Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1974–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Lentgreen2 sentences2015Such hearing must take place within 30 days. 625 ILCS 5/11-501.1(b) (West 2012). 1 Section 11-501(g) of the Code reads: “The statutory summary suspension or revocation and disqualification referred to in this Section shall take effect on the 46th day following the date the notice of the statutory summary suspension or revocation was given to the person.” 625 ILCS 5/11-501.1(g) (West 2012). -4- “The scope of a hearing on a petition to rescind is limited to the following: ‘(1) whether the person was placed under arrest for driving under the influence; (2) whether the arresting officer had reason 2011The scope of a hearing on a petition to rescind is limited to the following: “(1) whether the person was placed under arrest for driving under the influence; (2) whether the arresting officer had reasonable grounds to believe that the person was driving under the influence; (3) whether, after being advised by the arresting officer that the privilege to operate a motor vehicle would be suspended if the person refused to submit to blood-alcohol testing, the person refused to submit to such a test; and (4) whether, after being so advised, the person submitted to such testing and the test revealed | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Ernst
green
2 sentences2019Id. ¶ 29 On appeal, this court determined that the plain language of section 11-501.4-1 permitted the disclosure of the test results to local law enforcement personnel without the need for judicially authorized methods of court discovery. 2018Id. ¶ 29 On appeal, this court determined that the plain language of section 11-501.4-1 permitted the disclosure of the test results to local law enforcement personnel without the need for judicially authorized methods of court discovery. | 2 | 2018–2019 |
People v. Cronin
neutral
2 sentences1995(People v. Cronin (1987), 163 Ill. 1994People v. Cronin (1987), 163 Ill. | 2 | 1994–1995 |
People v. Grabeck
green
1 sentence2015App. 3d 80, 81 (1995) (citing 625 ILCS 5/2-118.1(b) (West 1994)).” People v. Grabeck, 2011 IL App (2d) 100599, ¶ 13 . ¶ 18 In regard to a summary suspension of a driver’s license, “notice” is the officer’s sworn report. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
People v. Gafford
green
1 sentence1992App. 3d 492, 497 , 578 N.E.2d 583, 586 , reasoned that failure to provide the requisite warnings was grounds for rescinding a statutory summary suspension, the issue the court addressed there was whether the arresting officer provided the warnings despite defendant’s testimony he was not warned. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
People v. Harris
green
2 sentences1974(Compare People v. Harris (1969), 105 Ill.App.2d 305 , 245 N.E.2d 80 .) Moreover, in light of the manner of appointment of defense counsel, we are reluctant to impose the doctrine of waiver. 1974(Compare People v. Harris (1969), 105 Ill.App.2d 305 , 245 N.E.2d 80 .) Moreover, in light of the manner of appointment of defense counsel, we are reluctant to impose the doctrine of waiver. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.