Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1984–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Franciscan Sisters Health Care Corp. v. Dean
green
2 sentences2017The Amount of Evidence Necessary to Rebut the Section 6(f) Presumption ¶ 39 “The amount of evidence that is required from an adversary to meet the presumption is not determined by any fixed rule.” Id. at 463 , 448 N.E.2d at 877 . 2017The Amount of Evidence Necessary to Rebut the Section 6(f) Presumption ¶ 39 “The amount of evidence that is required from an adversary to meet the presumption is not determined by any fixed rule.” Id. at 463 , 448 N.E.2d at 877 . | 4 | 2000–2017 |
In Re JA
green
2 sentences2022Id. 2019App. 3d 553 , 562-63, 736 N.E.2d 678 , 686 (2000). ¶ 46 “The amount of evidence that is required from an adversary to meet the presumption is not determined by any fixed rule. | 2 | 2019–2022 |
Diederich v. Walters
green
2 sentences2000Diederich, 65 Ill.2d at 102 , 2 Ill.Dec. 685 , 357 N.E.2d 1128 . *687 The amount of evidence that is required from an adversary to meet the presumption is not determined by any fixed rule. 2000Diederich, 65 Ill.2d at 102 , 2 Ill.Dec. 685 , 357 N.E.2d 1128 . *687 The amount of evidence that is required from an adversary to meet the presumption is not determined by any fixed rule. | 2 | 1990–2000 |
Tidholm v. Tidholm
green
2 sentences1984App. 3d 427, 436-37 , 369 N.E.2d 1320, 1327 .) Once these elements are shown, the burden is on the proponent of the will to present evidence tending to rebut the presumption (Tidholm v. Tidholm (1945), 391 Ill. 19 , 62 N.E.2d 473 ); however, “[t]he amount of evidence that is required from an adversary to meet the presumption is not determined by any fixed rule. 1984App. 3d 427, 436-37 , 369 N.E.2d 1320, 1327 .) Once these elements are shown, the burden is on the proponent of the will to present evidence tending to rebut the presumption (Tidholm v. Tidholm (1945), 391 Ill. 19 , 62 N.E.2d 473 ); however, “[t]he amount of evidence that is required from an adversary to meet the presumption is not determined by any fixed rule. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Beyers v. Billingsley
green
1 sentence1984App. 3d 427, 436-37 , 369 N.E.2d 1320, 1327 .) Once these elements are shown, the burden is on the proponent of the will to present evidence tending to rebut the presumption (Tidholm v. Tidholm (1945), 391 Ill. 19 , 62 N.E.2d 473 ); however, “[t]he amount of evidence that is required from an adversary to meet the presumption is not determined by any fixed rule. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.