adequate opportunity test (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

adequate opportunity test in Illinois

8 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1977–1994 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
In Re Estate of Suteragreen
illappct · 1990 · cited in 2 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994
2 sentences

1994However, as Sutera stated, "The purpose of the Probate Act is to permit an estate administration to get under way as quickly as possible, and yet to permit those who wish to question the will an adequate opportunity to test the validity of the will." ( Sutera, 199 Ill.App.3d at 541, 145 Ill.Dec. 601 , 557 N.E.2d 371 .) Plaintiff has had an opportunity to make several attempts over a significant period of time to try and sustain a cause of action in this matter.

1994However, as Sutera stated, "The purpose of the Probate Act is to permit an estate administration to get under way as quickly as possible, and yet to permit those who wish to question the will an adequate opportunity to test the validity of the will.” (Sutera, 199 Ill.

12

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Loss v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. neutral
illappct · 1970
2 sentences

1990In re Estate of Carr (1970), 126 Ill.

1990In re Estate of Carr (1970), 126 Ill.

51977–1990
In Re Estate of Ariola green
illappct · 1979
2 sentences

1990App.3d 158, 171 , 386 N.E.2d 862 .) The purpose of the Probate Act is to permit an estate administration to get under way as quickly as possible, and yet to permit those who wish to question the will an adequate opportunity to test the validity of the will.

1990App. 3d 158, 171 , 386 N.E.2d 862 .) The purpose of the Probate Act is to permit an estate administration to get under way as quickly as possible, and yet to permit those who wish to question the will an adequate opportunity to test the validity of the will.

21990–1990
Ruffing v. Glissendorf green
ill · 1968
2 sentences

1977Ruffing v. Glissendorf, 41 Ill. 2d 412 , 243 N.E.2d 236 .) The purpose of the Probate Act is to permit an administration to get under way as quickly as is reasonably possible and yet to permit those who wish to question the will an adequate opportunity to test the validity of the will.

1977Ruffing v. Glissendorf, 41 Ill. 2d 412 , 243 N.E.2d 236 .) The purpose of the Probate Act is to permit an administration to get under way as quickly as is reasonably possible and yet to permit those who wish to question the will an adequate opportunity to test the validity of the will.

21977–1977
Env. Prot. Agency v. Poll. Cont. Bd. neutral
ill · 1986
2 sentences

1987(Cf. 115 Ill. 2d 65 , 503 N.E.2d 343 (Board’s review of Agency’s permit denial limited to consideration of material relied upon by Agency).) We believe Alton was afforded an adequate opportunity here to challenge the reasons given by the Agency for its permit denial and we, accordingly, find no basis upon which to remand the case for further hearing.

1987(Cf. 115 Ill. 2d 65 , 503 N.E.2d 343 (Board’s review of Agency’s permit denial limited to consideration of material relied upon by Agency).) We believe Alton was afforded an adequate opportunity here to challenge the reasons given by the Agency for its permit denial and we, accordingly, find no basis upon which to remand the case for further hearing.

11987–1987

Where else courts name it

IL 8 (1977–1994) NY 5 (1975–2025) CO 5 (2011–2026) NC 4 (2022–2022) NJ 3 (2006–2019) NM 3 (1995–2004) HI 3 (2008–2014) WI 3 (1989–2025) FL 2 (1990–2020) DC 2 (1994–2000) MI 2 (1980–2000) OR 2 (2002–2009)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check