arraignment hearing (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

arraignment hearing in Illinois

8 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2024 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Thomas v. Greergreen
ill · 1991 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
1 sentence

2012The defendant can only receive credit for the time he spent in federal custody if it was “a consequence of the offenses upon which he seeks credit.” Thomas v. Greer, 143 Ill. 2d 271, 280 (1991).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
People v. Moore green
illappct · 2014
1 sentence

2024Moreover, deficient admonishments do not result in prejudice if “the defendant already knows of the omitted information or because the defendant’s degree of legal sophistication makes evident his or her awareness of the omitted information.” People v. Moore, 2014 IL App (1st) 112592, ¶ 38 . ¶ 30 Here, defendant asserted his desire to waive counsel at the arraignment hearing.

12024–2024
People v. Yost green
ill · 2021
1 sentence

2023There is no evidence that defense counsel was involved thereafter in defendant’s plea agreement in the prior case or had a “connection to a person or entity that would benefit from an unfavorable verdict for the defendant” (Yost, 2021 IL 126187, ¶ 39 ) while representing defendant in the case at bar.

12023–2023
People v. Stroud green
ill · 2004
1 sentence

2021The supreme court explained, “The number and gravity of rights at stake at a guilty plea hearing is greater than when a defendant intends to plead not guilty at arraignment.” Id.

12021–2021
People v. Rogers green
illappct · 2015
1 sentence

2015The record reflects that the trial court conducted an arraignment hearing, during which it read the - 29 - 2015 IL App (2d) 130412 seven counts of the indictment to defendant and explained the possible sentences she could face if convicted.

12015–2015
People v. Barker neutral
illappct · 1974
1 sentence

1982(See People v. Barker (1974), 23 Ill.

11982–1982
People v. McCaffrey neutral
illappct · 1975
1 sentence

1980App. 3d 1088 , 332 N.E.2d 28 , defendant waived counsel at both the arraignment hearing and the date originally set for trial.

11980–1980
People v. Barker green
ill · 1975
2 sentences

1977Even though the defendant was advised of his right to counsel either private or appointed, the admonitions do not in other respects conform to the standards described in People v. Barker, 62 Ill. 2d 57 , 338 N.E.2d 385 , and consequently the procedure cast doubts on the effectiveness of any waiver of counsel.

1977Even though the defendant was advised of his right to counsel either private or appointed, the admonitions do not in other respects conform to the standards described in People v. Barker, 62 Ill. 2d 57 , 338 N.E.2d 385 , and consequently the procedure cast doubts on the effectiveness of any waiver of counsel.

11977–1977

Where else courts name it

CA 13 (1972–2023) IL 8 (1977–2024) GA 7 (1985–2005) FL 7 (1986–2018) OH 4 (2007–2023) WA 3 (1995–2021) IN 3 (1975–2020) CT 3 (1982–2005) NY 3 (1987–2013) TX 3 (1975–2019) HI 3 (1996–2022) AR 2 (2003–2016) MI 2 (2019–2019) KS 2 (1913–2013) PA 2 (2019–2021) UT 2 (2015–2025) NE 2 (1986–2016) LA 2 (1967–2017) OR 2 (2004–2026) ID 2 (2020–2021) NC 2 (1983–2008) NM 2 (2010–2023)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check