had not shown good cause for leaving her employment. | 1 | 1963–1963 |
In Re Walker's Claim
neutral
2 sentences1963Custom Meat Packing Company v. Martin, supra; Ankrum v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 274 , 361 P.2d 795 ; Ellis v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 95 , 358 P.2d 396 ; Norman v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 1 , 356 P.2d 913 ; Bean v. Employment Security Agency, 81 Idaho 551 , 347 P.2d 339 ; In re Walker’s Claim, 80 Idaho 420 , 332 P.2d 199 ; Claim of Sapp, 75 Idaho 65 , 266 P.2d 1027 ; Roby v. Potlatch Forests, supra. The findings of the board are sustained by the evidence and the board cor rectly ruled that claimant had not shown good cause for leaving her employment. 1963Custom Meat Packing Company v. Martin, supra; Ankrum v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 274 , 361 P.2d 795 ; Ellis v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 95 , 358 P.2d 396 ; Norman v. Employment Security Agency, 83 Idaho 1 , 356 P.2d 913 ; Bean v. Employment Security Agency, 81 Idaho 551 , 347 P.2d 339 ; In re Walker’s Claim, 80 Idaho 420 , 332 P.2d 199 ; Claim of Sapp, 75 Idaho 65 , 266 P.2d 1027 ; Roby v. Potlatch Forests, supra. The findings of the board are sustained by the evidence and the board cor rectly ruled that claimant had not shown good cause for leaving her employment. | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Talley v. Unemploy. Comp. Div.
green
2 sentences1954Talley v. Unemployment Compensation Div., 63 Idaho 644 , 124 P.2d 784 ; In re Jullin, Wash., 158 P.2d 319 ; Wescoe v. Unemployment Compensation Bd. of Rev., 166 Pa.Super. 355 , 71 A.2d 837 ; Broadway v. Bolar, 33 Ala.App. 57 , 29 So. 2d 687 . *99 The order appealed from is affirmed. 1954Talley v. Unemployment Compensation Div., 63 Idaho 644 , 124 P.2d 784 ; In re Jullin, Wash., 158 P.2d 319 ; Wescoe v. Unemployment Compensation Bd. of Rev., 166 Pa.Super. 355 , 71 A.2d 837 ; Broadway v. Bolar, 33 Ala.App. 57 , 29 So. 2d 687 . *99 The order appealed from is affirmed. | 1 | 1954–1954 |
Wescoe Unemployment Compensation Case
green
2 sentences1954Talley v. Unemployment Compensation Div., 63 Idaho 644 , 124 P.2d 784 ; In re Jullin, Wash., 158 P.2d 319 ; Wescoe v. Unemployment Compensation Bd. of Rev., 166 Pa.Super. 355 , 71 A.2d 837 ; Broadway v. Bolar, 33 Ala.App. 57 , 29 So. 2d 687 . *99 The order appealed from is affirmed. 1954Talley v. Unemployment Compensation Div., 63 Idaho 644 , 124 P.2d 784 ; In re Jullin, Wash., 158 P.2d 319 ; Wescoe v. Unemployment Compensation Bd. of Rev., 166 Pa.Super. 355 , 71 A.2d 837 ; Broadway v. Bolar, 33 Ala.App. 57 , 29 So. 2d 687 . *99 The order appealed from is affirmed. | 1 | 1954–1954 |
Riley v. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.
green
1 sentence1954Talley v. Unemployment Compensation Div., 63 Idaho 644 , 124 P.2d 784 ; In re Jullin, Wash., 158 P.2d 319 ; Wescoe v. Unemployment Compensation Bd. of Rev., 166 Pa.Super. 355 , 71 A.2d 837 ; Broadway v. Bolar, 33 Ala.App. 57 , 29 So. 2d 687 . *99 The order appealed from is affirmed. | 1 | 1954–1954 |
Broadway v. Bolar
neutral
2 sentences1954Talley v. Unemployment Compensation Div., 63 Idaho 644 , 124 P.2d 784 ; In re Jullin, Wash., 158 P.2d 319 ; Wescoe v. Unemployment Compensation Bd. of Rev., 166 Pa.Super. 355 , 71 A.2d 837 ; Broadway v. Bolar, 33 Ala.App. 57 , 29 So. 2d 687 . *99 The order appealed from is affirmed. 1954Talley v. Unemployment Compensation Div., 63 Idaho 644 , 124 P.2d 784 ; In re Jullin, Wash., 158 P.2d 319 ; Wescoe v. Unemployment Compensation Bd. of Rev., 166 Pa.Super. 355 , 71 A.2d 837 ; Broadway v. Bolar, 33 Ala.App. 57 , 29 So. 2d 687 . *99 The order appealed from is affirmed. | 1 | 1954–1954 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.